Conference paper Open Access

RehabMove 2018: ARE INDIVIDUALS WITH UNILATERAL TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTATION ABLE TO ADAPT TO AN ACUTE PROSTHETIC INTERVENTION?

De Asha, A.R.; Foster, R.J.; Skervin, T.; Barnett, C.T.

PURPOSE: Individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation (UTA) are known to minimise internal
extension moments at the residual knee during running, in order to reduce discomfort in the residuum and
reduce in-socket torques. When a running specific prosthesis (RSP) is altered or replaced, e.g. varying its
stiffness, it is unknown whether individuals with UTA can quickly adapt to the perturbation, modulating
moments at the residual knee in order to protect the residuum, or if such adaptations require an extended
accommodation period. The purpose of this study was to investigate acute adaptations to a change in
RSP stiffness in individuals with UTA.
METHODS: Optical motion capture and force data were recorded while eight male participants ran at their
self-determined, normal running speed using their prescribed RSP (NORM; all; Blade XT, Blatchford,
Basingstoke, UK) and also immediately after it was replaced with both stiffer (STIFF) and more compliant
(COMP) RSPs (+/- one spring category, respectively). A 17 segment model (head, torso, pelvis, thighs,
shanks & intact foot, with the RSP modelled as nine linked rigid segments) was constructed within
Visual3D (C-Motion, MD, USA). Running speed, peak residual knee flexion and peak residual knee
extension moment were compared between conditions.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in running speed (NORM 3.49 (0.35) m/s; STIFF 3.53
(0.33) m/s; COMP 3.56 (036) m/s, p = 0.41), residual knee flexion (NORM 33 (2)°; STIFF 33 (9)°; COMP
31 (8)°, p = 0.86) or residual knee extension moment (NORM 1.50 (0.84) N.m/kg; STIFF 1.55 (0.87)
N.m/kg; COMP 1.62 (0.90) N.m/kg, p = 0.45).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with UTA, who run using an RSP, are able to adapt immediately to an
alteration in the RSP stiffness in order to minimise moments at the residual knee, and thus potentially
minimise torques at the residuum/socket interface. This is achieved without a reduction in running speed
or change in residual knee flexion.

Files (392.7 kB)
Name Size
RM2018_A11_De Asha.pdf
md5:a5e73ce30687a7fe02b04503f63797f4
392.7 kB Download
15
16
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 1515
Downloads 1616
Data volume 6.3 MB6.3 MB
Unique views 99
Unique downloads 99

Share

Cite as