Published March 23, 2020 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Hymedesmiidae Topsent 1928

Description

Family Hymedesmiidae Topsent, 1928

Definition: (amended from Van Soest 2002:575): Poecilosclerida with smooth or acanthose ectosomal tornotes (basically diactinal, oxeote, but may be anisotornotes or styles), a peripheral choanosomal plumose skeleton of bundles or tracts of smooth or acanthose tornotes, a basal skeleton of acanthostyles, singly or in plumose bundles (may be absent), echinating acanthostyles (may be absent) or, a choanosmal confused arrangement of all spicule categories. Additional non-echinating acanthostyles or acanthoxeas may occasionally be present. Microscleres include arcuate chelas and sigmas, but may be absent. Ectosomal surfaces often but, not always with areolated porefields.

Discussion: To accommodate the new genus in Hymedesmiidae the definition (Van Soest 2002, p. 575) requires expanding to allow for the possession of acanthose ectosomal tornotes (other hymedesmiids have only smooth tornotes) and a confusedly plumose choanosomal arrangement of spicules which include the choanosomal tornotes. In addition, the ectosome is often but not always with areolated pore-fields. At present the family Hymedesmiidae contains 10 genera, none with acanthose tornotes or with a more confusedly plumose choanosomal arrangement of spicules. We present additional differences between Acantorna n. gen. and the existing genera of Hymedesmiidae (according to Van Soest 2002: 576-593):

- Acanthancora Topsent, 1927 has modified spined tuberculate chelae and a hymedesmioid arrangement of spicules.

- Hamigera Gray, 1867 has strongyles ot tylotes as tornotes, choanosomal smooth styles or subtylostyles.

- Hemimycale Burton, 1934 has no acanthostyles and no microscleres. Smooth strongyles and styles are not separated in ectosomal and choanosomal regions.

- Hymedesmia Bowerbank, 1864 are all thinly encrusting and have a hymedesmioid skeletal arrangement.

- Kirkpatrickia Topsent, 1912 has strongylote tornotes, lacks microscleres and “smooth or spined styles in plumose but anastomosing bundles.”

- Myxodoryx Burton, 1929 has strongylote tornotes, two categories of acanthostyles “in plumose but anastomosing bundles” and lacks microscleres.

- Phorbas Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 has “plumose tracts of tornotes and/or acanthostyles.”

- Plocamionida Topsent, 1927 has a “plocamiid basal skeleton. Megascleres mucronate tornotes, long acanthostyles, and basal acanthostrongyles.” Sigmas are absent.

- Pseudohalichondria Carter, 1886 has “plumose columns of smooth tornotes, without acanthostyles, with modified spined chelae.”

- Spanioplon Topsent, 1890 “has non-echinating accessory acanthostyles or acanthoxeas. No chelae.” Ectosomal anisotornotes are smooth.

Notes

Published as part of Lehnert, Helmut & Stone, Robert P., 2020, Acantorna-a new genus of Hymedesmiidae (Porifera, Demospongiae Poecilosclerida) from the western Aleutian Islands of Alaska with description of Acantorna tahoma n. sp., pp. 155-162 in Zootaxa 4755 (1) on page 157, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4755.1.7, http://zenodo.org/record/3724311

Files

Files (3.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e6ffab862998e64809deee94c23302ec
3.3 kB Download

System files (15.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f4298edd6a66e1f6cb12ce6b6c95f41e
15.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Hymedesmiidae
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Poecilosclerida
Phylum
Porifera
Scientific name authorship
Topsent
Taxon rank
family
Taxonomic concept label
Hymedesmiidae Topsent, 1928 sec. Lehnert & Stone, 2020

References

  • Topsent, E. (1928) Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Mediterranee provenant des croisieres du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Resultats des campagnes scientifiques accomplies par le Prince Albert I, Monaco, 74, 1 - 376, pls. I-XI.
  • Topsent, E. (1927) Diagnoses d'Eponges nouvelles recueillies par le Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Bulletin de l'Institut oceanographique Monaco, 502, 1 - 19.
  • Gray, J. E. (1867) Notes on the Arrangement of Sponges, with the Descriptions of some New Genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1867 (2), 492 - 558, pls. XXVII-XXVIII. [https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 29533932]
  • Burton, M. (1934) Sponges. Scientific Reports of the Great Barrier Reef Expedition 1928 - 29, 4 (14), 513 - 621, pls. 1 - 2. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 49517195 # page / 667 / mode / 1 up]
  • Bowerbank, J. S. (1864) A Monograph of the British Spongiadae. Vol. 1. Ray Society, London, xx + 290 pp., XXXVII pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 2038
  • Topsent, E. (1912) Sur une grande Tedania abyssale des Acores (Tedania phacellina, n. sp.). Bulletin de l'Institut oceanographique, Monaco, 252, 1 - 7.
  • Burton, M. (1929) Porifera. Part II. Antarctic sponges. British Antarctic (' Terra Nova') Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, British Museum (Natural History), London, Zoology, 6 (4), 393 - 458, pls. I-V. https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 49467888
  • Duchassaing de Fonbressin, P. & Michelotti, G. (1864) Spongiaires de la mer Caraibe. Natuurkundige verhandelingen van de Hollandsche maatschappij der wetenschappen te Haarlem, 21 (2), 1 - 124, pls. I-XXV. [https: // books. google. nl / books / about / Natuurkundige _ verhandelingen _ van _ de _ Holl. html? id = djVFAAAAcAAJ & redir _ esc = y & hl = nl]
  • Carter, H. J. (1886) Supplement to the Descriptions of Mr. J. Bracebridge Wilson's Australian Sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 18 (106), 271 - 290 + 369 - 379 + 445 - 466, pl. X, pp. 454 - 455, pl. C, figs. 6 - 9. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222938609459970
  • Topsent, E. (1890) Notice preliminaire sur les spongiaires recueillis durant les campagnes de l'Hirondelle. Bulletin de la Societe zoologique de France, 15, 26 - 32 + 65 - 71. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 18721