Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published October 20, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Stimulation of development of the sphere of national intellectual capital use: foreign experience review

Creators

Description

Unbalanced development of the national economy, characterized by single-industry (raw materials) orientation, and the lack of demand from the industrial sector for technological innovation determined the worsening problem of the low level of private investment in research and development. The article describes the experience of foreign countries in terms of stimulating the development of national intellectual capital through the use of a set of measures to promote the growth of domestic spending on research and development, including through private investment. The experience of USA, China, the Netherlands and South Korea is presented in the article. It is concluded that the mechanism of the growth of domestic spending on research and development promotion, including by attracting private investment, consists of a variety of direct and indirect measures. A number of measures of investment stimulation in the sector of creation and use of national intellectual capital, both direct and indirect, which are represented in the economies of technologically advanced countries, can be used in Russia. However, when choosing a tool to stimulate the creation and use of intellectual capital through the growth in domestic expenditure on research and development, including by attracting private investment, it is important to be guided by the national features of the Russian economy and its scientiic and technological sphere. The article notes that the experience of the Netherlands, consisting in stimulating investments in the sector of creation and use of national intellectual capital through the approach of leading industries may be particularly interesting for integration into the Russian economy, which has single-industry character and raw-material orientation.

Files

Stimulation of development of the sphere of national intellectual capital use foreign experience review . Ushakova. 2016-4.pdf

Additional details

References

  • MINDELI, L., CHERNYKH, S. (2016) R&D expenditures: myths and facts. Society and Economics. (2). Р. 104–115.
  • A Strategy for American Innovation. Securing Our Economic Growth and Prosperity. National Economic Council, Council of Economic Advisers, and Ofice of Science and Technology Policy. (2011) Available from: https:// www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/iles/uploads/InnovationStrategy.pdf [Accessed: 8th June 2016].
  • The innovation conditions in 2015. (2015). Thomson Reuters report.
  • KORSHUNOVA, L., KUZMINA, N., KAMYNINA, L. (2015) The Role of National Innovation System in Development of Russian Economy. Siberian Journal of Science. (2). Р. 76–84.
  • The Russian stock market 2005–2013. The NAUFOR study. (2013) Available from: http://inparty.ru/sobytiya/17952/ [Accessed: 23th April 2016].
  • Venture Capital and Innovation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1996). Paris. Р. 96. Available from: https:// www.oecd.org/sti/inno/2102064.pdf [Accessed: 20th May 2016].
  • USHAKOVA, S., BUKHANOVA, YU. (2015) The Investment Aspect of a National Intellectual Capital Effective Use Stimulation: Foreign and Russian Experience. Science. Innovation. Education Almanac. (18). Р. 138–167.
  • BASHKATOVA, A. (2013) Russian innovation model fails. The Independent Newspaper. Economics. Available from: http://www. ng.ru/economics/2013-09-27/2_innovation.html [Accessed: 14th April 2016].
  • Venture Pulse Q3 2015. (2015) Global Analysis of Venture Funding. KPMG, CB Insights. Available from: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/ dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/11/venture-pulse-q3-report.pdf. [Accessed: 11th May 2016].
  • ERNST, D. (2011) China's Innovation Policy Is a Wake-Up Call for America. AsiaPaciic Issues. (100). Honolulu: East-West Center. Available from: http://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/chinas-innovationpolicy-wake-call-america. [Accessed: 20th May 2016].
  • SALITSKAYA, E. (2013) Scientiic and technological complex in PRC: experience of developing. Science. Innovation. Education Almanac. (14). P. 7–22.
  • CHOI, M., CHOI, H. (2015) Foresight for Science and Technology Priority Setting in Korea. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 9 (3). P. 54–67. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2015.3.54.65.
  • TROYEKUROVA, I., KOLOTYRINA, E. (2015) International Science and Technology Cooperation of the Republic of Korea. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law. Vol. 15. (1). P. 28–37.
  • (2014) Industry and Technology Policies in Korea. OECD Publishing. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264213227-en [Accessed: 12th April 2016].
  • DROZDOVA, E. (2015) Development technologies: problems and prospects. Economics and management in XXI century: tendencies of development. (21). P. 18–23.
  • KHALIPOV, V. (2015) The Innovation-oriented development of economy of the Republic of Korea. Theory and Practice of Social Development. (14). P. 67–69.
  • SCHWAB, K. (ed.) (2015) The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016. World Economic Forum Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf [Accessed: 19th May 2016].
  • OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Netherlands. (2014) OECD Publishing. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264213159- en (Accessed: 23th November 2015).
  • HESSELS, L., DEUTEN, J. (2013) Coordination of research in publicprivate partnerships: lessons from the Netherlands. Rathenau Instituut Working Paper 1302.
  • USHAKOVA, S. (2015) Formation of the iscal system to stimulate innovation in adapting international experience. National Interests. Priorities and Security. (9). P. 40–51.