Published March 13, 2020 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Cladocarpus pennatus Galea 2020, sp. nov.

  • 1. Hydrozoan Research Laboratory, 405 Chemin Les Gatiers, 83170 Tourves, France.

Description

Cladocarpus pennatus sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 7E29B1BC-C12D-43BE-8D91-0BB238C6CDBA

Figs 6 C–E, 8–9; Table 2

Diagnosis

Cladocarpus with large, fan-shaped colonies, with strongly fascicled stems and side branches. Nodes rather indistinct, internodes with a proximal, frontal nematotheca, a cladial apophysis with its coneshaped nematotheca, as well as a fronto-axillar nematotheca. Cladia close to one another, divided into short internodes; first internode short, with a nematotheca, but no hydrotheca; remainder of cladium with normal cormidia. Hydrothecae facing backwards with respect to the antero-posterior plane of the colony; sigmoid, variously bulging abaxially from their lower halves; mesial nematotheca conspicuous, half adnate, projecting obliquely forward and upward (shorter and strongly pointing laterally on first cormidium); hydrothecal aperture with a median, triangular cusp and 1–2 pairs of laterals, decreasing in size adaxially; an internal, adaxial septum plunging down into the hydrothecal lumen for half its width. Gonosome composed of gonothecae arising from the cladial apophyses and phylactocarps borne on the first cormidium of a cladium that has lost its proximalmost, nematothecate internode. Phylactocarps elongated, set with consecutive pairs of lateral nematothecae, an additional, median, distal row occasionally present. Gonothecae dimorphic, male tubular, with recurved distal end bearing large aperture flanked by two lobes, female comparatively smaller and fusiform.

Etymology

From the Latin ‘ pennātus, -a, -um ’, meaning ‘bearing plumes’, with reference to the plumose appearance of its colonies.

Material examined

Holotype

PACIFIC OCEAN • 1 colony, ca 6 × 6 cm, hydrorhiza missing, bearing male gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4720; 22°50ʹ S, 167°11ʹ E; 374–400 m; 19 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-534.

Paratypes

PACIFIC OCEAN • 1 colony, ca 4.5 × 6.5 cm, hydrorhiza missing, bearing female gonothecae with welldiscerned oocytes; off New Caledonia, stn DW4720; 22°50ʹ S, 167°11ʹ E; 374–400 m; 19 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-535 • two colonies, ca 8 × 4.5 cm and 5 × 4.5 cm, both without hydrorhizae, but bearing female gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4707; 22°46ʹ S, 167°23ʹ E; 291– 259 m; 17 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-537.

Additional material

PACIFIC OCEAN • 1 colony, ca 11 × 8.5 cm, bearing female gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn CP4704; 22°46ʹ S, 167°19ʹ E; 365– 356 m; 17 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-531 • 1 young, unbranched, sterile colony, 7 cm high, hydrorhiza missing; off New Caledonia, stn DW4762; 23°16ʹ S, 168°06ʹ E; 810– 805 m; 26 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-532 • 1 colony fragment, ca 3.8 × 2 cm, bearing female gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4713; 22°47ʹ S, 167°47ʹ E; 356–380 m; 18 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-533 • 3 colonies, ca 10 × 7 cm, 8 × 5.5 cm and 10 × 7 cm, with female gonothecae, 1 colony, 12 × 4 cm, without gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn CP4675; 22°50ʹ S, 167°30ʹ E; 350–366 m; 13 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN- IK-2015-536 • 3 colonies with or without hydrorhizae and no gonothecae, ca 7.5 × 4.5 cm, 5.5 × 2 cm, and 5.5 × 7.5 cm, respectively, 1 colony, ca 5 × 6.5, without hydrorhiza and starting to reproduce (only phylactocarps but no gonothecae are present), 1 male colony, 5 × 3 cm, hydrorhiza missing, upper part of 1 large colony, ca 4.2 × 6 cm, with male gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4717; 22°44ʹ S, 167°11ʹ E; 336–361 m; 19 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-538 • 1 long fragment, 2.7 cm, without gonothecae, with strongly bent hydrothecae and hypertrophied nematothecae; off New Caledonia, stn CP4676; 22°51ʹS, 167°30ʹ E; 383 m; 13 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN- IK-2015-539 • 2 colony fragments, ca 4 × 2 cm and 2.4 cm, respectively, both with male gonothecae, 1 unbranched colony, 6 cm high, without gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4679; 22°49ʹ S, 167°33ʹ E; 245–249 m; 13 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-540 • 1 colony, ca 7 × 5 cm, with female gonothecae, 1 colony, ca 6.5 × 4.5 cm, hydrorhiza and gonothecae missing; off New Caledonia, stn DW4706; 22°47ʹ S, 167°24ʹ E; 355– 343 m; 17 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN- IK-2015-541 • 1 colony, ca 8 × 4 cm, without hydrorhiza, bearing male gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4708; 22°44ʹ S, 167°21ʹ E; 71– 68 m; 17 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-542 • 1 unbranched colony, ca 5 cm high, without hydrorhiza and gonothecae; off New Caledonia, stn DW4745; 22°57ʹ S, 167°39ʹ E; 310–403 m; 23 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK- 2014-2594.

