COMPARATIVE EXPERIENCE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCING SMALL ENTERPRISES
Description
The article considers existing criteria of estimation of financing subjects of small business in Germany and Russia for raising its effectiveness for Russia. We analyzed main directions and mechanisms of state support in these countries. The conducted analysis demonstrated that effectiveness indices of the activity of small enterprises in FGR essentially exceed analogous indices of the activity of enterprises of EU countries. A contribution, brought by small enterprises in the development of economy of Germany is just inestimable. For functioning and financing the activity of small enterprises in FGR, there were accepted correspondent normative acts, for example, the Trade code, one of which main statements is the following: family enterprises are encouraged in Germany by giving them the free access at markets, and there are different limitations for big enterprises. The parity of competitive flows is observed by prohibiting small business purchase for big enterprises – in Germany small enterprises are distinctly divided in dependent and independent by strict statistical accounting of these companies. The author denoted base state structures, curating programs for supporting small enterprises in Germany comparing with infrastructures, engaged for supporting subjects of small and middle business, existing in Russia. Unfortunately, program arrangements for supporting subjects of small business in RF don’t include special measures for supporting priority types of activity. The support is mainly directed on certain categories of citizens: unemployed, families with many children, youth and so on.
Files
COMPARATIVE EXPERIENCE OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCING SMALL ENTERPRISES.pdf
Files
(653.8 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:863480f074ab819720998cd234f61a9d
|
653.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- World Trade Organisation (1999). The results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts. Geneva.
- Cronin-Gilmore, J. (2009). Exploring marketing strategies for small businesses in the United States. Minneapolis: Northcentral University, 124.
- Miles, M. P., Darroch, J. (2006). Large firms, entrepreneurial marketing processes, and the cycle of competitive advantage. European Journal of Marketing, 40 (5/6), 485–501. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610657804
- Söllner, R. (2014). Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen in Deutschland. StatistischesBundesamt. Wirtschaftund Statistik, 40–51.
- Hills, G. E., Hultman, C. M., Miles, M. P. (2008). The Evolution and Development of Entrepreneurial Marketing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46 (1), 99–112. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2007.00234.x
- Schindehutte, M., Morris, M. H., Kocak, A. (2008). Understanding Market-Driving Behavior: The Role of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 46 (1), 4–26. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2007.00228.x
- Maurer, H. (1994). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. München.
- Bundeshaushaltsordnung. § 44 Zuwendungen, Verwaltung von Mitteln oder Vermögensgegenständen. Available at: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bho/__44.html
- Atherton, A., Kim, J. Y., Kim, H. (2010). Who's driving take-up? An examination of patterns of small business engagement with Business Link. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28 (2), 257–275. doi: http://doi.org/10.1068/c09152
- Strafgesetzbuch. § 264 Subventionsbetrug. Available at: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__264.html
- Federal Government Report on Research and Innovation 2010 (2010). Bonn, Berlin, 80. Available at: http://www.kooperation-international.de/fileadmin/redaktion/publication/BuFI_2010_Kurzfassung_englisch.pdf
- Gesetzüber die Grundsätze des Haushaltsrechts des Bundes und der Länder. Haushaltsgrundsätzegesetz. § 14 Zuwendungen. Available at: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/hgrg/__14.html