Published September 4, 2019 | Version v1

Votes from interactive polls

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Eawag - aquatic research

Description

Questions asked to participants during the workshop

  1. What is your area of work?
  2. Where are you working?
  3. What is more important in using monitoring data for assessing water quality impacts from CSOs?
  4. What regulation is better: simple or complex?
  5. What are current barriers against data sharing?
  6. If you make your CSO data transparent [what happens?]
  7. Would be a regulatory push (similar to EPA) effective in the EU?
  8. Where do you see biggest gap in CSO management?
  9. What instruments would you personally prefer to improve CSO management? [not polled]
  10. CSO in your region/city are: [how visible?]
  11. When existing, data on CSO are accessible [by whom?]
  12. An assessment of CSO at EU scale is in your opinion: [how useful?]
  13. If you want to make data public, at which level should it be provided?
  14. How important is a common data model and format?
  15. What is more important in using monitoring data for assessing water quality impacts from CSOs?
  16. Where do you see biggest gap in CSO management?
  17. What are your preferred next steps? [word cloud]

Files

SPN9 - CSO workshop_QuestionsAndVotes.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:619445210392718dc27f05268e0c786d
1.3 MB Preview Download
md5:7330de9a968b75dd954d86c88cc4bca3
18.6 kB Download