Dataset Open Access
Josje Verhagen; Rianne van den Berghe; Ora Oudgenoeg; Aylin Kuntay; Paul Leseman
This study assessed whether four- to six-year-old children (i) differed in their weighing of non-verbal cues (pointing, eye gaze) and verbal cues provided by a robot versus a human; (ii) weighed non-verbal cues differently depending on whether these contrasted with a novel or familiar label; and (iii) relied differently on a robot’s nonverbal cues depending on the degree to which they attributed human-like properties to the robot. The results showed that children generally followed pointing over labeling, in line with earlier research. Children did not rely more strongly on the non-verbal cues of a robot versus those of a human. Regarding pointing, children who perceived the robot as human-like relied on pointing more strongly when it contrasted with a novel label versus a familiar label, but children who perceived the robot as less human-like did not show this difference. Regarding eye gaze, children relied more strongly on the gaze cue when it contrasted with a novel versus a familiar label, and no effect of anthropomorphism was found. Taken together, these results show no difference in the degree to which children rely on non-verbal cues of a robot versus those of a human and provide preliminary evidence that differences in anthropomorphism may interact with children’s reliance on a robot’s non-verbal behaviors.
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
Data_Robot Human Nonverbal Cues_PLoS ONE_2019.txt
md5:fc525e26254126fb4be065240084021d |
222.1 kB | Download |
Script_Robot Human Nonverbal Cues_PLoS ONE.R
md5:bf0bb01c906fb75f83c9c58c7d51466a |
4.7 kB | Download |
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 131 | 131 |
Downloads | 47 | 47 |
Data volume | 6.1 MB | 6.1 MB |
Unique views | 121 | 121 |
Unique downloads | 36 | 36 |