Working paper Open Access
Sainz, Susana
Most theories of stress have accounted for the basic stress patterns of English by a
combination of stress and destressing rules. As Kiparsky (1979) points out, Liberman and
Prince's (L&P) (1977) stress rules assign metrical structure in the following four main
steps:
In the present study, however, we give some arguments in favour of a noncyclic application of English word stress rules within the framework of a level-ordered morphology.
We deal exclusively with English derivational processes and argue (i) that level I morphology is the domain of word stress and destressing rules and (ii) that these rules apply in a noncyclic fashion, i.e., all level I affixation is done in one step before the stress and destressing rules apply. .
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
wpcpl3-Sainz.pdf
md5:650765f92cfbee39f564fe920bfd1bde |
6.3 MB | Download |
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 233 | 233 |
Downloads | 6 | 6 |
Data volume | 37.6 MB | 37.6 MB |
Unique views | 167 | 167 |
Unique downloads | 6 | 6 |