Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published October 14, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

FOOD AND FEEDING HABITS OF CHAETOGNATHS FROM PARANGIPETTAI COASTAL WATER, SOUTHEAST COAST OF INDIA

Creators

  • 1. PG & Research Department of Zoology, T. K. Govt. Arts College, Vriddhachalam - 606 001, Tamil Nadu, India

Description

An investigation was carried out to know the food and feeding habits of Chaetognaths from Parangipettai coastal waters. The samples were collected and preserved immediately in 4% borax –buffered formalin – seawater (vol. /vol.). Totally, 12 Chaetognatha species were identified in this study. Among them, genera Pterosagitta, Krohnitta and Sagitta were dominant. Totally, 5719 chaetognaths individuals were analyzed to know the gut contents. Only 281 (4.9%) individuals have been found with food content and the remaining 5438 (95.1%) individuals had only empty guts. The food containing ratio (FCR), Number of Prey items Consumed (NPC) and Cannibalism were also analyzed. The maximum prey item was examined in Sagitta enflata and the minimum in S. neglecta and Krohnitta pacifica. Totally 705 numbers of preys were recorded during the study of which, the maximum (147 numbers) preys were observed during summer season and the minimum (23 numbers) in monsoon season. The maximum preys were copepods and the minimum prey was Lucifer sp. From the overall observation, the prey animal Paracalanus parvus was the most important prey for all the chaetognath species except the Sagitta regularis. The most frequently identified prey items were the copepods viz. Oncaea sp. and Microsetella sp. which could be easily identified as they undergo low degree of digestion in the facilitating measurement and classification. Other species such as Paracalanus parvus, Centropages brachiatus, Acartia tonsa, Oithona sp. and Corycaeus sp. were present in most cases. These could be identified easily by the mandible blade which was quite evident even during the advanced stage of digestion. The mean prey size was dependent on the total length of chaetognaths species.