Description

Colonies erect, fan-shaped, up to 11 cm high and 8.5 cm wide, arising from rhizoid stolon composed of numerous branching, anastomosing, contiguous fibers firmly anchoring the whole structure on its substrate. Stems strongly fascicled, branched irregularly with a tendency to alternate, main stem supported dorsally by beam of auxiliary tubes, each provided with a longitudinal row of deeply-immersed, saccate nematothecae, having only their distal parts, bearing the apertures, protruding from the perisarc. There are no proximal oblique nodes passing through the fascicled stem; main tube with indistinct division into internodes, except for the distalmost parts of a colony, where the perisarc is thinner, and where weak transverse node delimit very short internodes; the latter composed of a proximal, frontal nematotheca, a laterally-directed cladial apophysis with its reduced conical nematotheca (with small, rounded aperture), and a second, frontal (axillar) nematotheca rather lateral to the apophysis; stem nematothecae elongated, with gutter-shaped apertures, occasionally inverted-triangular, with wide distal apertures and backwardly-rolled abaxial walls. Apophyses alternate along the stem, well-developed, delimited from the corresponding cladium by a deeply-cut, very oblique node; cladia close to one another, up to 7 mm long, slightly convex, proximally pointing upwards and distally downwards, the two rows coplanar; first cladial internode very short, ahydrothecate, but provided with a frontal, gutter-shaped nematotheca, ending in oblique node, separating it from the remainder of cladium, the latter comprising a regular succession of short internodes delimited by means of transverse nodes (100–115 µm wide); each internode 350–365 µm long, with a hydrotheca and its 3 associated nematothecae: one mesial and a pair of laterals; through a torsion of the cladium at its insertion on the corresponding apophysis, all hydrothecae face backwards with respect to the antero-posterior plane of the colony. Hydrothecae 260– 270 µm deep, S-shaped, with thick abaxial wall, with an internal septum given off from the lower ¼ of the cavity and projecting slightly downwards so as to reach about the middle of the thecal lumen, ending distally in a perisarc plug; aperture ca 160 µm wide, rim with a central, prominent, triangular, abaxial cusp, continued laterally with 1–2 additional cusps decreasing in size adaxially. Mesial nematotheca adnate for ¾ to ½ of its length to the hydrothecal base, free part 115–125 µm long, aperture adaxial and gutter-shaped over entire length of free part; lateral nematothecae long (ca 145 µm), tubular, pointing out- and upwards, adaxial wall deeply scooped out. First cladial hydrotheca with comparatively shorter mesial nematotheca, given off from below its base, and distinctly pointing towards the dorsal side of the colony. Gonosome composed of phylactocarps, each associated with one gonotheca; gonothecae given off from the cladial apophyses just above the conical nematotheca and lateral to the distalmost internodal stem nematotheca; phylactocarps given off from cladia modified proximally as follows: the proximalmost ahydrothecate internode carrying the single, frontal nematotheca is replaced by a complete cormidium delimited by very oblique nodes; its mesial nematotheca is comparatively shorter than the subsequent ones, is given off from below the hydrothecal base, and is distinctly shifted on to the dorsal side of the colony; the second cormidium, also complete, is delimited proximally by an oblique node and distally by the first transverse node of the cladium; its mesial nematotheca is more elongated than that of the first cormidium and surpasses, for a certain distance, the hydrothecal base, but is still slightly shifted laterally; the third and subsequent cormidia are similar to those of a normal hydrocladium, with well-defined, straight mesial nematothecae. The phylactocarps are given off from the first cormidium, lateral to and above the mesial nematotheca, towards the front of the colony, by means of a short, conical apophysis delimited distally by transverse node, and having a long, guttershaped nematotheca at its base; phylactocarp composed of a double row of nematothecae, 6–10 in female colonies and up to 30 in males; in the latter, the double row is often supplemented distally by a number of additional nematothecae situated dorsally in a median row. Colonies dioecious; the gonothecae occur in groups towards the distal parts of the colonies, and are given off simultaneously from numerous consecutive apophyses of the branches; male gonothecae large (ca 1395 × 460 µm), tapering below, distally narrowing to a downwardly-curved neck, with broad aperture flanked by a pair of lobes; female comparatively smaller (ca 955 × 330 µm), fusiform, with minute (ca 35 µm wide), apical aperture, despite the much larger size of the oocytes.

