Published October 17, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Epimeria (Subepimeria) iota d'Acoz & Verheye 2017, sp. nov.

  • 1. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Service Heritage, Rue Vautier 29, B- 1000 Brussels, Belgium. & Corresponding author: cdudekem @ naturalsciences. be
  • 2. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational direction Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Rue Vautier 29, B- 1000 Brussels, Belgium. & Email: mverheye @ naturalsciences. be

Description

Epimeria (Subepimeria) iota sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 7A557F8F-058F-413B-998C-AED9C9D23EE6

Figs 299–306

Epimeria puncticulata – Watling & Holman 1981: 213, in part, fig. 21.

Epimeria aff. puncticulata –? Rauschert & Arntz 2015: 61, pl. 54, unnumbered photograph.

‘ Clade B puncticulata complex - PUN1’ – Verheye et al. 2016a, supplement: 3 (online).

non Epimeria puncticulata K.H. Barnard, 1930: 377, fig. 42.

Etymology

Iota is the smallest letter of the Greek alphabet. The name, which is a noun in apposition, alludes to the small size of the species.

Type material

Holotype

RV Polarstern cruises:

SOUTHERN OCEAN: sex undetermined, cruise PS81, ANT-XXIX/3, stn 197-6, Bransfield Strait, 62°45.05ʹ S, 57°26.68ʹ W to 62°45.09ʹ S, 57°26.47ʹ W, 210–222 m, black gravel mixed with sand and a little bit of mud, Rauschert dredge, 25 Feb. 2013, coll. C. d’Udekem d’Acoz and M. Verheye (RBINS, INV. 122947) [extraction ANT 48; Genbank nr, 28S: KU759607].

Paratypes

RV Polarstern cruises:

SOUTHERN OCEAN: 1 spec., cruise PS69, ANT-XXIII/8, stn 605-3, Elephant Island, 61°20.33ʹ S, 55°31.53ʹ W to 61°20.35ʹ S, 55°30.18ʹ W, 148–154 m, Agassiz trawl, 20 Dec. 2006, coll. C. d’Udekem d’Acoz and H. Robert (RBINS, INV. 122519); 2 specs, cruise PS69, ANT-XXIII/8, stn 614-3/4/5, Elephant Island, 60°52.37ʹ S, 55°29.80ʹ W to 60°52.71ʹ S, 55°27.83ʹ W, 248–265 m, a lot of epifauna, Rauschert dredge and Agassiz trawl, 22 Dec. 2006, coll. C. d’Udekem d’Acoz and H. Robert (RBINS, INV. 122525); 1 spec., sex undetermined, cruise PS81, ANT-XXIX/3, stn 164-5, south of Dundee Island, 63°36.84ʹ S, 56°10.28ʹ W to 63°36.72ʹ S, 56°10.46ʹ W, 121–122 m, Rauschert dredge, 11 Feb. 2013, coll. C. d’Udekem d’Acoz and M. Verheye (RBINS, INV. 122934) [extraction K42; Genbank nr, 28S: KU759655].

Description

Basis of description. Description based on holotype.

ROSTRUM. In lateral view fairly short and fairly narrow; distinctly curved, posterior border straight, tip acute; in frontal view narrowly triangular, fairly narrow and with almost straight converging borders, with tip blunt; not reaching tip of article 1 of peduncle of antenna 1.

EYES. Very large, nearly circular (very broadly elliptic).

PEREION–PLEOSOME TOOTH PATTERN. Pereionites 1–7 and pleonite 1 totally smooth; pleonite 2 with small, posterodorsal tooth; pleonite 3 carinate, with posterodorsal tip forming a small, low, rounded lobe very weakly projecting backwards.

COXAE 1–3. Tip blunt.

COXA 4. Narrow; anterodorsal border nearly straight, curving ventrally and followed by weakly curved anteroventral border; anterior corner very rounded but distinct, projecting forward; ventral corner forming a broadly rounded squared angle; posteroventral border distinctly concave; ratio length of posterodorsal border / length of posteroventral border: 0.7.

COXA 5. Very broad, posteroventral corner with broadly rounded angular discontinuity.

COXA 6. Posterior border rounded.

EPIMERAL PLATES 1–3. Posteroventral angle rounded in plate 1, produced into a small tooth in plate 2; produced into a medium-sized tooth in plate 3.

UROSOME TOOTH PATTERN. Urosomite 1 with medium-sized blunt triangular dorsal process; urosomite 3 with dorsolateral borders straight, with tip bluntly angulate.

TELSON. Broad, with lateral border strongly converging, with lobes distally broad, slit narrowly U-shaped, cleft on 0.3.

