Journal article Open Access
Currently a vast number of scientific publications in Russia and abroad are devoted to the phenomenon of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Success factors of the Agency are usually identified as: a recruitment policy of research managers, scientific resources of the Agency’s contractors, unique super-system of the DARPA's external environment and significant costs of R&D initiatives spent by the US Department of Defense. At the same time, systems engineering and technical assistance (SETA) contracting in the implementation of DARPA's high-risk projects have been neglected as a rule by the time. This paper describes the role of SETA-support contractors in ensuring the success of DARPA's ambitious projects and the impact of government contracts technical support on perspective defense R&D programs. The SETA rate in total R&D expenditures of DARPA are evaluated as 7,4-9,9%. Finally, the possibility of implementation of best practices and experiences of SETA system utilization for technological support of perspective high-risk R&D programs for governmental Russian agencies is analyzed.
Note: Downloadable document is available in Russian.
SSRN-id2933553_Management of Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance of DARPA Research Programs.pdf
Bonvillian W.B. The new model innovation agencies: An overview. Science and Public Policy, 2014, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 425-437. DOI:10.1093/scipol/sct059.
Bonvillian W.B., van Atta R. ARPA-E and DARPA: Applying the DARPA model to energy innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 469–513. DOI:10.1007/s10961-011-9223-x.
Butler Jr D.H. SETA Support for the DARPA Microelectronics Technology Insertion Program of the Microelectronics Technology Office. – Booz-Allen and Hamilton Inc. Arlington VA, 1992.
Butler Jr D.H. Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance in Support of Digital Gallium Arsenide Insertion Projects. – Booz-Allen and Hamilton Inc., Arlington VA, 1992.
Carleton T. Changing Culture Through Visionary Thinking: Applying the DARPA Hard Test for Innovation. Research Technology Management, 2015, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 12-15. DOI:10.5437/08956308X5803008.
Colatat P. An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPA. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 874–887. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.005.
Dugan R.E., Gabriel K.J. "Special Forces" Innovation: How DARPA attacks problems. Harvard Business Review, 2013, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 74-84.
Durmaz M. Defense technology development: does every country need an organization like DARPA?. Innovation, 2016, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2–12. DOI:10.1080/14479338.2016.1163235.
Fedorovich V.A., Patron A.P. SShA: gosudarstvo i ekonomika [USA: the State and Economics], Moscow, ISKRAN, 2005, 390 p. (in Russian).
Fedorovich V.A., Patron A.P., Zavarukhin V.P. SShA: Federal'naja kontraktnaja sistema. Mehanizm regulirovanija gosudarstvennogo hozjajstvovanija [US: Federal contract system. Mechanism of regulation of public management]. Moscow, Nauka, 2010, 1055 p. (in Russian).
Fredericks S. Performance-based statement of work for professional support services for the Office of the Director (DIRO) Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA). – Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. McLean, VA, 2014. 39 p.
Fuchs E.R.H. Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Research Policy, 2010, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1133–1147. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.003.
Gansler J.S., Lucyshyn W., Rigilano J. Effective Acquisition Strategies for Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA). – Maryland University College Park Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise, 2012.
Johnson T.R., Feng P., Sitzabee W., Jernigan M. Federal Acquisition Regulation Applied to Alliancing Contract Practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 480–487. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000592.
Klabukov I.D., Alekhin M.D., Musienko S.V. Sum of Technologies of National Defense and Technological Superiority. Moscow, Research community, 2014, 33 p. (in Russian). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.33861.04326.
Klabukov I.D., Alekhin M.D., Musienko S.V. Venture Funds and Other Advanced Technologies for National Intelligence Services. Moscow, MFTI, 2012, 118 p. (in Russian). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.28827.87842.
Klabukov I.D., Alekhin M.D., Nekhina A.A. Review of DARPA FY 2015 Research Programs. Innovation practice eJOURNAL, 2014, vol. 2, no. 11 (in Russian). DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2439081.
Mathijsen D. DARPA: Inventing the future of military technology. Reinforced Plastics, 2015, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 233–237. DOI:10.1016/j.repl.2015.08.048.
Oppenheim B.W., Murman E.M., Secor D.A. Lean enablers for systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 2011, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29-55. DOI:10.1002/sys.20161.
Reardon S. The military-bioscience complex. Nature, 2015, vol. 522, no. 7555, pp. 142–144. DOI:10.1038/522142a.
Rosati R. Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance. System Planning Corp. Arlington VA, 1988. № SPC-88-2949.
Yakushev S. Organization of military research in the US Department of Defense. Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie [Foreign Military Review], 1989, no. 9, pp. 3-7 (in Russian).