Logik

Abstract

The so called "mathematical logic" is, despite opposing claims, practically useless, due to its inability to consider semantics!
Hence, it is only possible to constitute ordinary, "atomic" phrases in simplest forms, that are supposed to look like mathematical formulas, but eventually  have nothing in common with true mathematics.
Furthermore, those reduced constructs can only be processed in pairs and brought into an interrelationship by the two operators "true" and "false",
- In which the statements "true" or "false" are of random nature and thus left for personal interpretation.
- Whereas in three quarters of all cases, intentionally (but without any necessity or sense) wrong premises are initially inserted, to make this whole "show-construct" look like it bares something that actually has to be calculated.

In other words, the lingual constituted logic is highly superior to the mathematical one.
The mathematical logic could be better, far more precise respectively, therefore though,
- the use of arithmetic operators (numbers and digits) would be required, rather than the previously mentioned "logical operators"
- Also, it needs more than a "two-valued" logic, which can not be solely accomplished by the "true"-"false" terms, but by a natural-linguistic intended logic and by the interconnection of arithmetic counted statements.                          

The mathematical logic's primary purpose seems to be found in that the clusters of practical informatics are built up according to it.
In fact, this is only an apparent use, because the clusters also function without this alleged logical designation.
More specifically, vice versa the logical termination is built up after the clusters, for which sheer "word-monsters" are constructed (XOR, etc.).