Files

published-pdf-355-6-4. IJZAB ID No. 355.pdf

Files (774.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:50b6b864088a900e9b714720bb12b4fc
774.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Alvarez-Cadena, J.N. (1993). Feeding of the chaetognath Sagitta elegans Verrill. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 36(2), 195-206.
  • Alvarino, A. (1967). The Chaetognatha of the NAGA Expedition (1959-1961) in the South China Sea and the Gulf of Thailand. P. 1: Systematics Naga Report. 4, 197.
  • Alvarino, A. (1985). Predation in the plankton realm, mainly with reference to fish larvae. Inv. mar. CICIMAR, 2, 1-122.
  • Baier, C.T. & Purcell, J.E. (1997). Effects of sampling and preservation on apparent feeding by chaetognaths. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 37-42.
  • Boltovskoy, D. (1981). Estimación de la cantidad de agua filtrada. Atlas del Zooplancton del Atlántico Sudoccidental y métodos de trabajo con el zooplancton marino, Publicación Especial del Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero, Mar del Plata, 87-94.
  • Feigenbaum, D. (1979). Daily ration and specific daily ration of the chaetognath Sagitta enflata. Marine Biology, 54(1), 75-82.
  • Feigenbaum, D. (1991). Food and feeding behavior. The biology of chaetognaths. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 45-54
  • Feigenbaum, D. & Reeve, M. (1977). Prey detection in the Chaetognatha: response to a vibrating probe and experimental determination of attack distance in large aquaria. Limnology and Oceanography, 22(6), 1052-1058.
  • Froneman, P. & Pakhomov, E. (1998). Trophic importance of the chaetognaths Eukrohnia hamata and Sagitta gazellae in the pelagic system of the Prince Edward Islands (Southern Ocean). Polar Biology, 19(4), 242-249.
  • Gibbons, M.J. & Stuart, V. (1994). Feeding and vertical migration of the chaetognath Sagitta friderici (Ritter-Zahony, 1911) in the southern Benguela during spring 1987, with notes on seasonal variability of feeding ecology. South African Journal of Marine Science, 14(1), 361-372.
  • Goswami, S. (2004). Zooplankton methodology, collection & identyification-A field manual: National Institute of Oceanography, Goa Invertebate 7, (3) 742-736.
  • Johnson, T.B. & Terazaki, M. (2004). Chaetognath ecology in relation to hydrographic conditions in the Australian sector of the Antarctic Ocean. Polar Bioscience, 17, 1-15
  • Kasturirangan, L. (1963). A Key for the Identification of the More Common Planktonic Copepoda: Of Indian Coastal Waters: Council of Scientific & Industrial Research.
  • Lancraft, T.M., Hopkins, T.L., Torres, J.J. & Donnelly, J. (1991). Oceanimicronektonic/ macrozooplanktoni community structure and feeding in ice covered Antarctic waters during the winter (AMERIEZ 1988). Polar Biology, 11(3), 157-167.
  • Lukac, D. (2005). Community structure and predation impact of carnivorous macrozooplankton in the Polar Frontal Zone (Southern Ocean) with particular reference to chaetognaths. M.Sc., Thesis. Rhodes University, Grahams Town.
  • Michel, H.B. (1984). Chaetognatha of the Caribbean Sea and adjacent areas. NOAA. 1-33.
  • Oresland, V. (1990). Feeding and predation impact of the chaetognath Eukrohnia hamata in Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 63, 201-209.
  • Oresland, V. (1995). Winter population structure and feeding of the chaetognath Eukrohnia hamata and the copepod Euchaeta antarctica in Gerlache Strait, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 119, 77-86.
  • Pakhomov, E., Perissinotto, R., McQuaid, C. & Froneman, P. (2000). Zooplankton structure and grazing in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean in late austral summer 1993: Part 1. Ecological zonation. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 47(9), 1663-1686.
  • Pearre Jr, S. (1974). Ecological studies of three West-Mediterranean Chaetognaths. Investigación pesquera. Investigatión Pesquera, 38, 325-369.
  • Pearre Jr, S. (1976). A seasonal study of the diets of three sympatric chaetognaths. Investigacion pesq., Santiago, 40, 1-16.
  • Pearre Jr, S. (1980). Feeding by Chaetognatha: the relation of prey size to predator size in several species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 125-134.
  • Pearre, S. (1973). Vertical migration and feeding in Sagitta elegans Verrill. Ecology, 54(2), 300-314.
  • Perumal, P., Sampathkumar, P. & Santhanam, P. (1998). Monograph on zooplankton of Parangipettai coastal waters. Annamalai University, UGC-SAP, 1, 31.
  • Reeve, M.R. (1970). The biology of Chaetognatha I. Quantitative aspects of growth and egg production in Sagitta hispida. Marine food chains(S), 168.
  • Stuart, V. & Verheye, H.M. (1991). Diel migration and feeding patterns of the chaetognath, Sagitta friderici, off the west coast of South Africa. Journal of Marine Research, 49(3), 493-515.
  • Sullivan, B.K. (1980). In situ feeding behavior of Sagitta elegans and Eukrohnia hamata (Chaetognatha) in relation to the vertical distribution and abundance of prey at Ocean Station "P". Limnology and Oceanography, 25(2), 317-326.
  • Szyper, J.P. (1978). Feeding rate of the chaetognath Sagitta enflata in nature. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 7(6), 567-575.
  • Terazaki, M. (1998). Life history, distribution, seasonal variability and feeding of the pelagic chaetognath Sagitta elegans in the Subarctic Pacific: a review. Plankton Biology ad Ecology, 45(1), 1-17.
  • Vega Perez, L.A. & Liang, T.H. (1992). Feeding of a pelagic chaetognath, Sagitta friderici Ritter-Záhony off Ubatuba region (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico, 40(1-2), 93-100.

Subjects

Zoology
10.5281/zenodo.1461691