Published December 15, 2022 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Acontheus inarmatus Hutchinson 1962

  • 1. Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 234, 69120 Heidelberg (Germany) and Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Geophysik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44801 Bochum (Germany)
  • 2. Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 234, 69120 Heidelberg (Germany)

Description

Acontheus inarmatus Hutchinson, 1962

(Fig. 17)

Acontheus inarmatus Hutchinson, 1962: 109, pl. 16, figs 8a, b, 9.

Acontheus inarmatus minutus Sdzuy, 2000: 307, pl. 3, figs 1-5 (partim). — Geyer 2010: unnamed plate p. 84, fig. 7. — Heuse et al. 2010: fig. 4.16.

HOLOTYPE. — Specimen no. GSC No. 12053, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, by original designation, from the Manuels River Formation on the north shore of Highland Cove, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland, Canada.

DIAGNOSIS. — Glabella expands anteriorly up to three times wider than posterior part; faint glabellar furrows; rounded, inflated fixigenae; rounded genal angle; punctuate exoskeleton.

MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 14 cranidia of Acontheus inarmatus (for NFM numbers seeAppendix 1). All specimens range between 15.63 and 16.67 m (Fig. 2) of the Manuels River Formation, type locality, Conception Bay South, Newfoundland, Canada.

OCCURRENCE. — Acontheus inarmatus is a rare middle Cambrian taxon, reported from southeastern Canada, eastern Newfoundland, in the Paradoxides davidis Zone (Hutchinson 1962). It has further been documented from Germany (Sdzuy 2000).

DESCRIPTION

The cranidia range from 1.4 mm to 4.1 mm in width and from 1.3 mm to 3.9 mm in length. The cranidia are well-preserved as internal casts and moulds. The glabella is more domed than the cheeks and glabellar furrows are faintly preserved in two specimens (NFM F-3143 and NFM F-3659). The specimens have a smooth to slightly punctuate surface and none has the exoskeleton preserved.Two specimens bear an occipital node (NFM F-3211 and NFM F-3701) and three are pyritized.

REMARKS

Sdzuy (2000) introduced Acontheus inarmatus minutus based on a smoother exoskeleton than in Hutchinson’s (1962) specimens and a slightly differing occipital ring. Sdzuy (2000) acknowledged that these differences in eight cranidia and one pygidium, may have resulted from poor preservation of his specimens. We also refer to these differences as preservational and the result of intraspecific variation and assign Ac. inarmatus minutus as a synonym. The pygidium figured by Sdzuy (2000: pl. 3, fig. 6) does not match the characteristics of Acontheus and is here excluded from the genus. Geyer (2010) and Heuse et al. (2010) followed Sdzuy (2000) in applying the subspecies and illustrated both one of Sdzuy’s (2000) cranidia. The cranidia show the characteristics of Ac. inarmatus, so the specimens are here assigned to the species.

Notes

Published as part of Unger, Tanja, Hildenbrand, Anne, Stinnesbeck, Wolfgang & Austermann, Gregor, 2022, Biostratigraphy and taxonomy of polymerid trilobites of the Manuels River Formation (Drumian, middle Cambrian), Newfoundland, Canada, pp. 1051-1087 in Geodiversitas 44 (33) on page 1076, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2022v44a33, http://zenodo.org/record/7477657

Files

Files (3.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a2ef04ac5220a2f25c9e23f69f514c85
3.0 kB Download

System files (22.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bfa1a0a4a282475fd53905e3aecb6a09
22.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
GSC
Family
Corynexochidae
Genus
Acontheus
Kingdom
Animalia
Material sample ID
GSC No. 12053
Order
Corynexochida
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Hutchinson
Species
inarmatus
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype
Taxonomic concept label
Acontheus inarmatus Hutchinson, 1962 sec. Unger, Hildenbrand, Stinnesbeck & Austermann, 2022

References

  • HUTCHINSON R. D. 1962. - Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of southeastern Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 88 (1): 1 - 156. https: // doi. org / 10.4095 / 123902
  • SDZUY K. 2000. - Das Kambrium des Frankenwaldes, 3. Lippertsgruner Schichten und ihre Fauna. Senckenbergiana lethaea 79 (2): 301 - 327. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / bf 03043644
  • GEYER G. 2010. - Cambrian and lowermost Ordovician of the Franconian Forest, in FATKA O. & BUDIL P. (eds), The 15 th Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, Abstracts and Excursion Guide. Czech Geological Suvey, Prague: 78 - 92.
  • HEUSE T., BLUMENSTENGEL H., ELICKI O., GEYER G., HANSCH W., MALETZ J., SARMIENTO G. N. & WEYER D. 2010. - Biostratigraphy - The faunal province of the southern margin of the Rheic Ocean, in LINNEMANN U. & ROMER R. L. (eds), Pre-Mesozoic Geology of Saxo-Thuringia - From the Cadomian Active Margin to the Variscan Orogen. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart: 99 - 170.