Merge: the fragmentation of second language acquisition theory, and our blended experience of reality

Michael Long (2007) seeks to make clear certain severe problems afflicting Second Language Acquisition (SLA) studies, railing against the so-called proliferation of theory in the field. He perceives this threat as coming from the sociocultural wing of SLA. However, his hypothesis that researchers on language learning studies should protect vulnerable theories from criticism, is totally unconvincing. In fact, Long unwittingly provides very strong evidence that SLA must undergo a more rigorous review. It goes without saying that research cannot achieve true progress if its theoretical focus is too narrow. Even evidence from theoretical linguistics makes it clear that language learning studies require a broader frame of reference. Studies of language learning need to focus on the reality that humans experience physically and unconsciously in their daily world. In particular, abstract research methods confront us with the risk of losing contact with the concrete world that is rooted in culture and physical experience.