Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published February 28, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The numerical CFD investigation of hub losses of pushing air propellers with tandem joined blades of small sized unmanned aerial vehicles

Creators

  • 1. National Aviation University

Description

The object of study is a pushing tandem propeller with joined blades. When analyzing the characteristics of pushing propellers, it was found that one of the problem areas is a decrease in their effectiveness due to a decrease in axial thrust, which occurs due to the formation of a zone of reduced pressure (vacuum) in the area of the hub and the propeller spinner. For pushing propellers of the classic design, the reduction in efficiency reaches a level of 1–2 %. For tandem propellers, such information is not available due to the fact that such structures are practically not used on aircraft. However, in recent years, potential opportunities and advantages over classical propellers have increased the interest of researchers in the issues of their use in aircraft. It is noted that the tandem propeller should have greater hub losses compared to the classic propeller, since the diffuser of the interscapular channel is greater. To assess the value and establish the factors influencing the formation of hub losses of tandem propellers, studies were carried out using numerical gas dynamics methods. During the study, to simulate the operation of the tandem propeller, we used the ANSYS CFX software package, which implements an algorithm for solving unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations closed by the SST Menter turbulence model. As a result of modeling, it was found that the level of secondary losses in the hub part of a tandem propeller is significantly affected by the mutual arrangement of the profiles of the first and second blades. When the angle of profiles installation of the second blades row increases, the vacuum in the hub part and in the spinner zone increases, which leads to the appearance of reverse thrust and reduces the thrust of the propeller by an average of 3–4 %. The obtained results confirmed the assumption that the hub losses of the tandem propellers directly depend on the diffusivity of the interscapular canal in the blades root part. Consideration of research results in the design of tandem propellers will reduce hub losses and increase the efficiency of the propellers.

Files

The numerical CFD investigation of hub losses of pushing air propellers with tandem joined blades of small sized unmanned aerial vehicles.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Additional details

References

  • Atinault, O., Carrier, G., Grenon, R., Verbecke, C., Viscat, P. (2013). Numerical and Experimental Aerodynamic Investigations of Boundary Layer Ingestion for Improving Propulsion Efficiency of Future Air Transport. 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2406
  • Seitz, A., Gologan, C. (2014). Parametric design studies for propulsive fuselage aircraft concepts. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 6 (1), 69–82. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-014-0130-3
  • European Comission. Flightpath 2050: Europe's vision for aviation, report of the high level group on aviation research. (2011). Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Drela, M., Mueller, T. J. (1989). XFOIL – An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics. Berlin: Springer-Velag, 1–12. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1
  • McGranahan, B. D., Selig, M. S. (2003). Surface Oil Flow Measurements on several Airfoils at Low Reynolds Numbers. 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-4067
  • Brandt, J. B. (2005). Small-Scale Propeller Performance at Low Speeds. Champaign. Available at: https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/props/volume-1/Brandt_2005_UIUC-MS-Thesis.pdf
  • Wang, M. H. (1985) Hub Effects in Propeller Design and Analysis. Massachusetts. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a158853.pdf
  • Yin, J., Stuermer, A., Aversano, M. (2012). Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Analysis of Installed Pusher-Propeller Aircraft Configurations. Journal of Aircraft, 49 (5), 1423–1433. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/1.c031704
  • Yang, Y., Zhou, T., Sciacchitano, A., Veldhuis, L., Eitelberg, G. (2016). Propeller and inflow vortex interaction: vortex response and impact on the propeller performance. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 7 (3), 419–428. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-016-0198-z
  • Yang, Y., Zhou, T., Sciacchitano, A., Veldhuis, L., Eitelberg, G. (2015). Propeller and inflow vortex interaction: vortex response and impact on the propeller performance. 5th CEAS Air & Space Conference. Delft, Sep.
  • Capitao Patrao, A. (2018). On the Aerodynamic Design of the Boxprop. Gothenburg, 74. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328530718_On_the_Aerodynamic_Design_of_the_Boxprop
  • Shen, C., Qiang, X., Teng, J. (2012). Numerical and experimental investigation of an axial compressor flow with tandem cascade. Journal of Thermal Science, 21 (6), 500–508. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-012-0574-x
  • Capitao Patrao, A., Avellán, R., Lundbladh, A., Grönstedt, T. (2016). Wake and Loss Analysis for a Double Bladed Swept Propeller. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo. Seoul. doi: http://doi.org/10.1115/gt2016-56540
  • Ruchala, P. (2016). An influence of pusher propeller cover on its performance – A concept of wind tunnel investigation. Journal of KONES, 23 (4), 429–434. doi: http://doi.org/10.5604/12314005.1217263
  • Xu, J.-H., Song, W.-P., Yang, X.-D., Zhang, Y. (2017). Investigation on Improving Efficiency of High-Altitude Propeller with Tandem Configuration. AIAA AVIATION Forum. 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Denver, 12. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-3575
  • Djihada, B., Omar, I. (2017). Impact of some geometrical aspects on the tandem co-rotating propeller hydrodynamic characteristics. Brodogradnja, 68 (1), 107–123. doi: http://doi.org/10.21278/brod68107
  • Jiang, X., Li, T., Hu, J., Lin, Y. (2019). Numerical Simulation and Design of Parameter Matching on the Open Water Performance of CRP. The 29th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. Honolulu, 8.
  • Jung, H., Kanemoto, T., Liu, P. (2017). A Numerical Prediction of Tip Vortices from Tandem Propellers in the Counter-Rotating Type Tidal Stream Power Unit. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 5 (12), 66–74. doi:10.4236/jpee.2017.512009
  • Tillman, G., Ochs, S. S., Kearney, J. S., Wake, B. E. (2006). Control of high-reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer separation using counter-flow fluid injection. 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference, 14. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-3025
  • Cerretelli, C., Gharaibah, E., Toplack, G., Gupta, A., Wuerz, W. (2009). Unsteady separation control for wind turbine applications at full scale reynolds numbers. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-380
  • Parra P. H. G., Angulo M. V. D., Gaona G. E. E. (2018). CFD Analysis of two and four blades for multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Conference: 2018 IEEE 2nd Colombian Conference on Robotics and Automation (CCRA), 7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/ccra.2018.8588130
  • Shi, W., Li, J., Yang, Z., Zhang, H. (2018). CFD Analysis of Contrarotating Open Rotor Aerodynamic Interactions. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 1–13. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9538787
  • Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32 (8), 1598–1605. doi: http://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149