Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published July 8, 2019 | Version v2
Journal article Open

The Stock and Flowpaths of Organic Carbon in the Irrigated Rice Field from Imogiri Bantul D.I Yogyakarta Indonesia

  • 1. Assesment Institute for Agricultural Technology of Yogyakarta.
  • 2. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of agriculture, UGM
  • 3. Department of Environmental Geography, Faculty of Geography, UGM
  • 4. Indonesian Agricultural Environment Research Institute
  • 5. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of agriculture, UNS

Description

ABSTRACT

Soil organic carbon determines the quality, productivity and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Organic matter input and output are the processes that lead to the system’s sustainability from the perspective of organic carbon balance. Soil and crop management systems influence the return of organic carbon to the irrigated rice field. This study aimed to evaluate the recovery of soil organic carbon of irrigated rice fields treated with organic and conventional managemet systems. The study was conducted at Imogiri Bantul D.I. Yogyakarta Indonesia, to evaluate carbon dynamics (organic carbon inputs and losses) in irrigated rice fields under organic and conventional rice management systems. The organic rice management system in this study is defined as eliminating the use of agrochemical materials that are poisoning the environment and relying on the use of organic materials, while conventional rice systems are defined as relying on the use of agrochemical materials. The results showed that the Mentik Wangi organic rice produced 11.227 t.ha-1, while the conventional rice system produced 11.877 t.ha-1 dry biomass. The return of organic carbon were derived from organic fertilizer, rice stump and rice roots, while the carbon loss were caused by straw and grain removals. In the organic rice system, the total carbon input (recycled) was 7.161 t.ha-1, while the output (removal) was 6.194 t.ha-1, implying a sustainable system with a greather input than the output. On the contrary, in the conventional rice system, the total carbon input was 4.946 t.ha-1, while the loss was 6.931 t.ha-1, implying carbon deficits which my lead to unsustainability.

Files

Arif Anshari.pdf

Files (740.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:444fb707b7db60d42deb3c07f8de4639
411.7 kB Preview Download
md5:677b67de445b6937a467b2fe48a1f91d
329.1 kB Preview Download