Published January 14, 2020 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Heterophoxus Shoemaker 1925

  • 1. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Decanato de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, UFRRJ, Rod. BR 465, Km 7, Seropédica, RJ, CEP 23890 - 000, Brazil.
  • 2. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Formação de Professores, Departamento de Ciências, Rua Dr. Francisco Portela, 1470, Patronato, São Gonçalo, RJ, CEP 24435 - 005, Brazil.

Description

Identification key to species of Heterophoxus of the world

1. Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner with an acute projection.................................................... 3

– Epimeral plate 3, posteroventral corner without projection............................................................. 2

2. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................ H. opus Griffiths, 1975

– Uropod 1, outer ramus much shorter than inner............................... H. cephalodens Griffiths, 1975

3. Epimeral plate 3, acute projection medium to long.......................................................................... 4

– Epimeral plate 3, acute projection short............................................. H. videns K.H. Barnard, 1930

4. Pereopod 7, basis reaching apex of merus........................................................................................ 5

– Pereopod 7, basis not reaching apex of merus.................................................................................. 7

5. Uropod 1, rami subequal................................................................................................................... 6

– Uropod 1, inner ramus about twice the length of outer.... H. pellusidus Ren in Ren & Huang, 1991

6. Uropod 2, peduncle longer than inner ramus........................ H. ophthalmicus (Schellenberg, 1925)

– Uropod 2, peduncle shorter than inner ramus................................ H. ellisi Jarret & Bousfield, 1994

7. Antenna 2, article 4 without posteroproximal lobe.......................................................................... 8

– Antenna 2, article 4 with posteroproximal lobe.......................................... H. despard Alonso, 2012

8. Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with moderate to strong excavation................................. 9

– Pereopod 4, coxa, posterodorsal margin with weak excavation........ H. pennatus Shoemaker, 1925

9. Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin without setules................................................................... 10

– Epimeral plates 1–3, posterior margin covered with setules......................... H. shoemakeri sp. nov.

10. Pereopod 7, merus stout, posterodistal lobe produced................... H. trichosus K.H. Barnard, 1932

– Pereopod 7, merus slender, posterodistal lobe not produced................. H. oculatus (Holmes, 1908)

Notes

Published as part of Andrade, Luiz F. & Senna, André R., 2020, A novel species of Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Phoxocephalidae) from southeast and southern Brazil, with an identification key to world species of the genus, pp. 1-16 in European Journal of Taxonomy 592 on page 14, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2020.592, http://zenodo.org/record/3626084

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0a92944e16b124c288c2b79edb2dda47
3.1 kB Download

System files (15.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b18631c8c6d50d452789c23be92c855c
15.0 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

URL
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/0382CF67FFF9103ACFC7D619D902FAF3
LSID
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B3D28885-EAEE-49E9-974C-528AB9B28BE7

Biodiversity

Family
Phoxocephalidae
Genus
Heterophoxus
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Shoemaker
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Heterophoxus Shoemaker, 1925 sec. Andrade & Senna, 2020

References

  • Griffiths C. L. 1975. The Amphipoda of Southern Africa Part 5. The Gammaridea and Caprellidea of the Cape Province west of Cape Agulhas. Annals of the South African Museum 67 (5): 91 - 181.
  • Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic (" Terra Nova ") Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 49462829 [accessed 20 Dec. 2019].
  • Ren X. & Huang L. 1991. Studies on Gammaridea and Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the northwest waters off the Antarctic Peninsula. Studia Marina Sinica 32: 185 - 323.
  • Jarret N. E. & Bousfield E. L. 1994. The amphipod superfamily Phoxocephaloidea on the pacific coast of North America. Family Phoxocephalidae. Part II. Subfamilies Pontharpiniinae, Paharpiniinae, Brolginae, Phoxocephalinae, and Harpiniinae. Systematics and distributional ecology. Amphipacifica 3 (4): 71 - 150.
  • Alonso G. M. 2012. Amphipod crustaceans (Corophiidea and Gammaridea) associated with holdfasts of Macrocystis pyrifera from the Beagle Channel (Argentina) and additional records from the Southwestern Atlantic. Journal of Natural History 46 (29 - 30): 1799 - 1894. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2012.692825