Remarks

Several Cladocarpus -like hydroids possess S-shaped hydrothecae provided with an adaxial septum, similar to those of C. pennatus sp. nov. However, there are morphological features enabling their specific separation, and these are summarized in Table 2.

The male gonothecae of the new species recall those of Wanglaophenia longicarpa Vervoort & Watson, 2003 (see Vervoort & Watson: fig. 81h), but the carinate hydrothecae and the forked phylactocarps bearing hydrothecae (Vervoort & Watson 2003) of the latter readily distinguishes these hydroids.

Distribution

Known only from off New Caledonia (present study).

Genus Gymnangium Hincks, 1874

Gymnangium expansum (Jäderholm, 1903)

Fig. 10

Gymnangium expansum – Vervoort 1966: 165, figs 65–66. — Rees & Vervoort 1987: 163, fig. 38a–b. —

Vervoort & Watson 2003: 289, figs 68g, 69a.

Material examined

PACIFIC OCEAN • 1 colony, ca 10 cm high, lightly fascicled, fertile; off New Caledonia, stn DW5007; 22°12ʹ S, 159°02ʹ E; 290–750 m; 19 Sep. 2017; KANADEEP leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-515 • 1 colony, ca 10.5 cm high, lightly fascicled, sterile; off New Caledonia, stn DW4777; 23°03ʹ S, 168°16ʹ E; 330–353 m; 28 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-516 • two sterile stems, the first ca 16 cm high and monosiphonic, the second ca 20 cm high and lightly fascicled; off New Caledonia, stn DW4711; 22°47ʹ S, 167°24ʹ E; 335–338 m; 18 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-517 • 1 colony, ca 16 cm high, lightly fascicled, sterile; off New Caledonia, stn CP4674; 22°48ʹ S, 167°29ʹ E; 311– 302 m; 13 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-518 • 1 colony, ca 12 cm high, lightly fascicled, sterile; off New Caledonia, stn DW4672; 22°47ʹ S, 167°26ʹ E; 310– 290 m; 13 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-521.

