Published December 22, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Rousseau's Dilemmas. A critical reading of The Social Contract [Os Dilemas de Rousseau. Uma leitura crítica d'O contrato social]

  • 1. Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

Description

The Second Discourse ends in a tone of negative critique, without offering a set of proposals that could contribute to transform the actual society in an ideal, although realistic, one. On the other hand, The Social Contract offers the grounds for this project; a project, which is not only political but mainly a project of transformation of human nature through politics, institutions and education. The concept of popular sovereignty plays a key role in this task: it transforms «the people» into the sovereign historical subject; and it does so by unfolding in the concept of General will. Through this, Rousseau is temporarily capable of conciliating the project of recovery of human freedom with the project of a well-ordered society where the common good becomes the regulative ideal. However, Rousseau lives in a permanent dilemma: the abyss between what i tis and what it should be. The politics of immanence converts itself in a politics of dualism, incarnated in the figure of the Legislator.

Files

2017 Costa Rousseau.pdf

Files (535.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:65aa9faf20fcba68ce35155b43efc3df
535.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
2254-0601 (ISSN)

References

  • Durkheim, Émile (1965). Montesquieu and Rousseau. Forerunners of Sociology. Toronto–Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.9689969
  • Hobbes, Thomas (1979). Leviathan. Tradução de João Paulo Monteiro. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
  • Locke, John (2001). Segundo Tratado sobre o Governo Civil e outros escritos: ensaio sobre a origem, os limites e os fins verdadeiros do governo civil. Tradução de Magda Lopes e Marisa Lobo da Costa. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
  • Maistre, Joseph Marie (1996). Against Rousseau. Montreal–London: McGill–Queen's University Press.
  • Man, Paul De (1979). Allegories of Reading. Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke and Proust. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
  • Marks, Jonathan (2005). Perfection and Disharmony in the Thought of Jean–Jacques Rousseau. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511498251
  • Meyers, Paul A. (2013). Abandoned to Ourselves. New Haven–London: Yale University Press. doi: 10.12987/yale/9780300172058.001.0001
  • Rousseau, Jean–Jacques (2008). Discurso sobre a Origem e Fundamentos da Desigualdade entre os homens. Tradução de Paulo Neves. Porto Alegre: L&PM Pocket.
  • Rousseau, Jean–Jacques (1999). O contrato Social. Tradução de António de Pádua Danesi. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
  • Riley, Paul (2001). «Rousseau's General Will». The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau Cambridge, edited by Patrick T. Riley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Starobinski, Jean (2011). Jean–Jacques Rousseau: a transparência e o obstáculo. Tradução de Maria Lúcia Machado. São Paulo: Companhia de Bolso.
  • Viroli, Maurizio (2003). Jean–Jacques Rousseau and the «Well–Ordered Society». Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .