Published December 31, 2016 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Ptychogastria Allman 1878

Description

Genus Ptychogastria Allman, 1878

Pectyllis Haeckel, 1879: 265.

Pectanthis Haeckel, 1879: 267.

Pectyllis – Haeckel 1881a: 9; 1881b: 10.

Pectanthis – Haeckel 1881a: 17; 1881b: 19.

Diagnosis

Crawling ptychogastriid medusae with swimming capabilities; with dome-shaped, marginally-“lobed” umbrella, and eight-lobed manubrium, giving rise to as many mesenterial partitions of the subumbrellar cavity; mouth quadrangular, with simple lips; eight radial canals; centripetal canals either present or absent; eight pairs of gonads conFned to the sides of the manubrial lobes; tentacles Fliform and adhesive, occurring simultaneously and arranged in clusters around the bell margin; velum broad; 16 free, ectoendodermal statocysts (2 per octant).

Remarks

The diagnoses given by Bouillon & Boero (2000) and Bouillon et al. (2006) are broadened again, so as to include the shape of the umbrella, the presence/absence of centripetal canals, and the presence of a velum, as Allman (1878) and/or Mayer (1910) did earlier.

As underlined by Mayer, the «differences between the genera “ Pectyllis,” “ Pectis,” and “ Pectanthis,” as deFned by Haeckel, are so slight as to appear of speciFc rather than of generic value». Indeed, Haeckel (1879) distinguished Pectis (type species Pectis antarctica) from both Pectanthis (type species Pectanthis asteroides) and Pectyllis (type species Pectyllis arctica) through the presence of centripetal canals. In contrast, the tentacles were described as arranged in distinct groups in Pectanthis, and forming comparatively more contiguous groups in both Pectis and Pectyllis.

Similarly, Browne (1903) acknowledged earlier that “When Pectis antarctica and Pectanthis asteroides have been again examined it may be found that one genus with three species will be quite sufFcient”. However, it will be shown at the end of this paper that the former species does not belong to Ptychogastriidae, but to a different family of Trachymedusae, viz. Rhopalonematidae Russell, 1953.

Key to species:

1. Centripetal canals absent …………………………………………… P. asteroides (Haeckel, 1879)

– Centripetal canals present ……………………………………………………… P. polaris Allman, 1878

Notes

Published as part of Horia R. Galea, Cornelia Roder, Christoph Walcher, Marco Warmuth, Eberhard Kohlberg & Philipp F. Fischer, 2016, Glaciambulata neumayeri gen. et sp. nov., a new Antarctic trachymedusa (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa), with a revision of the family Ptychogastriidae, pp. 1-30 in European Journal of Taxonomy 252 on page 11, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2016.252, http://zenodo.org/record/221250

Files

Files (2.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2aef786540a842564302890f603cbdcb
2.9 kB Download

System files (20.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a69c3fd3587ac7291458b6928bbd3f53
20.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

References

  • Allman G. J. 1878. Appendix No. XI. Hydrozoa. In: Feilden H. W. (ed.) Narrative of a voyage to the Polar Sea during 1875 - 6 in H. M. ships " Alert " and " Discovery " by Capt. G. S. Nares 2: 290 - 292. Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, London. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 6828
  • Haeckel E. 1879. Das System der Medusen. Erster Theil einer Monographie der Medusen. Mit einem Atlas von vierzig Tafeln. Gustav Fisher, Jena. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 46856
  • Haeckel E. 1881 a. Monographie der Medusen. Zweiter Theil. Erste Halfte: Die Tiefsee-Medusen der Challenger-Reise. Zweite Halfte: Der Organismus der Medusen. Gustav Fischer, Jena. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 46856
  • Bouillon J. & Boero F. 2000. Phylogeny and classiFcation of Hydroidomedusae. Synopsis of the families and genera of the Hydroidomedusae of the world, with a list of the worldwide species. Thalassia Salentina 24: 47 - 296.
  • Bouillon J., Gravili C., Pages F., Gili J. M. & Boero F. 2006. An introduction to Hydrozoa. Memoires du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle 194, Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1086 / 586983
  • Mayer A. G. 1910. Medusae of the world. Vol. II. The hydromedusae. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 109: 231 - 498. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 5996
  • Browne E. T. 1903. Report on some medusae from Norway and Spitzbergen. Bergens Museum Arbog 1903: 1 - 36.