Planned intervention: On Thursday 19/09 between 05:30-06:30 (UTC), Zenodo will be unavailable because of a scheduled upgrade in our storage cluster.
Published July 7, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Adipicola leticiae Crespo 2017, new species

Description

Adipicola leticiae new species

Figs 2A ̄J, 3ĀK, 4ĀD

Type material. Holotype CNP-Inv 2 229 and twelve paratypes: CNP-Inv 2230, one articulated specimen, CNP-Inv 2231, one articulated specimen, CNP-Inv 2232, one articulated specimen and CNP-Inv 2233, nine articulated specimens, all attached to the skull of a sei whale Balaenoptera borealis.

Type locality. 46° 10´S; 61° 50´W, off San Jorge Gulf, Argentina, from a depth of 104 m (Fig. 1). The collection date was July 21, 2010.

Etymology. This species is dedicated to Leticia Mercante, the first author´s wife, for her invaluable support during many years.

Diagnosis. The new species is characterized by the combination of the following characters: adult shell of medium size, up to 20 mm in length, elongate, fragile, ventral margin straight, distance from umbos to anterior shell margin about 30% of shell length; larval shell with prodissoconch 1 of about 175 µm and prodissoconch 2 with a size between 425 to 580 µm in length.

Description. Shell, fragile, subequilateral, equivalve, subrectangular, with anterior end rounded, dorsalanterior margin anteriorly inclined, lunule not defined; dorsal-posterior margin straight, posterior end rounded, ventral margin straight; umbones prosogyrate, not in touch, placed at 30% of shell length measured from the anterior margin. Periostracum dark-reddish brown. Ligament extending along the dorsal-posterior margin for about 65% of posterior length. External surface smooth with irregular growth wrinkles, periostracal hair absent. Internally white, porcelaneous, pallial line complete, without sinus; hinge plate without teeth or crenulations below umbo or behind ligament; posterior adductor scar circular, anterior scar oval, slightly smaller; pedal retractors fused with the posterior byssal retractors just above the posterior scar; anterior retractor scars not observed; prodissoconch 1 about 175 µm, prodissoconch 2 size between 425 to 580 µm in length. No direct anatomical observations could be made on the dried remains.

Morphological comparisons. The conchological features are compared with other Bathymodiolinae species that were or still are placed in Adipicola. Among these, A. osseocola Dell, 1987, has a more sharply pointed anterior shell margin and its ventral margin is softly arched rather than straight (Figs 5A ̄B).

Adipicola pelagica (Forbes in Woodward, 1854) has a slightly arched ventral margin and a less forward-placed umbo (see B/L ratio) than A. leticiae n. sp.; it also attains a larger size of up to 36 mm in the holotype (Figs 5 C̄F).

The taxonomic position of A. projecta (Verco, 1908) is contentious. Originally described as Modiola Lamarck, 1801, Lamprell & Healy (1998) included it in Idas, Dell (1987) placed it in Adipicola, and Huber (2010) suggested a new genus for this species. Type material was not found in the cabinets of SAMA. The original description and illustration by Verco (1908, p. 195, pl.13, figs. 12̄13) suggest an Adipicola species distinguishable from our new species by a less elongate shell. Although the ventral border is nearly straight and almost parallel with the dorsal margin, both the shell length and ligament groove are shorter than in A. leticiae n. sp.

Adipicolalongissima Thiele & Jaeckel, 1931, is a regionally rather restricted species (Pante et al. 2012) that is predominantly attached to Nypa fruticans nuts, in localities where palm trees grow (Philippines, Indonesia and Solomon Islands mainly). Genetically, it clusters with “ Adipicola ” simpsoni Marshall, 1900. Therefore, Thubaut et al. (2013b) proposed a new generic name, “Nypamodiolus” for the two species. Unfortunately, the introduction of the genus name does not fulfil the requirements of the ICZN code (especially Art. 13) and is unavailable, therefore.

