Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published February 28, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Development of architectural models of interaction of virtual communities for organizing the collective documentation process

Creators

  • 1. Khmelnytskyi National University

Description

The object of this research is organizational methods of virtual community creation in web area. In this article were released researches of concerning types, communicative features, information behavior, distribution of possible roles among web participants of virtual communities, methods of their organizing and management. The research was identified strengths and weaknesses of all types of virtual communities with their main opportunities in the web space. Main principles of communicative peculiarities among participants from one virtual community of each organization type were given. The main problems caused by opportunities in collaboration among different web communities. It causes uncontrollable data flows, which can have influences on a content generation process. There were analyzed a positioning of different virtual communities types. It was identified all possible integrational variations among different virtual communities. This depends on positioning principle of different web communities’ types in the web area. There were proposed three main architectural paradigms of virtual community creation. The choosing of each of them depends on necessity of data flow management for improving content quality and communication safety between different participants. Each of these paradigms has some strength and weaknesses. The own web service development is the best solution for data flow isolation from other web communities and safety. Free web services contain local virtual communities, which are contains a global one. Collaboration between different virtual communities can cause unnecessary informational behavior of their participants. The interesting method is to combine proposed paradigms. According to the results, authors proposed situational methods of architectural organizing of virtual communities. Each of them has some benefits and weak sides.

Files

Development of architectural models of interaction of virtual communities for organizing the collective documentation process.pdf

Files (634.3 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Peleshchyshyn, A., Sierov, Yu., Berezko, O., Peleshchyshyn, O., Tymovchak-Maksymets, O., Markovets, O. (2011). Protsesy upravlinnia interaktyvnymy sotsialnymy komunikatsiiamy v umovakh rozvytku informatsiinoho suspilstva. Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivskoi politekhnika», 374.
  • Fedushko, S. (2011). Analiz arkhitektury ta suchasnykh tendentsii rozvytku virtualnykh spilnot. Informatsiini systemy ta merezhi, 699, 362–375.
  • Fedushko, S. (2016). Rozroblennia alhorytmu vyznachennia adekvatnosti danykh informatsiinoho obrazu uchasnyka virtualnykh spilnot. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 27, 132–138.
  • Fedushko, S., Trach O. (2016). Vyznachennia pokaznyka stiikosti virtualnoi spilnoty shchodo informatsiinykh atak. Bezpeka informatsii, 22 (1), 84–87.
  • Fedushko, S., Syerov, Yu., Peleschyshyn, A., Korzh, R. (2015). Determination of the account personal data adequacy of web-community member. International Journal of Computer Science and Business Informatics, 15 (1), 1–12.
  • Korzh, R., Peleschyshyn, A., Syerov, Yu., Fedushko, S. (2014). The cataloging of virtual communities of educational thematic. Webology, 11 (1), 117.
  • Hryshchuk, R., Molodetska, K. (2016). Synergetic Control of Social Networking Services Actors' Interactions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 34–42. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48923-0_5
  • Russell, M., Klassen, M. (2018). Mining the Social Web: Data Mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, GitHub, and More. O'Reilly Media, 423.
  • Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., Eastman, J. K. (1996). Opinion Leaders and Opinion Seekers: Two New Measurement Scales. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (2), 137–147. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396242004
  • Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication, 30 (3), 301–318. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115577305
  • Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., Pingree, R. J. (2015). News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders: Effects on Media Trust and Information Seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20 (5), 520–535. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127
  • Bottery, M. (2003). The End of Citizenship? The Nation State, Threats to its Legitimacy, and Citizenship Education in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33 (1), 101–122. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000064668
  • Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories: Perspectives,processes, and contexts. McGraw-Hill, 355.
  • Almeida Filho, N. M. de, Quintella, R. H., Coutinho, D. M. B., Mesquita, F. J. G., Barreto Filho, O. (2014). Mapa de Rede de Impactos para gestão estratégica na universidade. Educação & Realidade, 39 (1), 277–301. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-62362014000100016
  • Amaral, A., Magalhaes A. (2001). On Markets, Autonomy and Regulation. The Janus Head Revisited. Higher Education Policy, 14, 7–20.
  • Arimoto, A. (1997). Massification of Higher Education and Academic Reforms in Japan. Academic Reforms in the World: Situation and Perspective in the Massification Stage of Higher Education. Research Institute for Higher Education, 21–48.