Published August 28, 2025
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Integrating national and international ecosystem typologies for condition assessments: Principles for typology design and policy alignment
Creators
- 1. King Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
- 2. space4environment, Niederanven, Luxembourg
- 3. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway
Description
This study presents an overview of the integration of national, European and global ecosystem typologies used in European countries to support ecosystem condition assessments and policy reporting obligations. The aim is to understand the development and integration of ecosystem typologies for assessing ecosystems at national level, both under obligatory EU reporting requirements and beyond, in support of the European Union (EU) implementation of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). Based on the review of literature and a comprehensive survey, the progress in ecosystem typologies development, condition assessment and data sources were identified for thirty-one countries (EU27 countries, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Norway and Israel). Additionally, the study provides an overview of European/global ecosystem typologies, habitat classifications and land-cover classification systems, tracing their evolution and highlighting their role in addressing global environmental challenges. National level typologies, constituting around 52% of the typologies identified, were found to be compatible with at least one international typology, such as the European Nature Information System (EUNIS) or the land-cover typology of Coordination of Information on the Environment (CORINE) and the ecosystem typology applied by the EU Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) initiative. The study discusses principles for designing condition-enabled ecosystem typologies, emphasising the use of ecologically homogeneous classes supported by functional definitions, that are also practical operationalisable at appropriate spatial and temporal scales. It also highlights the crucial role of crosswalks in linking different typologies for international comparability. The integration of national, European/global ecosystem typologies is essential for advancing ecosystem assessment and management efforts, considering their growing relevance in policy- and decision-making within countries and international bodies, such as the United Nations and the EU.
Files
OE_article_163068.pdf
Files
(892.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b1299293ff99cdf97ef3239044a523ac
|
892.1 kB | Preview Download |
System files
(171.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c2a9fb3378c42d639d79659ff3906ad2
|
171.9 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
References
- Arnold S, Kosztra B, Banko G, Milenov P, Smith G, Hazeu G, Bock M, Caetano M, Perger C, Mancosu E (2023) Explanatory Documentation of the EAGLE Concept-Version 3.2.
- Bogaart P, Chan JY, Horlings H, Keith D, Larson T, Sayre R, Schenau S, Soulard F (2019) SEEA EEA Revision Expert Consultation Working group 1: Spatial units Discussion paper 1.1: An ecosystem type classification for the SEEA EEA.
- Bölöni J, Molnár Z, Illyés E, Kun A (2007) A New Habitat Classification and Manual for Standardized Habitat Mapping. Annali di Botanica 1: 55‑76. https://doi.org/10.4462/annbotrm-9085
- Brander LM, Lange S, Mechurová K, Reichel S, Rendón P, Seguin J, van 't Hoff V, Watson M (2024) SELINA D6.2. Operational Database: Ecosystem AsseSsment Explorer (EASE).
- Capotorti G, Del Vico E, Copiz R, Falconi L, et al. (2023) Ecosystems of Italy. Updated mapping typology for the implementation of national and international biodiversity-related policies. Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 157 (6): 1248‑1258.
- Council of the European Communities (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Union. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31992L0043
- Czúcz B, Lappalainen M, Jernberg S, Korpinen S (2025) SELINA D3.3 Report on definition of reference conditions that describe good ecosystem condition.
- Davies CE, Moss D, Hill MO (2004) EUNIS Habitat Classification Revised 2004.
- Dimitrakopoulos P, Troumbis A (2019) Biotopes. Encyclopedia of Ecology359‑365. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10923-6
- Esseen A, Glimskär A, Ståhl G, Sundquist S (2007) Field Instruction for the national inventory of the landscape in Sweden (NILS).
- European Commission (2011) Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 (COM(2011) 244 final). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0244
- European Commission (2020) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. COM(2020) 380 final. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52020DC0380
- European Commission (2022) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL Amending Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 as Regards Introducing New Environmental Economic Accounts Modules. URL: https://eur-lex. europa. eu/legal-content/EN/TXT
- European Environment Agency (EEA) (2019) EUNIS habitat classification. EUNIS – European Nature Information System. URL: https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats.jsp
- European Environment Agency (EEA) (2021) Copernicus Land Monitoring Service CORINE Land Cover User Manual. URL: https://land.copernicus.eu/
- European Parliament (2007) Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Official Journal of the European Union. L 108, 1–14. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32007L0002
- European Parliament (2011) Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2011 on European environmental economic accounts. Official Journal of the European Union. (L 192/1).
