Published September 13, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Why retaining fundamental research funding for the social sciences and humanities is critical to producing societally relevant research

Creators

  • 1. Dr

Description

This is a short analysis published on Elephant in the lab – a blog journal on science policy. It is part of a series of articles analysing Ethics in Science.

Files

EitL_Why retaining fundamental research funding for the social sciences and humanities is critical to producing societally relevant research.pdf

Files (165.5 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Bozeman, B. (2002). Public‐Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do. Public Administration Review 62.
  • Giles, J. (2004). Sandpit initiative digs deep to bring disciplines together. Nature 427.
  • Gronde, T.v.d., Uyl-de Groot, C.A., Pieters, T. (2017). Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: A systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks. PLOS ONE 12(8).
  • Holm, P., Goodsite, M.G., Cloetingh, S., Agnoletti, M., Moldan, B., Lang, D.J., Leemans, R., Moeller, J.O., Buendía, M.P., Pohl, W., Scholz, R.W., Sors, A., Vanheusden, B., Yusoff, K., Zondervan, R. (2013). Collaboration between the natural, social and human sciences in Global Change Research. Environmental Science & Policy 28.
  • Maxwell, K., Benneworth, P. (2018). The construction of new scientific norms for solving Grand Challenges. Palgrave Communications 4(52).
  • Petersen, D.B. (2016). Integrating social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary research. Palgrave Communications 2.
  • Røyne A., Phua, Y. J., Borch, A., Throne-Holst, H., Josefsen, K. D., Balzer Le, S., Wentzel, A., Myhr, A., Røyne, F., Sikorski, P. (2017). Kunsten å arbeide tverrfaglig. Forskerforum 12th May.
  • Science Europe Scientific Committee for the Humanities (2014). Humanities Scientific Committee Opinion Paper.