Published October 2, 2018 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Robustness analysis of the next generation of EGR controllers in marine two-stroke diesel engines

  • 1. Vehicular Systems, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

Description

Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) has recently been introduced in large marine two-stroke diesel engines to reduce NOx emissions. During accelerations, controlling the amount of EGR flow while still keeping good acceleration performance can be quite challenging. The main difficulties to overcome are the delay in the scavenge receiver oxygen measurement and the upper limit in the amount of fuel that can be burned with EGR diluted air without producing black smoke. Previous oxygen feedback controllers struggled during accelerations, but a new approach to EGR control based on adaptive feedforward (AFF) has been tested successfully. Nevertheless,further analysisandtestsarerequiredbeforedeployingthenewcontrollertomoreEGRships. A simulation platform is a great asset to test the controllers before expensive and time-limited real-world experiments have to be conducted on board of ships. With this purpose, a new EGR flow controller is introduced to track the AFF controller EGR flow setpoint in a complete ship simulation model. This new EGR controller complements the previous AFF controller and determines the control signals of the engine EGR blowers. Several acceleration scenarios are simulated, and they identify the low load area as the most challenging concerning EGR control performance due to the slower air path engine dynamics. Controller robustness in this low load area against errors in the flow estimates used by the controller is analysed. Pressure sensor bias in the EGR flow estimator is identified as the most critical factor, which could lead to black smoke formation. This issue could be prevented with better sensor calibration or by using a differential pressure sensor in the estimator instead of two absolute pressure sensors. Errors in the parameters of the flow estimators do not affect the performance as much. This is a useful result because, for a newly built engine, the right parameters of the flow estimators might be difficult to obtain. 

Files

ISCSS 2018 Paper 028 Llamas FINAL.pdf

Files (3.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0dcbd40e0382c2efc11d8756e4de1162
3.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Ammann, M., Fekete, N. P., Guzzella, L., Glattfelder, A. H., 2003. Model-based control of the VGT and EGR in aturbochargedcommon-raildieselengine: Theoryandpassengercarimplementation.In: SAETechnicalPaper 2003-01-0357. SAE International.
  • Åström, K. J., Hägglund, T., 2006. Advanced PID Control. ISA - Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society.
  • International Maritime Organization, 2013. MARPOL: Annex VI and NTC 2008, 2013: with Guidelines for Implementation. IMO.
  • Llamas, X., Eriksson, L., 2017. Control-oriented modeling of two-stroke diesel engines with EGR for marine applications. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. M: Journal of engineering for the maritime environmentSubmitted.
  • Nielsen, K. V., Blanke, M., Eriksson, L., 2017a. Adaptive observer for nonlinearly parameterized hammerstein system with sensor delay–applied to ship emissions reduction. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.
  • Nielsen, K. V., Blanke, M., Eriksson, L., Vejlgaard-Laursen, M., 2016. Diesel engine control system to meet strict emission requirements while maintaining full ship manoeuvring capability. Applied EnergySubmitted.
  • Nielsen, K. V., Blanke, M., Eriksson, L., Vejlgaard-Laursen, M., 2017b. Adaptive feedforward control of exhaust recirculation in large diesel engines. Control Engineering Practice 65, 26 – 35.
  • Nielsen,K.V.,Blanke,M.,Eriksson,L.,Vejlgaard-Laursen,M.,2017c.Control-orientedmodelofmolarscavenge oxygen fraction for exhaust recirculation in large diesel engines. ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. 139 (2).
  • Nieuwstadt,M.,Kolmanovsky,I.,Moraal,P.,Stefanopoulou,A.,Jankovic,M.,2000.EGR-VGTcontrolschemes: experimental comparison for a high-speed diesel engine. IEEE Control Systems Mag. 20 (3), 63–79.
  • Vejlgaard-Laursen, M., Olesen, H., 2016. Controlling tier III technologies. In: 28th CIMAC World Congress on Combustion Engine.
  • Xiros, N., 2002. Robust Control of Diesel Ship Propulsion. Springer-Verlag London.