Journal article Open Access
Currently a vast number of scientific publications in Russia and abroad are devoted to the phenomenon of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Success factors of the Agency are usually identified as: a recruitment policy of research managers, scientific resources of the Agency’s contractors, unique super-system of the DARPA's external environment and significant costs of R&D initiatives spent by the US Department of Defense. At the same time, systems engineering and technical assistance (SETA) contracting in the implementation of DARPA's high-risk projects have been neglected as a rule by the time. This paper describes the role of SETA-support contractors in ensuring the success of DARPA's ambitious projects and the impact of government contracts technical support on perspective defense R&D programs. The SETA rate in total R&D expenditures of DARPA are evaluated as 7,4-9,9%. Finally, the possibility of implementation of best practices and experiences of SETA system utilization for technological support of perspective high-risk R&D programs for governmental Russian agencies is analyzed.
Note: Downloadable document is available in Russian.
SSRN-id2933553_Management of Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance of DARPA Research Programs.pdf
Fedorovich V.A., Patron A.P. SShA: gosudarstvo i ekonomika [USA: the State and Economics], Moscow, ISKRAN, 2005, 390 p. (in Russian).
Yakushev S. Organization of military research in the US Department of Defense. Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie [Foreign Military Review], 1989, no. 9, pp. 3-7 (in Russian).
Dugan R.E., Gabriel K.J. "Special Forces" Innovation: How DARPA attacks problems. Harvard Business Review, 2013, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 74-84.
Carleton T. Changing Culture Through Visionary Thinking: Applying the DARPA Hard Test for Innovation. Research Technology Management, 2015, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 12-15. DOI:10.5437/08956308X5803008.
Fuchs E.R.H. Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Research Policy, 2010, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1133–1147. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.003.
Colatat P. An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPA. Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 874–887. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.005.
Fedorovich V.A., Patron A.P., Zavarukhin V.P. SShA: Federal'naja kontraktnaja sistema. Mehanizm regulirovanija gosudarstvennogo hozjajstvovanija [US: Federal contract system. Mechanism of regulation of public management]. Moscow, Nauka, 2010, 1055 p. (in Russian).
Klabukov I.D., Alekhin M.D., Nekhina A.A. Review of DARPA FY 2015 Research Programs. Innovation practice eJOURNAL, 2014, vol. 2, no. 11 (in Russian). DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2439081.
Oppenheim B.W., Murman E.M., Secor D.A. Lean enablers for systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 2011, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29-55. DOI:10.1002/sys.20161.
Gansler J.S., Lucyshyn W., Rigilano J. Effective Acquisition Strategies for Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA). – Maryland University College Park Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise, 2012.
Butler Jr D.H. SETA Support for the DARPA Microelectronics Technology Insertion Program of the Microelectronics Technology Office. – Booz-Allen and Hamilton Inc. Arlington VA, 1992.
Butler Jr D.H. Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance in Support of Digital Gallium Arsenide Insertion Projects. – Booz-Allen and Hamilton Inc., Arlington VA, 1992.
Rosati R. Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance. System Planning Corp. Arlington VA, 1988. № SPC-88-2949.
Klabukov I.D., Alekhin M.D., Musienko S.V. Sum of Technologies of National Defense and Technological Superiority. Moscow, Research community, 2014, 33 p. (in Russian). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.33861.04326.
Klabukov I.D., Alekhin M.D., Musienko S.V. Venture Funds and Other Advanced Technologies for National Intelligence Services. Moscow, MFTI, 2012, 118 p. (in Russian). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.28827.87842.
Mathijsen D. DARPA: Inventing the future of military technology. Reinforced Plastics, 2015, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 233–237. DOI:10.1016/j.repl.2015.08.048.
Johnson T.R., Feng P., Sitzabee W., Jernigan M. Federal Acquisition Regulation Applied to Alliancing Contract Practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 480–487. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000592.
Fredericks S. Performance-based statement of work for professional support services for the Office of the Director (DIRO) Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA). – Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. McLean, VA, 2014. 39 p.
Bonvillian W.B. The new model innovation agencies: An overview. Science and Public Policy, 2014, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 425-437. DOI:10.1093/scipol/sct059.
Bonvillian W.B., van Atta R. ARPA-E and DARPA: Applying the DARPA model to energy innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 469–513. DOI:10.1007/s10961-011-9223-x.
Reardon S. The military-bioscience complex. Nature, 2015, vol. 522, no. 7555, pp. 142–144. DOI:10.1038/522142a.
Durmaz M. Defense technology development: does every country need an organization like DARPA?. Innovation, 2016, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2–12. DOI:10.1080/14479338.2016.1163235.