Remarks

For a description of this species, refer to Vervoort (1966) and Rees & Vervoort (1987); a quite recent synonymy is given in Vervoort & Watson (2003). In these accounts, only slightly bent hydrothecae, whose nematothecae have single apical apertures, were documented, not reaching the extreme degree of curvature (aperture parallel to long axis of the internode) met with in material MNHN-IK-2015-516, in which, additionally, the mesial nematothecae display 4–6 frontal apertures, while the pairs of laterals have bifid apertures. In contrast, the material MNHN-IK-2015-515 has less curved hydrothecae (their apertures form an angle of 45° with the long axis of the internode), but their mesial nematothecae still display 2–3 frontal apertures, while the laterals possess only one. An intermediate situation is met with in sample MNHN-IK-2015-518, in which the hydrothecal apertures form an angle of ca 70° with the internode and the mesial nematothecae possess 1–2 frontal apertures, while the laterals have only one. Bifid mesial nematothecae were observed so far in specimens from Japan studied by Schuchert (2015).

In all samples examined the branching pattern is ‘trifid’, with either mono- (the 16 cm-high colony from sample MNHN-IK-2015-517) or lightly polysiphonic (all remaining material) stems; in addition, their hydrothecae are free from their corresponding internodes for ca ⅓ of their adaxial length, fitting the original account by Jäderholm (1903).

There is no thorough description available of the mode of branching in this species, especially at microscopic level. The original account is quite evasive (“ Die Verästelung ist sehr regelmässig und characteristisch. Die nach allen Seiten gerichteten Äste sitzen fast immer zu zweien zusammen, sind sehr deutlich spiralförmig angeordnet und nach aussen gebogen ” [The branching is very regular and characteristic. The branches are directed to all sides, almost always they are given off in pairs, are arranged in an obvious spiral, and are bent outwards]). However, Jäderholm (1903: pl. 14 fig. 5) provides a comprehensive illustration of the macroscopic appearance of a typical colony. According to his figure, a pair of plumes is given off at each geniculation of the stem, the successive pairs facing outwards with respect to the spiral built up by the stem.

Subsequent accounts seem to provide rather divergent data. Indeed, the material studied by Stechow (1909: 103, fig. 8) was devoid of the characteristic spiral growth pattern, the main stem giving rise, here and there, to secondary branches that further divide trichotomously. The colony studied by Billard (1918: 25, as Halicornaria sibogae) formed a helicoid sympodium (“ Colonie […] ramifiée en sympode hélicoïde ”), thus partly agreeing with the type, although nothing is said about its branching pattern. The account given by Vervoort (1966: 165) (“The structure of the colony is sympodially [sic]: the main axis is formed by the basal parts of successive plumes, arranged in spiral fashion, each succeeding plume rising about 8 mm from the base of the preceding plume”) does not conform with the structure of the type either since, at each geniculation, only one plume, instead of two, is given off. Rees & Vervoort (1987) observed a “Sympodially built stem with helically arranged, unbranched plumes …” in their material, resembling those examined earlier by Vervoort (1966).

On the other hand, the colony illustrated by Rho & Park (1980: pl. 9 fig. 1) is undoubtedly similar to that of the type, despite their description (Rho & Park 1980: 27) providing only limited details: “Colonies large, not fascicled, spirally branched. The hydrocaulus [is] divided into regular internodes, zigzagshaped”.

Finally, Vervoort & Watson (2003: 289) claim that they “have little to add to the descriptions of this characteristic species given by previous authors”.

As noted above, the branching pattern met with in the present material from New Caledonia is superficially trifid, as follows: the stem is geniculate and describes a spiral; at more or less regular intervals, the main tube bifurcates at each geniculation: in the exact continuation of the long axis of the original portion before the geniculation, it is prolonged as a plume (bearing hydrocladia), while the divergent part continues, slightly inclined (with respect to the preceding longitudinal axis), as the main stem proper; from the base of the divergent portion of the stem, two (originally twin) tubes are given off: one runs downwards along the preceding portion of the stem below the geniculation (bringing polysiphony to the colony), while the other is given away upwards, forming a second plume (bearing hydrocladia) (Fig. 10A).

