World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
Published November 3, 2013 | Version 9996811
Journal article Open

Academic Performance of Engineering Students: The Role of Abilities & Learning Style

Creators

Description

Abilities are important for academic success. Yet, abilities cannot be the whole story. Styles might be one source of unexplained variation. A style is a preferred way of using ones abilities. Students are thought to be incompetent not because they are lacking in abilities, but because their styles do not match the academic course chosen. The purpose of the study was to determine the role of abilities and learning styles in prediction of academic performance and their adjustment. Participants were 272 engineering students. The tools used are Myers Briggs Type Indicator, Culture Fair Intelligence Test and Student Problem Checklist. The statistical procedures employed were t-test, correlations and stepwise regressions. The analyses of the data indicated that although abilities are better predictors of academic performance, learning styles also shown a significant relationship. The study also indicates that if students learning styles matches to their chosen academic course, they tend to show better performance and less adjustment problems.

Files

9996811.pdf

Files (4.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7f992ac060dcf99582d67ae1b0692cba
4.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • N. V. P. Saraswathi, "Instructional Environments and Personality: Implications for Academic Achievement (Unpublished dissertation)," Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India, 1991.
  • R.J. Sternberg, Intelligence, information-processing and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.
  • J.W. Keefe, Learning Style: An overview. In NASSP's student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, 1979 (pp.1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School.
  • D.A. Kolb, Learning styles and discipclinary differences. In A.W. Chickering and Associates (Eds). The Modern American College, San Francisco: Jossey Ban, 1981.
  • J.W. Keefe, & B. Ferrel, Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. Educational Leadership, 10, 1990, pp. 57-61.
  • R. Dunn, Learning style and its relation to exceptionally at both ends of the spectrum. Exceptional Children, 4(6),1983,pp.496-506.
  • P.A. Mc Dermott, Comparative functions of preschool learning style and IQ in predicting future academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9(1), 1984, pp.38 – 47.
  • D.H. Stott, Learning styles or intelligence. School Psychology International, 6 (3), 1985, 167-174.
  • C.D. Miller, M. Always, & D.L. McKinley, Effects of learning styles and strategies on academic success. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28 (5), 1987, 399-404. [10] L.I. Leiden, R. D, Crosby, & H. Follmer, Assessing learning-style inventories and how well they predict academic performance. Journal of Academic Medicine, 65(6), 1990, 395-401. [11] G.D. Nunn, Effects of a learning styles strategy and strategies Intervention upon at-risk middle school students achievement and locus of control. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22 1995, 34-39. [12] L.D. Gonzalez., F.S. Castaneda, N. Maytorena,& Angeles, Maria de los Learning styles and achievement in first-year university students, 2000. [13] R. J. Sternberg, Beyond IQ: A Triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Revista de Psicologia, 18(2), 1985, 199-225. [14] D. Sinha, Sociological and psychological factors in the success of engineering students. Journal of Psychological Researches, 1960. [15] P. L. Ackerman, &E.D. Heggestad, Intelligence, personality and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, pp.219–245, 1997. [16] U. Neisser, G. Boodoo, T.J. Bouchard, A.W. Boykin, N. Brody, S.J.Cesi, et al., Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, pp.77–101, 1996. [17] A.R. Jensen, Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press, 1980. [18] G. C. Stern, M. I. Stein, & B.S. Bloom, Methods in personality Assessment, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1956. [19] D.C. McClelland, (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence." American Psychologist, 1973,pp. 28, 1-14. [20] L.J. Cronbach, Educational Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co., 260, 1954. [21] D.E.Super, Appraising Vocational Fitness. New York: Harper, 1949. [22] R.J. Sternberg, R.K. Wagner, W.M. Williams, & J. Horvath,J, Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50, 1995, pp. 912-927. [23] S.J. Ceci, On intelligence more or less. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990. [24] A.K. Srivastava, A study of intercorrelation between some variables found to be significantly related to under achievement. Indian Journal of Behaviour, 1(3), 1977, pp.26-28. [25] P. Pati,&A.S.Dash, Effects of grade, sex and achievement levels on intelligence, incidental memory and Stroop scores. Effects of grade, sex and achievement levels on intelligence, incidental memory and Stroop scores. Psychological Studies, 35(1), 1990, pp.36-40. [26] R. Singh, & S. K. Varma, The effects of an academic aspiration and intelligence on Scholastic success of XI graders. Indian Journal of Psychometry& Education, 26 (1), 1995,pp. 43 – 48. [27] B. C. Muthayya, Level of aspiration and intelligence of high achievers and low achievers in the scholastic field. Journal of Psychological Researches, 6(3), 1962. [28] E. E. Cureton, L.W. Cureton, &R. Bishop, Prediction of success in graduate study in psychology at the University of Texas. American Psychologist, 4, 1949, pp. 361-362. [29] R.N. Broadus, & K.E. Elmore, The comparative validities of undergraduate grade point average and of part scores on the Graduate Record Examinations in the prediction of two criterion measures in a graduate libra school program. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 1983, pp. 543-546. [30] M.L. Sleeper, Relationship of scores on the Graduate Record Examination to Grade Point Averages of graduate students in occupational therapy. Educationa and Psychological Measurement, 21, 1961, pp.1039-1040. [31] A.R. Marston, (1971). It is time to reconsider the Graduate Record Examination, American Psychologist, 26, 1971, pp. 653-655. [32] R.J. Sternberg, & W.M. Williams, Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? American Psychologist, 52, 1997, pp. 630-641. [33] E.M. Bower, &J. Holmes, Emotional factors and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 29, 1958, pp.529 - 544. [34] V.M. Hourston,& S.S. Morzalf, Adjustment and academic predictability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1,1954, pp. 96-99. [35] W.A.L. Congdon, The perplexities of College freshman, Educational & Psychological Measurement, 3, 1943, pp. 367-375. [36] H.K. Misra, Personality patterns of the high and low achievers in engineering education. Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 1962. [37] I.Myers, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting, 1978. [38] R.J. Sternberg, R. JThinking Styles. Cambridge University Press 1997. [39] D.A. Kolb, Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A.W. Chickering and Associates (Eds). The Modern American College, San Francisco: Jossey Ban, 1981. [40] M.J. Cook, "An exploratory study of learning styles as a predictor of college academic adjustment (Unpublished manuscript,1997), Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT. [41] R. Dangwal, & S. Mitra, Learning Styles Inventory- In the Asian Context. Journal of Psychological Researches, 42(3), 1998, pp. 138-145. [42] J.E. Stice, Using Kolb1s learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education, 77, 1987, pp. 291-296. [43] L.J. Cronbach, & R.E. Snow, Aptitudes and Instructional methods: A handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington, 1977.