Published February 28, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Long-term cloud condensation nuclei number concentration, particle number size distribution and chemical composition measurements at regionally representative observatories

  • 1. 1Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
  • 2. 2Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
  • 3. 3Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council of Italy, Via Piero Gobetti, 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
  • 4. 4Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584 Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • 5. 5Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströminkatu 2, 00560 Helsinki, Finland
  • 6. 7Laboratory for Meteorological Physics (LaMP), Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • 7. 8School of Physics and CCAPS, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland
  • 8. 9Multiphase Chemistry and Biogeochemistry Departments, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
  • 9. 10Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1371, CEP 05508-090, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • 10. 11Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Voutes, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
  • 11. 12Department of Physics, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
  • 12. 13Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO80305, USA
  • 13. 14Department of Atmospheric Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
  • 14. 15Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • 15. 17Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
  • 16. 19Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, Petten, the Netherlands
  • 17. 21School of Chemical&Biomolecular Engineering and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0340, USA
  • 18. the Netherlands
  • 19. 9Multiphase Chemistry and Biogeochemistry Departments, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Ge

Description

Aerosol–cloud interactions (ACI) constitute the
single largest uncertainty in anthropogenic radiative forcing.
To reduce the uncertainties and gain more confidence in the
simulation of ACI, models need to be evaluated against observations,
in particular against measurements of cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN). Here we present a data set – ready
to be used for model validation – of long-term observations
of CCN number concentrations, particle number size distributions
and chemical composition from 12 sites on 3 continents.
Studied environments include coastal background, rural
background, alpine sites, remote forests and an urban surrounding.
Expectedly, CCN characteristics are highly variable
across site categories. However, they also vary within
them, most strongly in the coastal background group, where
CCN number concentrations can vary by up to a factor of 30
within one season. In terms of particle activation behaviour,
most continental stations exhibit very similar activation ratios
(relative to particles >20 nm) across the range of 0.1 to
1.0% supersaturation. At the coastal sites the transition from
particles being CCN inactive to becoming CCN active occurs
over a wider range of the supersaturation spectrum.
Several stations show strong seasonal cycles of CCN number
concentrations and particle number size distributions,
e.g. at Barrow (Arctic haze in spring), at the alpine stations
(stronger influence of polluted boundary layer air masses in
summer), the rain forest (wet and dry season) or Finokalia
(wildfire influence in autumn). The rural background and urban
sites exhibit relatively little variability throughout the
year, while short-term variability can be high especially at
the urban site.
The average hygroscopicity parameter, , calculated from
the chemical composition of submicron particles was highest
at the coastal site of Mace Head (0.6) and lowest at the rain
forest station ATTO (0.2–0.3).We performed closure studies
based on –Köhler theory to predict CCN number concentrations.
The ratio of predicted to measured CCN concentrations
is between 0.87 and 1.4 for five different types of .
The temporal variability is also well captured, with Pearson
correlation coefficients exceeding 0.87.
Information on CCN number concentrations at many locations
is important to better characterise ACI and their radiative
forcing. But long-term comprehensive aerosol particle
characterisations are labour intensive and costly. Hence, we
recommend operating “migrating-CCNCs” to conduct collocated
CCN number concentration and particle number size
distribution measurements at individual locations throughout
one year at least to derive a seasonally resolved hygroscopicity
parameter. This way, CCN number concentrations can
only be calculated based on continued particle number size
distribution information and greater spatial coverage of longterm
measurements can be achieved.

Files

Schmale et al. ACP 2018.pdf

Files (3.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dcace2b3e1c74d0b0feb3a8372fd0205
3.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

ACTRIS-2 – Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure 654109
European Commission