Published March 5, 2019 | Version v1
Figure Open

FIGURE 1 in The Dogma of Dingoes-Taxonomic status of the dingo: A reply to Smith et al

Description

FIGURE 1. Principal component analysis of 14 Gray Wolves, 40 Village dogs, 40 ancient dog breeds (Akita, Basenji, Chow Chow), 29 modern Australian dog breeds (Cattle dog and Australian Shepherd) from Shannon et al. (2015), and 23 Dingoes from Cairns et al. (2018). We filtered the data from the different studies to include only breeds of interest, and we kept shared SNPs using PLINK v1.90b5 (Chang et al. 2015). PC analysis was conducted using PLINK. Variation explained by the first five principal components was computed based on the eigenvalues of the first 20 components.

Notes

Published as part of Jackson, Stephen M., Fleming, Peter J.S., Eldridge, Mark D.B., Ingleby, Sandy, Flannery, Tim, Johnson, Rebecca N., Cooper, Steven J.B., Mitchell, Kieren J., Souilmi, Yassine, Cooper, Alan, Wilson, Don E. & Helgen, Kristofer M., 2019, The Dogma of Dingoes-Taxonomic status of the dingo: A reply to Smith et al, pp. 198-212 in Zootaxa 4564 (1) on page 203, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.7, http://zenodo.org/record/3713709

Files

figure.png

Files (1.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:07d0d03fa4e1df72215a6e7aef5da949
1.0 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.7 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFC1FF9EFFEDFFB0DE39FFC2961F614B (LSID)
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/3713709 (URL)