Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published June 29, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Bridges or Barriers? Conceptualization of the Role of Multiple Identity Gateway Groups in Intergroup Relations

  • 1. The School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel, Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 2. The School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel
  • 3. Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

Description

The modern era of globalization has been accompanied by a massive growth in interconnections between groups, and has led to the sharing of multiple identities by individuals and groups. Following these developments, research has focused on the issue of multiple identities, and has shed important light on how individuals who hold these complex forms of identity feel and behave, and on the reactions they elicit from members of other groups. However, the potential of groups with such multiple identities (e.g., biracials, immigrants, etc.) to affect the intergroup relations between the groups that represent the respective sources of the different identities (e.g., Blacks and Whites, country of origin and country of residence, etc.) has not been examined to date. Accordingly, in this paper, we first systematically explore the potential of groups in which people identify with multiple social categories, or groups that are perceived as such by others, to play a role in intergroup dynamics. Next, we offer a theoretical framework outlining what functions groups of people with shared multiple identities may serve (as bridges or barriers) by proposing how their presence may facilitate or deteriorate intergroup relations. Finally, we present recent empirical research examining how groups of people with shared multiple identities can act as gateways and bridge the cleft between two separate groups that represent the respective sources of their different identities, and discuss the theoretical and practical implications for the field of intergroup relations.

Files

fpsyg_08_01097.pdf

Files (572.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bd0634a5ac33d71907beed2eccd22f7d
572.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

EMOTIONS IN CONFLICT – Direct and Indirect Emotion Regulation as a New Path of Conflict Resolution 335607
European Commission