Book section Open Access
Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change?
Martin Haspelmath
This paper addresses a recent trend in the study of language variation and universals, namely to attribute cross-linguistic patterns to diachrony, rather than to other causal factors. This is an interesting suggestion, and I try to make the basic concepts clearer, by distinguishing clearly between language-particular regularities, universal tendencies, and mere recurrent patterns, as well as three kinds of causal factors (preferences, constraints, restrictions). I make four claims: (i) Explanations may involve diachrony in different ways; (ii) for causal explanations of universal tendencies, one needs to invoke mutational constraints (change constraints); (iii) in addition to mutational constraints, we need functional-adaptive constraints as well, as is clear from cases of multi-convergence; and (iv) successful functional-adaptive explanations do not depend on understanding the precise pathways of change.
| All versions | This version | |
|---|---|---|
| Views | 401 | 399 |
| Downloads | 186 | 186 |
| Data volume | 36.9 MB | 36.9 MB |
| Unique views | 353 | 351 |
| Unique downloads | 170 | 170 |
- Publication date:
- March 5, 2019
- DOI:
-
- ISBN:
- 978-3-96110-147-4
- Published in:
- Explanation in typology, Language Science Press, Berlin, pp. 1-23 (978-3-96110-147-4).
- Communities:
- License (for files):
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International