Perceiving Hate Crimes: A Comparative Analysis of Major Newspaper Coverage of Hate Crimes in the United States and the United Kingdom
Description
This study examines a year of major coverage of hate crimes across select United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) newspapers. Historically, scholars have gained valuable insights into American perceptions pertaining to crime through a critical examination of American newspapers’ reportage of crime. The central argument of this research is that the amount of press coverage of hate crimes isa determining factor in the formation of public perceptions, values, attitudes, and behaviors regarding hate crimes in the short run as well as in the long run. Previous studies reveal the existence of a unidirectional relationship between both news content and public opinion regarding social issues. The findings of this study suggest that the print media in the UK reports more stories of hate crimes than the print media in the US. The author concluded that the UK’s more stringent laws regarding hate crimes might have contributed to the greater amount of print media coverage of hate crimes in the country.
Files
GordonVol13Issue1IJCJS.pdf
Files
(335.3 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:9778b7eba6d47678d1f07c0e8a7d1ca0
|
335.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is identical to
- http://ijcjs.com/pdfs/GordonVol13Issue1IJCJS.pdf (URL)
References
- Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2016). Effects of editorial media bias perception and media trust on the use of traditional, citizen, and social media news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 106-118. Archold, C. A., Dahle, T. O., Fangman, M., Wentz, E., & Wood, M. (2013). Newspaper accounts of racial profiling: Accurate portrayal or perpetuation of myth? Race and Justice, 3(4), 300–320. Berg, B. L., Lune, H., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson. Boréus, K., & Bergström, G. (2017). Analyzing text and discourse: Eight approaches for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Carlson, J. (2016). Moral panic, moral breach: Bernhard Goetz, George Zimmerman, and racialized news reporting in contested cases of self-defense. Social Problems, 63(1), 1-20. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London: Psychology Press. Colomb, W., & Damphousse, K. (2004). Examination of newspaper coverage of hate crimes: A moral panic perspective. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(2), 147–163. Corbett, S. (2016). The social consequences of Brexit for the UK and Europe: Euroscepticism, populism, nationalism, and societal division. The International Journal of Social Quality, 6(1), 11–31. Garland, D. (2008). On the concept of moral panic. Crime, Media, Culture, 4(1), 9–30. Goode, E., & BenYehuda, N. (1982). Social movements.Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance, Second Edition, 141-149. Greer, C. (2013). Sex crime and the media: Press representations in Northern Ireland in Mason, Criminal Visions, 90–115. Human Right First (n.d). Human Rights Firsts. Retrieved from http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/ Husselbee, L. P., & Elliott, L. (2002). Looking beyond hate: How national and regional newspapers framed hate crimes in Jasper, Texas, and Laramie, Wyoming. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 833–852. Jacobs, J. B., & Henry, J. S. (1996). The social construction of a hate crime epidemic. Journal of Criminal Law& Criminology, 86, 366. Jamel, J. (2014). Do the print media provide a gender-biased representation of male rape? Internet Journal of Criminology, 2, 1–13. Kimmel, C. M., Warren, K. T., Dombrowski, E., Greer-Williams, N., & Orbe, M. P. (2001). Setting the local civil rights "Cultural Agenda": An analysis of three Michigan newspapers. Journal of Intergroup Relations, 28(1), 4–15. Lombard, M., Snyder, Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. Longazel, J. G. (2013). Moral panic as racial degradation ceremony: Racial stratification and the local-level backlash against Latino/a immigrants. Punishment & Society, 15(1), 96–119. McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. Meer, N. (2008). The politics of voluntary and involuntary identities: Are Muslims in Britain an ethnic, racial or religious minority? Patterns of Prejudice, 42(1), 61–81. Perse, E. M., & Lambe, J. (2016). Media effects and Society. London: Routledge. Rosa, J., & Bonilla, Y. (2017). Deprovincializing Trump, decolonizing diversity, and unsettling anthropology. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 201-208. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. Schildkraut, J., Elsass, H. J., & Stafford, M. C. (2015). Could it happen here? Moral panic, school shootings, and fear of crime among college students. Crime, Law and Social Change, 63(1–2), 91–110. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). "To Thine Own Self Be True" Values, Framing, and Voter Decision-Making Strategies. Communication Research, 23(5), 509-560. Shaw, E. F. (1979). Agenda-setting and mass communication theory. International Communication Gazette, 25(2), 96–105. Sutherland, G. A., McCormack, A., Easteal, P. L., Holland, K., & Pirkis, J. (2016). Media guidelines for the responsible reporting of violence against women: A review of evidence and issues. Australian Journalism Review, 38, 8–17. Welch, M., Fenwick, M., & Roberts, M. (1997). Primary definitions of crime and moral panic: A content analysis of experts' quotes in feature newspaper articles on crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(4), 474–494. Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication, 30(2), 175–192.