Published April 20, 2015 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Aneuretinae Emery 1913

Description

Subfamily Aneuretinae Emery, 1913

Figs 7A, 15C

Diagnosis

The male of Aneuretus simoni is uniquely identified by the exceedingly long and thin petiolar peduncle and the unpetiolated third abdominal segment. The species is further identified by the following combination of characters: oblique mesopleural sulcus present; seven closed cells present on forewing; jugal lobe absent; abdominal segment IV without cinctus between pre- and postsclerites; abdominal

sternum IX unpronged and edentate; telomere extending anteroventrad basimere. Additional characters for distinguishing A. simoni from the Dolichoderinae and Formicinae are indicated in couplets 19 and 20 above.

Comments

The sole extant member of the Aneuretinae, A. simoni, is restricted to Sri Lanka, and is the survivor of a lineage which has a somewhat diverse fossil record (LaPolla et al. 2013). The subfamily is of considerable interest as it is sister to the Dolichoderinae (Brady et al. 2006). Eight fossil genera are ascribed to the Aneuretinae based on the work of several authors (e.g., Dlussky & Rasnitsyn 2009). Some taxa, based on workers, are definitely members of the Aneuretinae, i.e., † Paraneuretus and † Protaneuretus from Baltic amber (37–42 My; Wheeler 1915; LaPolla et al. 2013), while others are less certain, i.e., † Pityomyrmex (also from Baltic amber, Wheeler 1915; placed in Aneuretinae by Dlussky & Rasnisyn 2009) and † Aneuretellus (Sakhalin amber, 56–59 My; Dlussky 1988; LaPolla et al. 2013). The impression-fossil taxa † Britaneuretus (see Antropov et al. 2014) and † Mianeuretus (see Carpenter 1930) may not be members of the Aneuretinae. Because of the occurrence of definitive aneuretines in Baltic amber, it will be critical to carefully study the reproductives occurring in these fossils to determine whether any may be placed in the Aneuretinae.

Two fossil “aneuretine” taxa are worth discussing specifically. The affinities of † Burmomyrma (~98 My, Burmese amber; Dlussky 1996; LaPolla et al. 2013) and † Cananeuretus (78–19 My, Canadian amber; Engel & Grimaldi 2005; LaPolla et al. 2013) with Aneuretus simoni are uncertain. The description and illustration of † Burmomyrma in Dlussky (1996) provide no characters which support a relationship of the fossil taxon with Aneuretus; the diagnosis includes one extreme autapomorphy and several characters which are pleisiomorphic for the family or are broadly shared among several subfamilies. The character combination indicated by Dlussky (1996) to assign † Burmomyrma to the Aneuretinae is weak, especially given that Aneuretus has complete (“ancestral”) wing venation while † Burmomyrma lacks almost all vein abscissae. Placement of † Burmomyrma within the Leptanillinae, and indeed other aculeate hymenopteran families, cannot be ruled out. No taxonomic action is taken here, however.

Cananeuretus, on the other hand, cannot be so easily considered distantly related to the Aneuretinae. The Grassy Lake deposit of Canadian amber includes representatives of the Sphecomyrminae, Ectatomminae, and critically, the Dolichoderinae (LaPolla et al. 2013). While the placement of the fossil dolichoderine † Chronomyrmex (see McKellar et al. 2013) in the Leptomyrmecini (sensu Ward et al. 2010) is debatable, co-occurrence of these subfamilies in this deposit suggests the placement of † Cananeuretus is plausible. As the diagnosis of the Aneuretinae provided here and previously (Wilson et al. 1956; Bolton 2003) is based largely on pleisiomorphic characters, other characters should be considered. For example, future studies of Canadian amber should be sensitive to specific traits occurring in Aneuretus and extant Dolichoderinae. Aneuretus shares, among other characters, a deep median notch on the anterior clypeal margin and fine serrations intercalated among larger denticles on the masticatory mandibular margin, both of which occur in the Tapinomini, the tribe sister to the remaining Dolichoderinae (Ward et al. 2010). Reconsideration of the fossil record of Aneuretinae will be valuable for improving our concepts of both the Aneuretinae and Dolichoderinae.

Notes

Published as part of Boudinot, Brendon E., 2015, Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages, pp. 1-62 in European Journal of Taxonomy 120 on pages 49-50, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2015.120, http://zenodo.org/record/3780152

Files

Files (4.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ec6509550bf73ec1867565c5eec4ce03
4.8 kB Download

System files (30.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:684700e2c17e2e4d99b6925229bb8cb9
30.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Formicidae
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Hymenoptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Emery
Taxon rank
subFamily
Taxonomic concept label
Aneuretinae Emery, 1913 sec. Boudinot, 2015

References

  • LaPolla J. S., Dlussky G. M. & Perrichot V. 2013. Ants and the fossil record. Annual Review of Entomology 58: 609 - 630. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1146 / annurev-ento- 120710 - 100600
  • Brady S. G., Schultz T. R., Fisher B. L. & Ward P. S. 2006. Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 18172 - 18177. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1073 / pnas. 0605858103
  • Dlussky G. M. & Rasnitsyn A. P. 2009. Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the Upper Eocene amber of central and eastern Europe. Paleontological Journal 43: 1024 - 1042.
  • Wheeler W. M. 1915 (1914). The ants of the Baltic Amber. Schriften der Physikalisch-Okonomischen Gesellschaft zu Konigsberg 55: 1 - 142.
  • Antropov A. V., Belokobylskij S. A., Compton S. G., Dlussky G. M., Khalaim A. I., Kolyada V. A., Kozlov M. A., Perfilieva K. S. & Rasnitsyn A. P. 2014. The wasps, bees and ants (Insecta: Vespida = Hymenoptera) from the insect limestone (Late Eocene) of the Isle of Wight, UK. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104: 335 - 446.
  • Dlussky G. M. 1996. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Burmese amber. Paleontological Journal 30: 449 - 454.
  • Engel M. S. & Grimaldi D. A. 2005. Primitive new ants in Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). American Museum Novitates 3485: 1 - 23.
  • McKellar R. C., Glasier J. R. N. & Engel M. S. 2013. New ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) from Canadian Late Cretaceous amber. Bulletin of Geosciences 88: 583 - 594. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3140 / bull. geosci. 1425
  • Ward P. S., Brady S. G., Fisher B. L. & Schultz T. R. 2010. Phylogeny and biogeography of dolichoderine ants: effects of data partitioning and relict taxa on historical inference. Systematic Biology 59: 342 - 362. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1093 / sysbio / syq 012
  • Wilson E. O., Eisner T., Wheeler G. C. & Wheeler J. 1956. Aneuretus simoni Emery, a major link in ant evolution. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 115: 81 - 99.
  • Bolton B. 2003. Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 71: 1 - 370.