Published December 31, 2007 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Siphonolabrum Lang 1972

Description

Genus Siphonolabrum Lang, 1972

Siphonolabrum Lang, 1971: 361, 365 (remarks), 367 (key to genera), as nomen nudum. Sieg, 1986b: 140 –142 (remarks on genus and key to species), 142–152, figs 95–99 (description of S. fastigatum).

Siphonolabrum Lang, 1972: 214 (generic diagnosis), 214–221, figs 1–4, plate 1 (description of S. mirabile). Sieg, 1983: 299 –300 (bibliography). Kudinova-Pasternak, 1984: 108 –109, figs 10–11 (description of S. langi). Gutu & Sieg (1999), 384 (classification). Dojiri & Sieg, 1997: 220 –224, figs 3.12–3.13 (description of S. californiensis). Larsen & Wilson, 2002: 12, 14 (classification derived from phylogenetic analysis). Bird, 2004: 2, 7–8 (remarks). Larsen, 2006: 141, 142 (remarks).

Type species: Siphonolabrum mirabile Lang, 1972, by monotypy.

Species included ( Japanese and trench species in bold): S. californiensis Dojiri & Sieg, 1997 (Santa Barbara Channel, California, 98 metres); S. fastigatum Sieg, 1986 (Joubin Islands, Antarctic Peninsula, 49–75 metres); S. langi, (Central Pacific, 1735–2430 metres); S. mirabile, (Guatemala Basin [Central East Pacific], 3534– 3563 metres, and the Azores [NE Atlantic], 4165 metres); S. tenebrosus n.sp .

Diagnosis (largely derived from Lang (1972) and Sieg (1986b) but with some amendments).

Female/neuter. Anarthrurid with pleon with five pleonites, about as wide as the pereonite 6 and pleotelson. Antennule of female four-articled. Antenna six-articled (but see below), terminal article very small. Labrum prominent, narrower than deep. Mandibles translucent and weak, incisor narrow, with denticulate tip, molar and lacinia mobilis lacking. Epignath with short terminal seta. Maxillule with eight unequal terminal setae. Maxilliped palp article 3 with three long setae; endite with one long seta. Cheliped propodus and fixed finger without fold, but with longitudinal ridge on latter; fixed finger with one ventral seta and two prominent teeth on incisive margin. Dactylus of pereopods 1–3 with long accessory seta. Carpus of pereopods 4–6 with three spiniform and one rod-like seta. Pleopods well-developed, biramous, with setae. Uropod exopod fused with basal article, short or as long as proximal article of endopod, with two terminal setae; endopod two-articled.

Male with enlarged pleon; antennule seven-articled (two-articled peduncle and five-articled flagellum), cheliped fixed finger with reduced teeth, pleopod with longer setae than female, uropod exopod articulated from basal article, endopod three-articled.

Remarks. Although the generic distinctions of Siphonolabrum from Anarthruropsis are said to be minor (Sieg 1986b; Larsen 2005), i.e. restricted to the number of maxillule endite spines and labrum shape, other characters appear to be valid, consistent and useful for making identifications: the probable existence of a mandibular molar in Anarthruropsis (for the type species A. galatheae at least), one long seta on each maxilliped endite in Siphonolabrum, rather than two small setae; one ventral cheliped fixed finger in Siphonolabrum – although A. edentula also has only one (possibly because only manca-II stages were described), and two prominent teeth on the fixed finger in Siphonolabrum. A more detailed revision of the two genera is desirable but is beyond the scope of this paper, as are analyses of phylogenetic relationships within and without the family Anarthruridae.

There may be an issue with the character-state given for the number of antennal articles, since the small ‘article’ figured by most authors and also in this paper (Figure 2 C) could be a basal peduncle, so that the actual article-number state could be ‘five’ rather than ‘six’. Ideally, scanning-electron-microscope study might resolve this problem.

Of the four previously described species, S. langi seems to be of dubious status within the genus, at least because the uropod exopod is shown by Kudinova-Pasternak (1981) as being discrete, not fused. In addition, the cheliped shape is more similar to those of some other taxa such as Robustochelia Kudinova-Pasternak, 1983 albeit having the anarthrurid or agathotanaid form of the attachment to the cephalothorax.

Apart from a dubious record (of a manca stage) from the North-East Atlantic (Azores) of S. mirabile (Lang 1972), the genus appears to be known so far only from the Pacific Ocean—the S. fastigatum records coming from the Pacific side of the Antarctic Peninsula.

Notes

Published as part of Bird, Graham J., 2007, Leptognathiidae Sieg, 1976 *, pp. 61-85 in Zootaxa 1599 on page 64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.178698

Files

Files (5.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3e2a367e3453a3d3433430f4dc6f98fb
5.1 kB Download

System files (22.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:327bafbbf823bebb53c3abcddd8beb3f
22.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Anarthruridae
Genus
Siphonolabrum
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Tanaidacea
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Lang
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Siphonolabrum Lang, 1972 sec. Bird, 2007

References

  • Lang, K. (1972) Siphonolabrum mirabile n. gen. n. sp. Crustaceana Supplement, 3, 214 - 220.
  • Lang, K. (1971) Taxonomische und phylogenetische Untersuchungen uber die Tanaidaceen. 6. Revision der Gattung Paranarthrura Hansen, 1913, und Aufstellung von zwei neuen Familien, vier neuen Gattungen und zwei neuen Arten. Arkiv for Zoologi, 23 (5), 361 - 340.
  • Sieg, J. (1986 b) Crustacea Tanaidacea of the Antarctic and the Subantarctic. 1. On material collected at Tierra del Fuego, Isla de los Estados, and the West Coast of the Antarctic Peninsula. Biology of the Antarctic Seas XVIII, ed. L. S. Korniker, Antarctic Research Series 45, American Geophysical Union, 180 pp.
  • Sieg, J. (1983) Tanaidacea. Crustaceorum Catalogus Pars 6, H. E. Gruner & L. B. Holthuis (eds), Dr. W. Junk publishers, The Hague, 552 pp.
  • Kudinova-Pasternak, R. K. (1984). Tanaidacea (Crustacea, Malacostraca) from the Sea of Japan. Zooloogeskij Zhurnal, 63, 828 - 837.
  • Gutu, M. & Sieg, J. (1999) Ordres des Tanaidaces (Tanaidacea Hansen, 1895). Memoires de l'Institut oceanographique, Monaco, 19, 353 - 389.
  • Dojiri, M. & Sieg, J. (1997) The Tanaidacea. In: Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel, Vol. 11 - The Crustacea Part 2, The Isopoda, Cumacea and Tanaidacea. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, p. 181 - 268.
  • Larsen, K. & Wilson, G. D. F. (2002) Tanaidacean phylogeny, the first step: the Superfamily Paratanoidea. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 40, 1 - 19.
  • Bird, G. J. (2004) Tanaidacea (Crustacea) of the Northeast Atlantic: non-filiform species of Anarthruridae Lang from the Atlantic Margin. Zootaxa, 471, 1 - 44.
  • Kudinova-Pasternak, R. K. (1981) Tanaidacea. In: Miranov A. V. [ed.] Benthos of the submarine mountains Marcus- Vecker and adjacent Pacific regions. Akademija Nauk SSSR, P. P. Shirshov Institute of oceanology, 94 - 112.
  • Kudinova-Pasternak, R. K. (1983) The abyssal Tanaidacea (Crustacea) of the Iberian and West-European hollows of the Atlantic Ocean. Zooloogeskij Zhurnal, 62 (8), 1170 - 1176.