Library Publishing and Open Educational Resources: challenges and opportunities for teachers
- 1. Universidade de São Paulo
- 2. Universidade Aberta
Description
The participation of libraries in the processes of publication of monographs in the humanities and the social sciences is a growing phenomenon of dissemination and access to academic-scientific communication triggered in universities, establishing library publishing by practice and expanding it in the search for innovative solutions of cost-effective for authors in those institutions. The performance of editorial activities often adds to the expertise of professional editors from the institution press itself, or from librarians who need to build up such characteristics. The model supported by OA and complemented by CC licenses presents challenges to the institutions besides the development and sustainability of book-oriented library publishing, namely composition, high cost of editorial production and the distinctive distribution chain, which also makes it possible to trade content in another format. This paper intends to present a set of features needed to start this service in institutions that have not yet adopted it, like fostering an approach between teachers and librarians, for example through meetings or training. Thus, it is relevant to reflect on the opportunities and challenges that those different educational actors face, namely teachers. In this context, OER emerge as key elements, aligned not only with the principles of OA but also those of Open Science. OER have been perceived as “teaching, learning and research materials in any medium, digital or otherwise, that reside in the public domain or have been released under an open license that permits no-cost access, use, adaptation and redistribution by others with no or limited restrictions. Open licensing is built within the existing framework of intellectual property rights as defined by relevant international conventions and respects the authorship of the work.(UNESCO, 2012:1) Therefore, OER can contribute to address the topics of quality, innovation, access, cost and dissemination, among others, posed by library publishing.
Files
Library_ Publishing_and_ Open_ Educational_ Resources_Rosa_Cardoso.pdf
Files
(486.6 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:46a59c30ce505a75af28d19835b21c3b
|
486.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Amiel, T. (2013). Identifying barriers to the remix of translated open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open And Distributed Learning, 14(1), 126-144. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1351/2448 [March 03 2019].
- Anderson, R. (2019). Why you should care about open access: an open letter to scholarly and scientific authors. The Scholarly kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/02/21/why-youshould- care-about-open-access-an-open-letter-to-scholarly-and-scientificauthors/? utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScholarlyKitch en+%28The+Scholarly+Kitchen%29. [February 21 2019].
- Balbachevsky, E. (2005). A pós-graduação no Brasil novos desafios para uma política bem-sucedida. In: Schwartzman, S.; Brock, C., editores. Os desafios da educação no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2005. p.275-304. https://portais.ufg.br/up/67/o/Pos-Graduacao_Brasil_2.pdf. [January 10 2019].
- Brasil. (2019). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES. http://www.capes.gov.br/. [January 30 2019].
- Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES. 2009. Roteiro para classificação de livros. Avaliação dos programas de pós-graduação. https://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/avaliacao/Roteiro_livros_Trienio2007_2009.p df. [February 26 2019].
- Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. CAPES. 2016. Considerações sobre classificação de livros. https://capes.gov.br/images/documentos/classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_livros_2017/46_ENSI_cl ass_livros_jan2017.pdf. [January 30 2019].
- BRASIL. Universidade de São Paulo. 2019. Portal de Livros da USP. http://www.livrosabertos.sibi.usp.br/portaldelivrosUSP. [February 11 2019].
- BRASIL. Universidade de São Paulo. 2019. Portal de Revistas da USP. http://www.revistas.usp.br/wp/. [February 14 2019].
- Cardoso, T. e Pestana, F. (2018). Wikipédia, um Recurso Educacional Aberto? EmRede - Revista de Educação a Distância, 5(2), pp. 300-3018. https://www.aunirede.org.br/revista/index.php/emrede/article/view/337/332 [March 07 2019].
- Downes, S. (2006). Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources. http://www.downes.ca/post/33401 [February 21 2019].
- Fenlon, K.S. 2017. Understanding the needs of scholars in a contemporary publishing environment. The journal of Electronic Publishing, v.20, n.2. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0020.219. [January 15 2019].
- Tonks, D., Weston, S., Wiley, D. e Barbour, M. (2013). "Opening" a new kind of school: The story of the Open High School of Utah. The International Review of Research in Open And Distributed Learning, 14(1), pp. 255- 271. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1345/2419 [February 02 2019].
- UNESCO (2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/WPFD2009/English_Declaration.html [March 09 2019].
- Wiley, D. (2006). The Current State of Open Educational Resources. http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/247 [February 02 2019].
- Wiley, D. (2010). Open Education and Future. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Rb0syrgsH6M#! [February 22 2019].
- Wiley, D. e Green, C. (2012) 'Why openness in education?' In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies, pp. 81–89. Educause. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub72036.pdf [February 22 2019].
- Wiley, D. (2013). On quality and OER. http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2947 [February 02 2019].