Published December 31, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Lamyctes Meinert 1868

Description

Genus Lamyctes Meinert, 1868

Hollington & Edgecombe (2004) placed Lamyctes in a well-supported phylogenetic group with Henicops and Paralamyctes. While Lamyctes species are found on all continents except Antarctica and on many oceanic islands, Henicops is limited to Australia, New Zealand and New Caledonia and Paralamyctes is found in Australia, New Zealand, southern South America, India, Madagascar, and South Africa (Hollington & Edgecombe 2004).

The worldwide distribution of Lamyctes is mainly, if not entirely, due to two or three Lamyctes species spread by human agency, and most populations probably have thelytokous parthenogenesis—accounting for the ease of distribution (Enghoff 1975; Enghoff et al. 2013; Iorio 2016). There are 42 currently recognized species of Lamyctes (Bonato et al. 2016). Of these, Lamyctes emarginatus Newport is found in continental North America, and L. coeculus Brölemann and L. africanus (Porat) have been reported from Hawaii (hence not included in the key). The USNM has L. coeculus specimens from the early 20th century intercepted at quarantine in Norfolk, Virginia, Houma, Louisiana, and Boston, Massachusetts. Auerbach (1952) reported it from a greenhouse in Urbana, Illinois, but there is no other documentation of any established populations of this species in North America north of Mexico (but see the discussion below of Buethobius translucens Williams & Hefner, 1928).

Unlike the blind L. coeculus, all of the recorded North American species have a single ocellus on each side of the head. Interspecific similarities in the coxal pore formulae and antennomere counts are within the range of variation found in L. emarginatus (see Zapparoli & Shelley 2000), and raise the question as to how many of the supposed species from North America may really be distinct. Mercurio (2010) expressed the opinon that L. tivius, L. pius and L. pinampus are synonyms of L. emarginatus, and the same may be true of L. diffusus and L. caducens (these latter two were incompletely described from single specimens), leaving no native Lamyctes species in North America. No male specimens of any of Chamberlin’s species have been reported. Indeed, the existence of any endemic species of Lamyctes in the Northern Hemisphere is questionable. It is worth noting that of the 42 species currently recognized, only four (aside from L. africanus, L. coeculus and L. emarginatus, the anthropochoric species) have been described from the Northern Hemisphere outside North America, three of these from islands (Bonato et al. 2016). It is very likely that these four northern hemisphere nominal species, as well as the North American species described by Chamberlin, may be synonyms of one or the other of the three “hitchhikers.”

Notes

Published as part of Shear, William A., 2018, The centipede family Anopsobiidae new to North America, with the description of a new genus and species and notes on the Henicopidae of North America and the Anopsobiidae of the Northern Hemisphere (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha), pp. 259-283 in Zootaxa 4422 (2) on page 265, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4422.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/1455619

Files

Files (3.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:25cbdc95584ed894b0315671f66b60e9
3.3 kB Download

System files (18.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8712b1e2f0d4ebc38165666ec437f73a
18.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Henicopidae
Genus
Lamyctes
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Lithobiomorpha
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Meinert
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Lamyctes Meinert, 1868 sec. Shear, 2018

References

  • Hollington, L. M. & Edgecombe, G. D. (2004) Two new species of the henicopid centipede Henicops (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) from Queensland and Victoria, with revision of species from Western Australia and synoptic classification of Henicopidae. Records of the Australian Museum, 56, 1 - 28. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.56.2004.1392
  • Enghoff, H. (1975) Notes on Lamyctes coeculus (Brolemann), a cosmopolitic, parthenogenetic centiped (Chilopoda: Henicopidae). Entomologica Scandanavia, 6, 45 - 46. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 187631275 X 00334
  • Enghoff, H., Akkari, N. & Pederson, J. (2013) Aliquid novi ex Africa? Lamyctes africanus (Porath, 1871) found in Europe (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha, Henicopidae). Journal of Natural History, 47, 1 - 24. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2012.763062
  • Bonato, L., Chagas Junior, A., Edgecombe, G. D., Lewis, J. G. E., Minelli, A., Pereira, L. A., Shelley, R. M., Stoev, P. & Zapparoli, M. (2016) ChiloBase 2.0. A World Catalogue of Centipedes (Chilopoda). Available from: http: // chilobase. biologia. unipd. it (accessed 11 May 2018)
  • Williams, S. R. & Hefner, R. A. (1928) The millipedes and centipedes of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin, 4, 91 - 146.
  • Zapporoli, M. & Shelley, R. M. (2000) The centipede order Lithobiomorpha in the Hawaiian Islands (Chilopoda). I. The epigean fauna. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 63, 35 - 49.
  • Mercurio, R. J. (2010) An annotated catalog of the centipedes (Chilopoda) from the United States of America, Canada and Greenland (1758 - 2008). XLibris Corporation, Bloomington, IN, 559 pp.