KEBIJAKAN PEMBINAAN ATLET PUSAT PENDIDIKAN DAN LATIHAN PELAJAR DINAS KEPEMUDAAN DAN OLAH RAGA PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA

Jamarudin¹ Bahtiar² dan Jopang³

¹Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Ilmu Administrasi Publik UHO

^2,3Dosen Program Studi Ilmu  Administrasi Publik Program Pascasarjana UHO

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to know the policy of coaching athletes Education Center and Student Exercises (PPLP) Department of Youth and Sports in Southeast Sulawesi Province and factors affecting the implementation of the policy. This study used a qualitative approach. Engineering data collection done by the method of document analysis and interviews with informants consisted of representative elements: (1) Responsible youth and Sports Office of PPLP Province Southeast Sulawesi, (2) Chairman PPLP, Coordinator (3). The fields of infrastructure, (4). Coordinator of Field Coaching, (5). Coordinator of the academic field, (6). Coordinator General, Field (7). Dorm Fhui Coordinator, (8). Element trainers (9) Assistant coach and Athlete PPLP (10). The technique of data analysis performed through the stages of data presentation, data reduction and verification/conclusion.

The results showed that in general the policy construction of athletes that includes planning, organizing, training programs and infrastructure, recruitment of athletes and coaches, academic system and funding has not yet been fully implemented by either. Of the seven policy dimensions measured policy exercise program, recruitment of athletes and coaches, as well as an academic system, has done well while the planning policy, organizing and infrastructure, as well as funding, runs as expected. This is caused by the policy of coaching athletes PPLP yet implement consistently the whole system approach based on policy criteria of resources (inputs) and internal process approach. Factor skill (skill techniques, skills and conceptual skills of human relationships) is not yet fully owned by PPLP, weak oversight of the institution above the PPLP and administrators who do not yet have a strong moral incentive to use the budgetary resources proportionately in a transparent and accountable.