Treatment outcome in patients with breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for breast carcinoma – a single institution experience

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in comparison to radical mastectomy (RM) after NAT in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and patients' satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes of surgery.

METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at the National Cancer Research Center of Serbia, Belgrade, from January 1st 2011 to December 31st 2015, on breast carcinoma patients receiving NAT. Treatment outcome was assessed by MDAPI (MD Anderson Prognostic Index). Female patients (n=52) with satisfactory clinical response to NAT and MDAPI scores 0 or 1 were included into the treatment group (NAT-BCS group). The control group (NAT-RM group) consisted of patients (n=52) with poorer clinical response and MDAPI scores 2 to 4. On check-ups, local or distant relapses were noted and both groups were asked to value their satisfaction with the esthetic outcomes of surgery using the Likert scale.

RESULTS: OS was 100% in both groups. DFS was 96.1% in NAT-BCS group and 100% in NAT-RM group. Local recurrences were observed in two patients from the age group ≥60 years, with initial disease stage IIIA and "clear" resection margins on frozen section study. Patients in the NAT-BCS group were more satisfied with the esthetic outcome of surgery than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS: BCS after NAT provides good esthetic outcome and is oncologically safe if adequate clinical response is achieved after NAT and if established criteria for patient selection are followed.