Published October 26, 2008 | Version 12124
Journal article Open

Design of Domain-Specific Software Systems with Parametric Code Templates

Description

Domain-specific languages describe specific solutions to problems in the application domain. Traditionally they form a solution composing black-box abstractions together. This, usually, involves non-deep transformations over the target model. In this paper we argue that it is potentially powerful to operate with grey-box abstractions to build a domain-specific software system. We present parametric code templates as grey-box abstractions and conceptual tools to encapsulate and manipulate these templates. Manipulations introduce template-s merging routines and can be defined in a generic way. This involves reasoning mechanisms at the code templates level. We introduce the concept of Neurath Modelling Language (NML) that operates with parametric code templates and specifies a visualisation mapping mechanism for target models. Finally we provide an example of calculating a domain-specific software system with predefined NML elements.

Files

12124.pdf

Files (334.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0d5098b6dc6506071ac57c48deefe857
334.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • D. J.M. Taylor and L.J. Mazlack, Domain-Specific Ontology Merging for the Semantic Web, NAFIPS 2005 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 2005.
  • P. Pfahler and U. Kastens, Configuring Component-Based Specifications for Domain-Specific Languages, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001.
  • R. Esser and J. W. Janneck, "A framework for defining domain-specific visual languages," In Workshop on Domain Specific Visual Languages, in conjunction with ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications OOPSLA-2001, 2001.
  • Information Visualisation. Tutorial Notes, http://www.iicm.edu/-ivis/- ivis.pdf, 1998.
  • P. Irani, M. Tingley, and C. Ware, "Using Perceptual Syntax to Enhance Semantic Content in Diagrams," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. pp. 76-84, 2001.
  • P. Honeywill, "A comparison between maya hieroglyphs and computer icons," AI & Society archive, vol. Vol. 14, Issue 3-4, pp. pp.395-410, 2000, iSSN: 09515666.
  • O. Neurath, "Visual education: A new language," Survey Graphic, vol. Vol. 26, No. 1, 1937.
  • D.D. Souza and A. C. Wills, Objects, Components and Frameworks: The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
  • D. Alur, J.Crupi, and D.Malks, "Core J2EE Patterns, Best Practices and Design Illusions," Proceedings of the Twentieth Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, 1997. [10] K. Wolke, ASLT Framework, LaborPP, University of Applied Sciences, Emden (Germany) and STRL, De Montfort University Leicester (UK), http://www.karsten-wolke.de/public/aslt/ASLT 1.1.rar, 2006. [11] K. Wolke, Meta Information in ASLTs, LaborPP, University of Applied Sciences, Emden (Germany) and STRL, De Montfort University Leicester (UK), http://www.karsten-wolke.de/public/aslt- /ASLTMetaData.pdf, 2006. [12] M. Solanki, A Compositional Framework for the Specification, Verification and Runtime Validation of Reactive Web Services (PhD Thesis), Software Technology Research Laboratory, De Montfort University, 2005. [13] N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, 2001. [14] E. Gamma, R. Helm, and E. Johnson, Ralph, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.Professional Computing Series, 1994, iSBN: 0201633612.