The types of “ A.longissima are smaller than the present species and possess a pellucid shell with a sharper, anteriorly more elongated and overall arched shell outline (Figs 5 ĪJ). “ Adipicolasimpsoni is characterized by a more elliptical, posteriorly expanded shell (Figs 6A ̄D) in contrast to the more subrectangular shape of our species. This is also reflected by different H/L and B/L ratios (Table 2).

The holotype of Gigantidas crypta (Dall, Bartsch & Rehder, 1938), previously placed in Adipicola by Dell (1987), is only about 4 mm long and has a slightly elevated and much forward-placed umbo. The shell outline is oval with a smaller posterior than anterior end and a slightly concave ventral margin. Much larger specimens of up to 52.9 mm were reported from Japan (Habe 1977; Habe in Koyama et al. 1981; Kurozumi 2000). According to genetic studies, the species must be placed in the genus Gigantidas Cosel & Marshall, 2003, related to G. gladius Cosel & Marshall, 2003 and the “ Bathymodioluschildressi group (Thubaut et al. 2013a).

Huber (2010) excluded Prashad’s Modiolus dubius from the genus Idas and placed it within Adipicola due to the absence of periostracal hairs and the non-glossy interior aspect. Our examination of the holotype and paratype (ZMA.MOLL.135265, ZMA.MOLL.135270) (Figs 5 ḠH) suggests otherwise. The holotype, from Rotti Island, Indonesia, shows a rhomboidal shell outline with conspicuous periostracal hairs over posterior portions of the shell. In addition, it shows a well-developed concentric sculpture and elongate ligament from the beak to virtually the end of the dorsal posterior margin. These morphological features are more characteristic of Idas.

Species Material Length (mm) Height (mm) B (mm) B/L H/L

Adipicola leticiae Holotype 20 7 5 23,9 33,7 Paratype 1 18 6 4 24,2 35,1 Paratype 2 17 6 4 25,2 36,0 Paratype 3 16 5 5 29,2 31,1 Paratype 4 16 6 5 29,0 35,8 Paratype 5 13 5 4 27,7 37,0 Paratype 6 9 4 2 22,8 39,3 Paratype 7 11 4 3 26,8 40,6 Paratype 8 10 4 3 24,0 38,9 Paratype 9 9 4 3 28,3 41,2 Paratype 10 9 3 2 27,1 38,5 Paratype 11 8 3 2 25,5 39,3 Paratype 12 9 4 2 21,1 42,5

A. osseocola * Holotype 24 9 6 24,6 37,3 Paratype 1 28 9 8 28,1 32,7 Paratype 2 24 9 6 26,4 36,2 Paratype 3 19 8 5 24,3 39,7

A. pelagica * Syntype 1 36 17 12 32,0 46,1 Syntype 2 32 14 10 31,0 44,9

A.simpsoni* Syntype 1 23 10 4 19,6 46,2 Syntype 2 21 10 3 15,0 45,9 Syntype 3 17 7 3 16,4 42,7 North Sea 20 9 4 21,4 44,4 Shetlands 19 8 4 19,4 42,5 Shetlands 18 8 4 19,7 43,8

T. pacifica * Holotype 27 11 6 22,6 42,6 Japan 150 m 26 12 8 32,4 45,3 Japan 150 m 15 7 4 25,0 48,0 Dell (1987) suggested that the types of A. iwaotakii (Habe, 1958) could belong to larger specimens of A. crypta. However, the genetic analysis by Thubaut et al. (2013b) places this species within Gigantidas and close to the Bathymodiolus “childressi group”.

Terua arcuatilis Dell, 1995, differs from A. leticiae n. sp. by having an arched rather than straight ventral margin, a longer ligament and a larger and more elongate shell (Figs 6 ĒF). Terua pacifica (Dall, Bartsch & Rehder, 1938) (Figs 6 ḠH) differs from the new species by having an arched ventral margin and a less elongate shell. Its collection sites in the Pacific off Oahu, Hawaii and southern Japan (Dell 1987; Habe 1977) also suggests that these are different species.