- European Parliament (2018) REGULATION (EU) 2018/841 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU. Official Journal of the European Union. L 156/1. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/841/oj/eng
- European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity (ETC/BD) (2015) A crosswalk between EUNIS habitats Classification and Corine Land Cover EUNIS Code level EUNIS Name CLC Code CLC Name. URL: http://biodiversity.eionet.europa.eu
- European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869. Official Journal of the European Union. 1991 (2024), 1.
- EUROSTAT (2017) LUCAS: The EU's land use and land cover survey – 2017 edition (KS-01-17-069-EN-N). Publications Office of the European Union. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c9e3bf6a-d970-11e7-a506-01aa75ed71a1
- EUROSTAT (2023) Guidance Note on Ecosystem Extent Accounts. URL: https://seea.un.org/content/guidance-note-ecosystem-extent-accounts
- EUROSTAT (2024a) EU ecosystem typology: Supplementary document to ENV/EA/TF/2024_3/2a. Directorate-General for Environment, Task Force on Ecosystem Accounting.
- EUROSTAT (2024b) Environmental accounts - establishing the links between the environment and the economy. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Environmental_accounts_-_establishing_the_links_between_the_environment_and_the_economy#Introduction_to_environmental_accounting
- Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS) (2021a) Environmental-Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounts. National Ecosystem Classification for Germany.
- Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS) (2021b) Umweltökonomische Gesamtrechnungen. Methode der Flächenbilanzierung der Ökosysteme.
- Framstad E, Stabbetorp OE (2021) Arealrepresentativ naturovervåking (ANO): Design og gjennomføring av overvåking av terrestriske økosystemer. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA). URL: https://www.nina.no
- Framstad E, Austrheim G, Evju M, Johansen L, et al. (2022) Avgrensing og inndeling av terrestriske hovedøkosystemer i arbeidet med økologisk tilstand.
- Halvorsen R, Bryn A, Erikstad L (2016) NiNs systemkjerne – teori, prinsipper og inndelingskriterier.
- Huber N, Ginzler C, Pazur R, Descombes P, Baltensweiler A, Ecker K, Meier E, Price B (2022) Countrywide classification of permanent grassland habitats at high spatial resolution. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 9 (1): 133‑151. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.298
- Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Kemppainen E, Uddström A, Liukko UM (Eds) (2019) The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 704 p.
- Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel (INPN) (2016) L'inventaire des Zones Naturelles d'Intérêt Écologique, Faunistique et Floristique ZNIEFF. Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel INPN, Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle MNHN. URL: https://inpn.mnhn.fr/programme/inventaire-znieff/presentation?lg=fr
- Keith DA, Ferrer-Paris JR, Nicholson E, Kingsford RT (2020) IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0 Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups.
- Littell J (2018) Conceptual and practical classification of research reviews and other evidence synthesis products. Campbell Systematic Reviews 14 (1): 1‑21. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2018.1
- Lyche Solheim A, Globevnik L, Austnes K, Kristensen P, Moe SJ, Persson J, Phillips G, Poikane S, van de Bund W, Birk S (2019) A new broad typology for rivers and lakes in Europe: Development and application for large-scale environmental assessments. Science of The Total Environment 697 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134043
- Lydon K, Smith G (2023) National Land Cover Map of Ireland 2018 Final Report. Technical report, Tailte Éireann in partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and with the support of members of the cross-governmental national land cover and habitat mapping (NLCHM) working group.
- Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Liquete C, et al. (2013) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Condé S, et al. (2020) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services : an EU wide ecosystem assessment in support of the EU biodiversity strategy. Publications Office of the European Union, Ispra. EUR 30161 EN. 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-178330. https://doi.org/10.2760/757183,JRC120383
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food (2022) Methodological explanation for RABA – Land Use Database, Slovenia.
- Moss D (2008) EUNIS habitat classification – a guide for users. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. European Environment Agency.
- Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic (2023) Consolidated Layer of Ecosystems - version 2022. URL: https://metadata.nature.cz/en/record/basic/63c80cbb-5824-4895-8651- 755a10a020812
- Norwegian Environment Agency (NEA) (2018) Veileder 02: 2018. Klassifisering av miljøtilstand i vann. Økologisk og kjemisk klassifiseringssystem for kystvann, grunnvann, innsjøer og elver (p. 220). Norwegian Environement Agency, Norway. Direktoratsgruppa Vanndirektivet.
