There is a newer version of the record available.

Published February 24, 2020 | Version v1.0
Dataset Open

Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

  • 1. Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
  • 2. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 3. Brown University, New Providence, RI, USA
  • 4. Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 5. State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Description

Datasets for the  Geoscientific Model Development publication: "Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)"

Abstract:  This paper presents global comparisons of fundamental global climate variables from a suite of four pairs of matched low- and high-resolution ocean and sea-ice simulations that are obtained following the OMIP-2 protocol (Griffies et al., 2016) and integrated for one cycle (1958-2018) of the JRA55-do atmospheric state and runoff dataset (Tsujino et al., 2018). Our goal is to assess the robustness of climate-relevant improvements in ocean simulations (mean and variability) associated with moving from coarse (~1º) to eddy-resolving (~0.1º) horizontal resolutions. The models are diverse in their numerics and parameterizations, but each low-resolution and high-resolution pair of models is matched so as to isolate, to the 20 extent possible, the effects of horizontal resolution. A variety of observational datasets are used to assess the fidelity of simulated temperature and salinity, sea surface height, kinetic energy, heat and volume transports, and sea ice distribution. This paper provides a crucial benchmark for future studies comparing and improving different schemes in any of the models used in this study or similar ones. The biases in the low-resolution simulations are familiar and their gross features – position, strength, and variability of western boundary currents, equatorial currents, and Antarctic Circumpolar Current – are 25 significantly improved in the high-resolution models. However, despite the fact that the high-resolution models “resolve’’ most of these features, the improvements in temperature or salinity are inconsistent among the different model families and some regions show increased bias over their low-resolution counterparts. Greatly enhanced horizontal resolution does not deliver unambiguous bias improvement in all regions for all models.

Files

README.txt

Files (771.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ccddf3ec1370d70b7896146feb7b2d86
78.9 MB Download
md5:cff8c85693f3ec1c00c3cb8d37af81cb
5.2 kB Download
md5:e968c0d22dccbd3f4cf42a91c59db220
101.1 MB Download
md5:c9f08969422543119406446b6355bbd4
3.3 kB Download
md5:31d3832cb411da766c28d55ead009619
65.9 MB Download
md5:173968e6a85e72900d21955636bf9e73
3.5 kB Download
md5:8038a92136e9ebf8202d1736a3fa212e
493.8 MB Download
md5:121882368c53e4e425a116b40eef0e46
2.8 kB Download
md5:a69e20a82f4c2b439f12f20314e1129e
31.7 MB Download
md5:a0aa9d8986883191c7c8f7902e4043fd
687 Bytes Download
md5:0b9e364d076db3ca0a00fc600f6b43c2
476 Bytes Preview Download
md5:f4c3bbb0cde7b7243e7aac42199489a2
55.9 kB Download
md5:7d973a61938424f68a03e9cfcad0f12f
2.4 kB Download