In this context, the specific separation between G. expansum and its closest congener, Gymnangium tubulifer (Bale, 1914), seems to rely exclusively on the appearance of the colonies resulting from their mode of branching. When describing his species, Bale (1914) referred to the structure of the colony of G. vegae (Jäderholm, 1903), as did Vervoort & Watson (2003), who stated that the stem of G. tubulifer “… is geniculate and more or less spiral, composed of the proximal parts of stem elements that at each geniculation turn aside to form a branch. At the same place the proximal element splits off to form 3 ramifications of which [one] continues as the “stem”, [one] as a branch pointing away from the original element, and [one] as a downwardly directed tube, covering the more proximal parts of the “stem””. This results in a colony whose distinctive appearance is depicted by Jäderholm (1903: pl. 15 fig. 1).

In a molecular study by Ronowicz et al. (2017), G. expansum is shown to cluster with members of the genus Gymnangium Hincks, 1874 instead of with Taxella Allman, 1874, in spite of the colony structure showing obvious affinities with the latter. As noted by these authors, Stechow (1921) proposed a new genus, Halicetta, to accommodate G. expansum, with the following diagnosis: “hydrothecae elongated, curved but not bent, with no abaxial septum”. This, however, does not differ much from characters of Taxella, even though emphasis was placed on characters of the gonosome in particular. A more comprehensive analysis is necessary to elucidate the generic affinities of Jäderholm’s (1903) hydroid.

Distribution

Scattered records from the tropical and subtropical Indian and Pacific Oceans, from Zanzibar to Japan (Vervoort & Watson 2003).

Genus Lytocarpia Kirchenpauer, 1872

Lytocarpia brevirostris (Busk, 1852)

Fig. 11A

Lytocarpia brevirostris – Di Camillo et al. 2011: 525, figs 2c, 3b, f, 6d, 7–8.

Material examined

PACIFIC OCEAN • several plumes branched or unbranched, 1.8–4.5 cm high, of which one bears a young corbula; off New Caledonia, stn DW4774; 23°01ʹ S, 168°19ʹ E; 100– 90 m; 28 Aug. 2016; KANACONO leg.; MNHN-IK-2015-514.

Remarks

For a recent description of this well-known species, refer to Di Camillo et al. (2011), who also provided an extensive synonymy.

Distribution

Widespread in tropical parts of the Indian Ocean, from Africa to Indonesia, and the northeastern South Pacific (Di Camillo et al. 2001).

Notes

Published as part of Galea, Horia R., 2020, Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program, pp. 1-47 in European Journal of Taxonomy 615 on pages 14-22, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.615, http://zenodo.org/record/3711000

Files

Files (26.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a9c8e98010039b80da28f89ad5c983f5
26.2 kB Download

System files (123.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5812ddf75dca97e782b2c4e2ec966bc1
123.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

