Published May 2, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

NUTRITIONAL INDICES AS AN INDEX TO ASSESS THE FEEDING POTENTIALS OF FOREST INSECT PESTS, DEREODUS DENTICOLLIS AND MYLLOCERUS VIRIDANUS

  • 1. PG & Research Department of Zoology, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Cheyyar, Tamilnadu

Description

Feeding preference of forest insect pests such as Myllocerus viridanus and Dereodus denticollis was studied using teak and acacia leaves in laboratory condition by analyzing the nutritional indices such as consumption index (CI), approximate digestibility (AD), efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI). The insect pests were collected from the plantations and maintained in the laboratory. Three types of experiments were conducted to understand the feeding potentials of the insects. In the first experiment, Dereodus sp. was fed with teak leaf for 24 and 48 hrs. In this experiment ECD and ECI were higher than the AD and CI.   In the second experiment, Myllocerus sp. was fed with the teak leaf where the ECD and ECI were very less when compared with the results of the first experiment. The third experiment showed the efficiency of the feeding nature of the Myllocerus with Acaica leaf where the food ingestion and food digestion were higher than the other two experiments whereas the AD and ECI were low when compared with the first two experiments. Food preference was assessed based on the results. Probably the Myllocerus prefers mostly the acacia leaf than the teak leaf.  The feeding potential indirectly reveals the nature of damage to the host plants. The results revealed to devise the strategy to control the plantations to avoid further damage in the form of growth and yield.

Files

353.pdf

Files (546.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a5009d6e060378eb668d34727adc51e4
546.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Broadway R M & Duffey S S, J.Insect .Physiol., 32 (1986) 827. 2. Dethier V G, Chemical ecology (Academic Press, , New York) 1972 3. Harborne J B, Introduction to ecological biochemistry (.Academic Press, London) 1982 4. Mattson W J & Scriber J M, Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and related invertebrates (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) 1987 5. Pallavi, V. Khairmode and T.V. Sathe, 2014. Seasonal abundance of weevils Myllocerus spp. on mulberry in Kolhapur region, International Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No 1, 203 – 207 6. Reddy, M. V. and J. R. B. Alfred, 1979. Utilization of castor (Ricinus communis Linn.) leaves by last instar larvae of the silk moth Philosami aricini Hutt. (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Ind. Biologist.11: 36-40 7. Scriber, J. M. and Slansky, F. Jr. E.C.1981. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Ann. Rev. of Entomol., 26: 183-211. 8. Slansky, E. C. F. Jr. and J.M. Scriber. 1985. Food consumption and utilization. In: Kerkut, G. A. and Gillbert, II (Eds.). Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Pergamon, Oxford. 87-163. 9. Singh, J.S., Singhal, R.N. and L.K. Vats. 1975. Food consumption, partitioning and ecological efficiencies in adult Poecilocerus pictus Dabr. (Orthoptera:Acrididae). Tropical Ecology.16: 171-181 10. Waldbauer G P, Adv. Insect Physiol., 5 (1968) 229.