Published October 8, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

STUDENTS' GENDER, LEARNING STYLE, AND DIFFICULTIES IN SOLVING PROBLEMS IN COLLEGE ALGEBRA

  • 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Management Studies, Cavite State University – Tanza Campus, Philippines

Description

The study was an attempt to determine the students’ level of difficulties encountered in solving problems in college algebra as profiled in their gender and learning style.  Difficulties in solving mathematical problems were measured in terms of conceptual and computational difficulties and were classified as to high, average, and low difficulty levels.  Two research instruments were prepared: the learning style inventory (LSI) and the diagnostic test (DT) in college algebra.  The LSI was adopted from Kolb’s Model of Experiential Learning; while the DT was developed and was validated so as to achieve reliability and validity.  A total of 84 students who were enrolled in College Algebra were considered in the study.  Results revealed that there is significant relationship that exists between gender and preferred learning style; between gender and level of conceptual difficulty; between learning style and level of conceptual difficulty; and between learning style and computational difficulty.  Furthermore, most of the female participants preferred the learning style of being converger; while the male students preferred being accommodator.  Male and female students have no significant difference in conceptual difficulties; but male students outperformed female students in computational understanding.   On the other hand, scores of assimilators in conceptual understanding is significantly higher than convergers; while convergers have higher computational understanding than assimilators.

Files

445.pdf

Files (402.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b8249a0378d9eb5410cf9f861419e14b
402.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Berch, D. B. & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company. 2. Carnine, M. (1997).Instructional design in mathematics for student with learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 30: 130 – 141. 3. Dacey, J. S. & Travers, J. F. (2006).Human development across the lifespan.6th edition. Boston: McGraw Hill. 4. Draper, S. R. P. (2004). The effects of gender grouping and learning style on student curiosity in modular technology education laboratories.Unpublished dissertation.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 5. Eksi, H. (2006, January). The relationship between learning styles and problem solving skills among college students. Educational Sciences, 6(1): 255 – 264. 6. Felder, R. (1995). Learning and teaching style preferences of community mental health professionals. Community Mental Health Journal, 11(4): 450 – 461. 7. Gallagher, A. M., DeLisi, R., Holst, P. C., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V., Morely, M. & Cahalan, C. (2000).Gender differences in adavanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75: 165 – 190. 8. Garderen, D. V. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imaginary and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 39(6): 496 – 506. 9. Garnett, K. G. (1998). Math Learning Disabilities.Journal of CEC.Retrieved on June 24, 2013 from http://www.idonline.org/ld_indepth /math_skill/garnet.html. 10. Geary, D. C. (2004).Mathematical and learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 37(1): 4 – 15. 11. Goldman, S. and Hasselbring, T. (1997).Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30 (2): 198 – 208. 12. Halpern, D. F. (2000).Sex differences in Cognitive abilities (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 13. Hill, B. (2008). Cognitive skills and mathematical skills.21st century skill. Retrieved June 24, 2013 from 14. http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/route21/index.php?option=com_ilibrary 15. Kaufman, L. (2008). Dyscalculia: Neuroscience and education. Journal of Education Research, 50(2): 163 – 175. 16. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 17. Kolb, D. A. (2000).Facilitator's guide to learning. Boston: Hay/McBer. 18. Loo, R. (2002).The distribution of learning styles and types for hard and soft business majors. Educational Psychology, 22(3): 349 – 360. 19. Meese, R. L. (2001). Teaching learners with mild disabilities integrating research practice. Singapore: Wadworth Thomson Learning. 20. Mitchelmore, M. & White, P. (1995). Abstraction in mathematics: Conflict resolution and application. Mathematics education research journal, 7(1): 50 – 68. 21. Nathan, V., Lauren, Sarah, L., Adam, & Nathan, S. (2002). Difficulties with math: what can stand in the way of a students' mathematical development. Misunderstood minds.Retrieved June 24, 2013 from http://www.misunderstoodmind/math_skill. 22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 23. Osmon, D. C., Smerz, J. M., Braun, M. M. & Plambeck, E. (2006). Processing abilities associated with math skills in adult learning disability. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 28: 84 – 95. 24. Pajares, F. (1996).Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21: 325 – 344. 25. Philbin, M., Meier, E., Huffman, S., & Boverie P. (1995).A survey of gender and learning styles. A Journal of Research, 32(7 – 8): 485 – 495. 26. Reys, R., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D., Smith, N., and Suydam, M. (2004). Helping children learn mathematics (6th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 27. Said, J. and Ghani, E. K. (2009). The effect of course selection and course experience on students' learning style preference. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1): 74 – 84. 28. Scott, W. (2004). Learning difficulties and learning disabilitis: Identifying an issue – the issue of identification. Learning Difficulties: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 1-15). French Forrest, NSW: Pearson Australia. 29. T. Subahan, (2007). Problem solving and human capital.Proceedings of the third international conference on research and education in mathematics (ICREM3). INSPEM: Universiti Putra Malaysia. 30. Tay Lay Heong, (2005). Problem solving abilities and strategies in solving multistep mathematical problems among form 2 students. Kertasprojeksarjana.University Malaya. 31. Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature. International Education Journal, 8(2): 187 – 203.