Published October 3, 2018 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Efficient Procurement of Low Vulnerability Warships

  • 1. Survivability Consulting Limited, Dunfermline, UK

Description

In recent decades the UK has made significant advances in its approach to, and its results from, the management of naval platform vulnerability. This paper explores the history, guiding principles and assessment techniques of successful vulnerability management.

World War II lessons learned are reviewed and shown to be still relevant today. These include structural and systems design features for the management of blast and fragmentation.

Requirements must be set which are realistic and contractual. Through the design of several classes of ship using current vulnerability management principles it is now clear what can be achieved. Therefore realistic requirements can be effectively set.

Quantitative vulnerability assessment is a key part of the design process, from the earliest concept to build and beyond. It is never too early to consider vulnerability, as the biggest gains can be made for the least cost during the early concept phases. However, early promise can be compromised by careless addition of supporting systems and services, so continuous monitoring is required.

In order for vulnerability assessments to keep pace with and guide the direction of the developing design, efficient assessment tools are needed. If the model takes too long to build, the tool offers purely an audit function, rather than being a design aid. Such a tool is also an important input to Operational Analysis of the in-service fleet. As such, very large parameter spaces of results are needed, for the full threat spectrum against the whole fleet in a range of scenarios.

SCL has developed the Purple Fire tool to facilitate the sorts of assessment required for modern platform designs, weapon programmes and operational analysis in support of the fleet. It provides the analyst with the ability to construct platform representations very quickly, meaning less model build time and more analysis time. It automates the consideration of large parameter spaces allowing in-depth assessments to be conducted quicker than ever. 

Files

INEC 2018 Paper 035 Schofield FINAL.pdf

Files (3.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0bff13d7bb5daaea5d38bbbca163f58e
3.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Director of Naval Construction, "Notes on damage caused by enemy action and lessons learned during the first year of war Sept 3rd 1939-Sept 2nd 1940", ADM 267/141, November 1940.
  • Director of Naval Construction, "Notes on damage caused by enemy action and lessons learned during the second year of war Sept 3rd 1940-Sept 2nd 1941", ADM 267/142, 1941.
  • Director of Naval Construction, "Notes on damage caused by enemy action and lessons learned during the third year of war Sept 3rd 1941-Sept 2nd 1942", ADM 267/143, 1942.
  • Director of Naval Construction, "Notes on damage caused by enemy action and lessons learned during the fourth year of war Sept 3rd 1942-Sept 2nd 1943", ADM 267/144, 1943.
  • Naval Construction Research Establishment, "Underwater Explosion Trials against HMS Jervis in Lock Striven", NCRE/R88, March 1949.
  • Naval Construction Research Establishment, "HMS Obdurate Report of Damage Sustained during NCRE Investigation TF13 (Bulkhead Trial)", DGShips/XCI/IOI/C33A, October 1964.