Published December 31, 2009 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Metopa spinicoxa Shoemaker 1955

Description

Metopa spinicoxa Shoemaker,1955

Metopa spinicoxa Shoemaker 1955: 20 –22, fig 6 g –o

Type locality: off Point Barrow, Alaska (Shoemaker, 1955)

Material examined. Morphological examination: NMNH 96250, Type. Male (6mm). "off Point Barrow base, Alaska. 175 feet (53m), 4 miles (6.5km) out, Oct 14, 1949 ".

See figures 12, 13 and 14.

Morphological description. Male, 6mm. (Type)

Head (Fig. 12): small; epistome pointed (Shoemaker says "prominent, projected forward and cleft in the center by a deep sinus"); eyes approximately 1/3 head length, round and well defined. Antenna 1 (Fig. 12): shorter than in the other species described here, reaching about 0.5x body length; peduncle article 1 barely longer than head; article 2 shorter than article 1; no accessory flagellum observed; flagellum subequal to peduncle, 14-articulate, each article with two simple short setae distally. Antenna 2 (Fig. 12): slightly longer than antenna 1; peduncle strong, 2.5x length of flagellum, article 4 longer than article 5; flagellum 10- articulate. Mandible (Fig. 12): mandibular palp 2-articulate, article 1 short and "round", article 2 long and slender with several simple setae; cross-section circular; incisor and lacinia mobilis serrate and well developed, a strong row of 10 raker setae; no molar. Maxilla 1 (Fig. 12): inner plate with one simple seta; outer plate with three serrate and one conate setae, one pointed tooth and two rows of simple setae along inner margin and along distal margin; palp 1-articulate, weakly serrate with one short and one long simple seta for each serration, small tooth at apex, 2x length of outer plate. Maxilla 2 (Fig. 12): outer plate somewhat at normal position to inner plate, inner plate shortened, inner plate with one type A seta and five simple setae, outer plate with nine simple setae. Labrum (Fig. 12): rounded; bilobate; weakly asymmetrical. Maxilliped (Fig. 12): long and slim; inner plate well separated, several short simple setae at distal margin; outer plate short and thin, reaching 1/4 of palp article 1; palp 4-articulate, several simple setae along inner margin, few very thin simple setae along outer margin; article 3 with a thin cushion of short setae at distal margin and three type A setae, article 4 3-dimensional, thick row of short setae along the inner "flat" margin.

Pereon: smooth. Gnathopod 1 (Fig. 13): simple; coxa subquadrate; basis linear and naked; ischium subquadrate; merus distal margin nearly free, a cushion of simple setae along distal posterior margin, and six simple longer setae apically; carpus long and rectangular, a row of long simple setae on posterior margin; propodus slightly longer and thinner than carpus, narrowing at distal end, no palm, few long simple setae along straight posterior margin; dactylus reaching approximately 0.5x propodus, simple but strong, a row of strong short setae along inner/posterior margin, very weakly curved. Gnathopod 2: missing on type. Pereopod 3 (Fig. 13): long and slender; coxa subrectangular, short simple setae along posterior distal margin; rest of leg simple with few but strong simple setae sparsely spread along posterior margins of merus, carpus and propodus; dactylus reaching 0.5x propodus, simple, curved at distal margin, naked. Pereopod 4 (Fig. 13): coxa subtriangular, ventral margin rounded; rest of leg slender, double sets of strong setae along posterior margins of carpus and propodus; dactylus naked and simple, curved, reaching 0.5x propodus length. Pereopod 5 (Fig. 14): coxa small and weakly elongated posteriorly; basis slender; meral lobe reaching 0.5x carpus; dactylus reaching 0.7x propodus, naked and weakly curved; merus to propodus with double set of strong simple setae at anterior margin, merus with simple setae also at posterior margin. Pereopods 6 and 7 (Fig. 14): coxae small; basis posteriorly expanded, short strong setae along posterior margin; meral lobe as long as carpus on both legs, double sets of short simple setae along both margins; dactyli approximately 0.6–0.7 x propodus length, simple and smooth, weakly curved.

Urosome (Fig. 14): smooth. Epimeral plate 3 (Fig. 14): rounded, margins at right angles to each other. Uropod 1 (Fig. 14): longer than uropod 2; peduncle longer than rami, several short simple setae along outer margin; biramous, rami subequal, three strong setae around basis of inner ramus. Uropod 2 (Fig. 14): longer than uropod 3; biramous; peduncle subequal to inner ramus, inner ramus longer than outer ramus; peduncle with few simple setae, rami naked. Uropod 3 (Fig. 14): uniramous, ramus with two articles; peduncle with five strong setae, ramus inner article with one seta. Telson (Fig. 14): toungeshaped, elongate; flat; three pairs of robust setae.

Ecology: we have no notion about the ecology of this species. Shoemaker (1955) mentions females to be very similar to males, only a little smaller, and with shorter antennae.

Distribution: only known from type locality

Remarks: Shoemaker (1955) mentions this species to be very close to Metopa bruzelii (Goës, 1866) as it is figured in Sars (1890-95), but a little "stouter", especially gnathopod 2, which must have been taken out for special examination and is missing in the type. Because gnathopod 2 was missing in the examined specimen, the original description from Shoemaker (1955) is included here: "Gnathopod 2 moderately developed; sixth joint a little wider than the fifth and a little shorter than the second, front and hind margins slightly convex, and widest in the middle; palm oblique, a little shorter than hind margin of joint, convex, bearing low wavy teeth, the central one of which is the largest, defined by an angular process adjacent to which is a shallow sinus bearing a spine; seventh joint fitting palm and bearing a row of spinules on inner margin." Shoemaker further mentions this gnathopod to be more robust than in Metopa bruzelii, the palm of M. bruzelii being smooth and not having a sinus adjacent to the defining angle. Shoemaker (1955) further mentions a 3- articulate mandibular palp, here it is described as two-articulate, but this character seems to be a plastic character in the genus Metopa (Tandberg & Vader 2009).

Notes

Published as part of Tandberg, Anne Helene S., 2009, A redescription of Metopa species (Amphipoda, Stenothoidae) based on the type material. 2. The United States National Museum of Natural History (NMNH), pp. 43-68 in Zootaxa 2309 on pages 58-62, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.191826

Files

Files (6.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5de0effeddccfe60093e75ade865ed82
6.8 kB Download

System files (28.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8060a388983dfebfc235ab85232ed682
28.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Stenothoidae
Genus
Metopa
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Shoemaker
Species
spinicoxa
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Metopa spinicoxa Shoemaker, 1955 sec. Tandberg, 2009

References

  • Shoemaker, C. R. (1955) Amphipoda collected at the Arctic Laboratory, Office of Naval Research, Point Barrow, Alaska, by G. E. MacGinitie. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 128 (1), 1 - 78.
  • Goes, A. (1866) Crustacea Amphipoda maris Spetsbergiam alluentis, cum speciebus aliis arcticis enumerat. Ofversikt af Kungliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Forhandlingar 1865: 517 - 536.
  • Sars, G. O. (1890 - 95) The Crustacea of Norway. Volume 1. Amphipoda. Alb. Cammermeyers forlag, Christiania, Norway.
  • Tandberg, A. H. S. & Vader, W. (2009) A redescription of Metopa species (Amphipoda, Stenothoidae) based on the type material. 1. Zoological Museum, Copenhagen (ZMUC). Zootaxa, 2093, 1 - 36.