There is a newer version of the record available.

Published January 31, 2018 | Version v5.0
Preprint Open

Comparison of Oxford Nanopore basecalling tools

  • 1. Dept Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne

Description

This repository uses a bacterial genome to assess the read accuracy and consensus sequence accuracy for Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) basecallers. Albacore v2.1.10, Guppy v0.3.0 and Scrappie raw v1.3.0 (all developed by ONT) were the best performers for read accuracy, and Chiron v0.3 produced the best assemblies. Consensus sequence accuracies reached approximately 99.75%, revealing that even the best basecallers still have systematic error. Nanopolish, used with its methylation-aware option, was able to raise consensus accuracy to about 99.9%. Most post-Nanopolish assemblies have similar accuracy, making basecaller choice relatively unimportant if Nanopolish is used.

Files

rrwick/Basecalling-comparison-v5.0.zip

Files (75.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3670454cfc9edf4ac99b281d55e17bbd
75.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details