- Nygaard B, Damgaard C, Nielsen KE, Bladt J. Ejrnæs R (2016) Terrestriske naturtyper 2004-2015. NOVANA. Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi, 1201 s. - Netrapport fra DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi. URL: www.novana.dk
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008) OECD glossary of statistical terms. OECD Publishing. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-glossary-of-statistical-terms_9789264055087-en.html
- Payet K, Rouget M, Esler K, Reyers B, Rebelo T, Thompson MW, Vlok JHJ (2013) Effect of Land Cover and Ecosystem Mapping on Ecosystem‐Risk Assessment in the Little Karoo, South Africa. Conservation Biology 27 (3): 531‑541. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12065
- Peters A, Watson M, Giangnacovo L, Smets B, Quiñones M, Barbulo D, Kooij B, Gil A, Bernando F, Dimpopoulos P, Kokkoris IP (2025) SELINA D5.2 Enhancing the spatial and temporal resolution of ecosystem accounts using satellite data.
- Price B, Huber N, Ginzler C, Pazúr R, Rüetschi M (2021) The habitat map of Switzerland v1. Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
- Rendon P, Watson M, Ruf K, Peters A, Kleeschulte S, Santos F (2023) SELINA D3.1. Integrating data streams to define and map ecosystem types.
- Rotem D, Weil G (2014) Natural Ecosystem-Units in Israel and the Palestinian Authority - Representativeness in Protected Areas and Suggested Solutions for Biodiversity Conservation. Journal of Landscape Ecology 7 (1): 91‑109. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2014-0011
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2011) Convention on Biological Diversity. URL: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
- Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment (2014) Ecosystems and Biodiversity for human wellbeing. Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment. Synthesis of key findings.
- Ståhl G, Allard A, Esseen P, Glimskär A, Ringvall A, Svensson J, Sundquist S, Christensen P, Torell Å, Högström M, Lagerqvist K, Marklund L, Nilsson B, Inghe O (2010) National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS)—scope, design, and experiences from establishing a multiscale biodiversity monitoring system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 173: 579‑595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1406-7
- SYKE (2019) The status assessment of habitat types in Finland. Finnish Environment Institute and Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki. The Finnish Environment 2/2019. 254 p. Kontula, T. & Raunio, A. (eds). Threatened Habitat Types in Finland 2018. Red List of Habitats – Results and Basis for Assessment. URL: https://luontotyyppienuhanalaisuus.ymparisto.fi/lutu/#/
- Tanács E, Belényesi M, Lehoczki R, Pataki R, Petrik O, Standovár T, Pásztor L, Laborczi A, Szatmári G, Molnár Z, Bede-Fazekas Á, Somodi I, Kristóf D, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Török K, Kisné Fodor L, Zsembery Z, Friedl Z, Maucha G (2021) Compiling a high-resolution country-level ecosystem map to support environmental policy: methodological challenges and solutions from Hungary. Geocarto International 37 (25): 8746‑8769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2005158
- United Nations (2021) System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). White cover publication, pre-edited text subject to official editing. URL: https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting
- Urban DL, O'Neill RV, Shugart HH (1987) Landscape ecology: A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37 (2): 119‑127.
- Vallecillo S, Maes J, Teller A, Babí Almenar J, et al. (2022) EU-wide methodology to map and assess ecosystem condition: Towards a common approach consistent with a global statistical standard. https://doi.org/10.2760/13048
- Vári Á, Adamescu C, Balzan M, Gocheva K, Götzl M, Grunewald K, Inácio M, Linder M, Obiang-Ndong G, Pereira P, Santos-Martin F, Sieber I, Stępniewska M, Tanács E, Termansen M, Tromeur E, Vačkářová D, Czúcz B (2024) National mapping and assessment of ecosystem services projects in Europe – Participants' experiences, state of the art and lessons learned. Ecosystem Services 65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101592
- Velev N, Apostolova I, Sopotlieva D, Vassilev V, et al. (2017) Methodology for assessment and mapping of heathland and shrub ecosystems condition and their services in Bulgaria. Clorind. Sofia. Part B5.
- Weiss M, Banko G (2018) Ecosystem Type Map v3.1. Terrestrial and marine ecosystems with an ETC/ULS UAB contribution from Raquel Ubach and an ETC/ULS UMA contribution from Ana Isabel Marin. URL: http://bd.eionet.europa.eu