References

  • Bedot M. 1921. Hydroides provenant des campagnes des Yachts Hirondelle et Princesse-Alice (1887 - 1912). Resultats des Campagnes scientifiques accomplies sur son Yacht par Albert Ier Prince souverain de Monaco 60: 1 - 74.
  • Ramil F. & Vervoort W. 1992 b. Report on the Hydroida collected by the " BALGIM " expedition in and around the Strait of Gibraltar. Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden 277: 1 - 262. Available from https: // www. repository. naturalis. nl / document / 149146 [accessed 6 Mar. 2020].
  • Calder D. R. & Vervoort W. 1998. Some hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, in the North Atlantic Ocean. Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden 319: 1 - 65. Available from https: // www. repository. naturalis. nl / document / 149104 [accessed 6 Mar. 2020].
  • Ansin Agis J., Ramil F. & Vervoort W. 2001. Atlantic Leptolida (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) of the families Aglaopheniidae, Halopterididae, Kirchenpaueriidae and Plumulariidae collected during the CANCAP and Mauritania-II expeditions of the National Museum of Natural History, Leiden, the Netherlands. Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden 333: 1 - 268. Available from https: // repository. naturalis. nl / document / 46286 [accessed 6 Mar. 2020].
  • Billard A. 1934. Note sur quelques hydroides du Maroc. Bulletin de la Societe zoologique de France 59: 227 - 231.
  • Vervoort W. 1966. Bathyal and abyssal hydroids. Scientific Results of the Danish Deep-Sea Expedition 1950 - 1952. Galathea Report 8: 97 - 174.
  • Millard N. A. H. 1975. Monograph on the Hydroida of southern Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 68: 1 - 513.
  • Allman G. J. 1877. Report on the Hydroida collected during the exploration of the Gulf Stream by L. F. de Pourtales, Assistant United States Coast Survey. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 5 (2): 1 - 66. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10420
  • Bogle M. A. 1975. A Review and Preliminary Revision of the Aglaopheniinae (Hydroida: Plumulariidae) of the Tropical Western Atlantic. MSc Thesis, University of Miami, Coral Gables, USA.
  • Bogle M. A. 1984. Cladocarpoides yucatanicus, a new genus and species of Aglaopheniinae (Coelenterata: Hydroida: Plumulariidae) from Arrowsmith Bank, Yucatan Channel. Bulletin of Marine Science 34 (1): 135 - 140.
  • Vervoort W. & Watson J. E. 2003. The marine fauna of New Zealand: Leptothecata (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) (thecate hydroids). NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 119: 1 - 538. Available from https: // archive. org / details / niwabiodiversitymemoir 01192003 [accessed 6 Mar. 2020].
  • Jaderholm E. 1903. Aussereuropaische Hydroiden im schwedischen Reichsmuseum. Arkiv for Zoologi 1: 259 - 312.
  • Rees W. J. & Vervoort W. 1987. Hydroids from the John Murray expedition to the Indian Ocean, with revisory notes on Hydrodendron, Abietinella, Cryptolaria and Zygophylax (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden 237: 1 - 209. Available from https: // www. repository. naturalis. nl / document / 148867 [accessed 6 Mar. 2020].
  • Schuchert P. 2015. On some hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from the Okinawa Islands, Japan. Revue suisse de Zoologie 122 (2): 325 - 370. https: // doi. org / 10.5281 / zenodo. 30004
  • Billard A. 1918. Notes sur quelques especes d'hydroides de l'Expedition du Siboga. Archives de Zoologie experimentale et generale 57: 21 - 27.
  • Rho B. J. & Park J. H. 1980. A systematic study on the marine hydroids in Korea 6. Thecata. Journal of Korean Research Institute for Better Living 25: 15 - 43.
  • Bale W. M. 1914. Report on the Hydroida collected in the Great Australian Bright and other localities, II. Fisheries. Zoological (and Biological) Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by F. I. S. " Endeavour ", 1909 - 1910 2 (4): 164 - 188.
  • Ronowicz M., Boissin E., Postaire B., Bourmaud C. A. - F., Gravier-Bonnet N. & Schuchert P. 2017. Modern alongside traditional taxonomy - Integrative systematics of the genera Gymnangium Hincks, 1874 and Taxella Allman, 1874 (Hydrozoa, Aglaopheniidae). PLOS ONE 12 (4): 1 - 43. https: // doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0174244
  • Stechow E. 1921. Uber Hydroiden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition, nebst Bemerkungen uber einige andre Formen. Zoologischer Anzeiger 53: 223 - 236.
  • Di Camillo C. G., Puce S. & Bavestrello G. 2011. Lytocarpia and Cladocarpus (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Aglaopheniidae) from the Bunaken National Marine Park (North Sulawesi, Indonesia). Marine Biology 41 (4): 517 - 536. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 12526 - 011 - 0081 - 4