GNATHOPODS 1–2. Carpus and propodus of normal slenderness; propodus not narrowing distally, and palm weak but distinct.

PEREIOPOD 5. Basis of normal width, with posteroproximal process indistinct (reduced to very low proximal dilatation in continuity with the more distal part of the posterior border), with posterodistal corner forming a blunt-tipped broadly triangular process (squared angle), not projecting backwards; merus, carpus and propodus stout.

PEREIOPOD 6. Basis of normal width, with posteroproximal process indistinct (reduced to very low proximal dilatation in continuity with the more distal part of the posterior border), with posterior border parallel to anterior border, with posterodistal corner forming a rounded triangular process (very rounded squared angle) not projecting backwards; merus, carpus and propodus stout.

PEREIOPOD 7. Basis broad; posterior border nearly straight, with trace of concavity in distal 0.8, terminated into an obtuse rounded lobe.

Variations

The sequenced holotype is obviously immature. Adult specimens preserved in formalin interpreted as adult Epimeria iota sp. nov. have broader coxa 4, a stronger posterodistal tooth on the basis of pereiopods 5 and 6, sometimes a trace of a posterodorsal tooth or bump on pleonite 1 and a more obtuse dorsal process on urosomite 1.

Colour pattern

Holotype: background whitish (some areas very pale pinkish or very pale yellowish); head, pereionites 3–5, lower part of epimeral plates, posterior border of pleonite 3 and urosomites 1–2 suffused with orange-red; two red dots on the anterior part of coxa 4; a large red dot on first epimeral plate; eyes reddish.

Body length

The holotype is 9.5 mm. Non sequenced specimens interpreted as adult E. iota sp. nov. reach 16 mm.

Distribution

Tip of Antarctic Peninsula and Elephant Island, 121– 265 m.

Remarks

The specimens from the stations 605-3 and 614-3/4/5 of ANT-XXIII/8 are interpreted as adult Epimeria (Subepimeria) iota sp. nov. They possess the following character states of E. iota sp. nov.: (1) the anterior margin of their coxa 4 has an angular discontinuity (forming a regular curve in E. teres sp. nov.), and (2) the margins of the basis of pereiopod 6 are parallel (diverging in E. teres sp. nov.). The ‘ Epimeria puncticulata ’ illustrated by Watling & Holman (1981) and the ‘ Epimeria aff. puncticulata ’ illustrated by Rauschert & Arntz (2015: 61, pl. 54) presumably belong to the same morphospecies as well. The collection details are not given by Rauschert & Arntz (2015), but are indicated in an early draft of their book made available to the authors: ANT-XXI/2 stn 276 [i.e., 276-1], 71°06.44ʹ S, 11°27.76ʹ W to 71°06.64ʹ S, 11°27.28ʹ W, 268–277 m, eastern shelf of the Weddell Sea.

Notes

Published as part of d'Acoz, Cédric d'Udekem & Verheye, Marie L., 2017, Epimeria of the Southern Ocean with notes on their relatives (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Eusiroidea), pp. 1-553 in European Journal of Taxonomy 359 on pages 146-148, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.359, http://zenodo.org/record/3855694

Files

Files (7.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:65fc469c7964ad87779bcce83cb054a1
7.1 kB Download

System files (36.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3ddb60ad407e426a1700195a2307d4aa
36.8 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
RBINS, ANT
Event date
2013-02-25
Family
Epimeriidae
Genus
Epimeria
Kingdom
Animalia
Material sample ID
RBINS, INV. 122947, ANT48
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
d'Acoz & Verheye
Species
iota
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype
Verbatim event date
2013-02-25
Taxonomic concept label
Epimeria (Subepimeria) iota d'Acoz & Verheye, 2017

References

  • Watling L. & Holman H. 1981. Additional acanthonotozomatid, paramphitoid and stegocephalid Amphipoda from the Southern Ocean. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 94 (1): 181 - 227. Available from http: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 34608032 [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].
  • Rauschert M. & Arntz W. E. 2015. Antarctic Macrobenthos. A Field Guide of the Invertebrates Living at the Antarctic Seafloor: Arntz & Rauschert Selbstverlag, Deichweg.
  • Verheye M., Backeljau T. & d'Udekem d'Acoz C. 2016 a. Looking beneath the tip of the iceberg: diversification of the genus Epimeria on the Antarctic shelf (Crustacea, Amphipoda). In: Gutt J., David B. & Isla E. (eds) High environmental variability and steep biological gradients in the waters off the northern Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology 39 (5): 925 - 945, online supplementary material https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 00300 - 016 - 1910 - 5
  • Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic (" Terra Nova ") Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from http: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 195187 # page / 7 / mode / 1 up [accessed 12 Sep. 2017].