Notes

Published as part of Crespo, Enrique, 2017, First record of the genus Adipicola (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Mytilidae) and description of a new species from the Argentine SW Atlantic Ocean, pp. 325-338 in Zootaxa 4318 (2) on pages 329-332, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4318.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/886841

Files

Files (8.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d8668fcdb01f74388f1898f1cf0064ce
8.2 kB Download

System files (45.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b8c5650e438d1fbcbd15ee3f86dec3ec
45.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Event date
2010-07-21
Family
Mytilidae
Genus
Adipicola
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Mytiloida
Phylum
Mollusca
Scientific name authorship
Crespo
Species
leticiae
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype
Verbatim event date
2010-07-21
Taxonomic concept label
Adipicola leticiae Crespo, 2017

References

  • Dell, R. (1987) Mollusca of the family Mytilidae (Bivalvia) associated with organic remains from deep water off New Zealand, with revisions of the genera Adipicola Dautzenberg, 1927 and Idasola Iredale, 1915. National Museum of New Zealand Records, 3, 17 ‾ 36.
  • Woodward, S. P. (1854) A manual of the Mollusca; or rudimentary treatise of Recent and fossil shells. Part 2. J. Weale, London, xiii + 172 + 12 pp. [pp. ix - xii + 159 - 330 + 13 - 24 (plate explanations), 2 pp. errata and addenda, page " Notice "]
  • Verco, J. C. (1908) Notes on South Australian marine Mollusca, with descriptions of new species- part ix. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 32, 338 ‾ 361.
  • Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. (1801) Systeme des animaux sans vertebres, ou tableau general des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux. Chez l´auteur & Deterville, Paris, viii + 432 pp.
  • Lamprell, K. L. & Healy, J. M. (1998) Bivalves of Australia. Backhuys, Leiden, 288 pp.
  • Huber, M. (2010) Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world's marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research. ConchBooks, Hackenheim, 901 pp.
  • Thiele, J. K. H. & Jaeckel, S. H. F. (1931) Muscheln der Deutschen Tiefsee- Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer " Valdivia " 1898 ‾ 1899, 21, 159 ‾ 268.
  • Pante, E., Corbari, L., Thubaut, J., Chan, T., Mana, R., Boisselier, M. C., Bouchet, P. & Samadi, S. (2012) Exploration of the deep-sea fauna of Papua New Guinea. Oceanography, 25, 214 ‾ 225. https: // doi. org / 10.5670 / oceanog. 2012.65
  • Marshall, J. T. (1900) On a British species of Myrina, with a note on the genus Idas. Journal of Malacology, 1, 167 ‾ 170.
  • Thubaut, J., Puillandre, N., faure, B., Cruaud, C. & Samadi, S. (2013 b) The contrasted evolutionary fates of deep-sea chemosynthetic mussels (Bivalvia, Bathymodiolinae). Ecology and Evolution, 3, 4748 - 4766. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / ece 3.749
  • Dall, W., Bartsch, P. & Rehder, H. (1938) A manual of the Recent and fossil marine pelecypod mollusks of the Hawaiian Islands. Bulletin of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 153, 1 ‾ 233.
  • Habe, T. (1977) New and little known bivalves of Japan. Venus, 36, 1 ‾ 13.
  • Kurozumi, T. (2000) Mytilidae. In: Okutani, T. (Ed.), Marine mollusks in Japan. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp. 862 ‾ 877.
  • Cosel, R. von & Marshall, B. A. (2003) Two new species of large mussels (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) from active submarine volcanoes and a cold seep off the eastern North Island of New Zealand, with description of a new genus. The Nautilus, 117 (2), 31 ‾ 46.
  • Thubaut, J., Corbari, L., Gros, O., Duperron, S., Couloux, A. & Samadi, S. (2013 a) Integrative biology of Idas iwaotakii (Habe, 1958), A ' model species' associated with sunken organic substrates. PLoS ONE, 8, 1 - 15. https: // doi. org / 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0069680
  • Habe, T. (1958) Descriptions of five new bivalves from Japan. Venus, 20, 173 ‾ 180.
  • Dell, R. (1995) New species and records of deep-water mollusca from off New Zealand. Tuhinga, 2, 1 ‾ 26.