Published June 1, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Alamprops krasheninnikovi Gerken 2018, n. comb.

Creators

Description

Alamprops krasheninnikovi (Derzhavin. 1926) n. comb.

Lamprops krasheninnikovi Derzhavin, 1926: 179, pl. 3 fig. 6, pl. 6.

Lamprops quadriplicata krasheninnikovi.— Lomakina 1955: 137; 1958: 84–85.—Lie 1968: 297, 553.

Type material. Deposition unknown. Petropavlovsk Bay, Kamschatka Peninsula. Not seen.

Diagnosis. Carapace with 4 lateral ridges; eyelobe with lenses, not extending to anterior border of pseudorostrum. Telson with 2 pairs of lateral setae, 5 terminal setae, central seta longest, outermost pair longer than inner pair. Uropod peduncle with 9 medial setae; uropod exopod article 1 1.0 length of article 2. Male with antennal flagellum long.

Depth. 25–30 m.

Distribution. Petropavlovsk Bay, Kamschatka Peninsula; Okhotsk Sea; Bering Sea.

Remarks. This species was originally described by Derzhavin (1926) from Kamchatka, and placed as a subspecies of A. quadriplicatus by Lomakina (1955). The current understanding of A. quadriplicatus is that the species is restricted to the northwestern Atlantic, on the American and Canadian Atlantic coasts. Thus, A. krasheninnikovi is returned to the original status of a separate species. A record of Lamprops krasheninnikovi by Zimmer (1943) from Vancouver is likely either a new species or a representative of A. augustinensis (Gerken, 2005), but the specimen was not seen. Likewise, a specimen identified by Zimmer as krashenninikovi from Corona del Mar, California (USNM 92076) is not krashenninikovi. Alamprops krasheninnikovi can be distinguished from A. longispina by the outermost pair of terminal setae on the telson being equal to the central seta; in A. longispina the outer most pair is twice as long or more than the central seta. Alamprops krasheninnikovi can be distinguished from A. quadriplicatus by the proportions of pereopods 1 and 2. In A. krasheninnikovi the dactylus of pereopod 1 is 0.8 the length of the propodus, and the dactylus of pereopod 2 is 0.6 the length of the propodus; in A. quadriplicatus the dactylus of pereopod 1 is 0.9 the length of the propodus, and the dactylus of pereopod 2 is equal to the propodus. Alamprops krasheninnikovi can be distinguished from A. augustinensis by the antennal peduncle, in A. augustinensis the first peduncle article is longer than the second, while in A. krasheninnikovi the first peduncle article is equal to the second article.

Notes

Published as part of Gerken, Sarah, 2018, The Lampropidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) of the World, pp. 1-192 in Zootaxa 4428 (1) on page 16, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4428.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3769771

Files

Files (3.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2c58ca39abff84f92b77c18ea6bcfc3a
3.0 kB Download

System files (16.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9a72a68056206b77082d937983d5a85f
16.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Lampropidae
Genus
Alamprops
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Cumacea
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Gerken
Species
krasheninnikovi
Taxonomic status
comb. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype
Taxonomic concept label
Alamprops krasheninnikovi (Derzhavin., 1926) sec. Gerken, 2018

References

  • Derzhavin, A. N. (1926) The Cumacea of the Kamchatka Expedition. Russische Hydrobiologische Zeitschrift, 5, 174 - 182, pls. III-VI.
  • Lomakina, N. (1955) Order Cumacea. Atlas of the invertebrates of the far eastern seas of the USSR, 169 - 172.
  • Gerken, S. (2005) Two new cumaceans (Crustacea: Peracarida) from Cook Inlet, Alaska. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 118, 674 - 691. https: // doi. org / 10.2988 / 0006 - 324 X (2005) 118 [674: TNCCPF] 2.0. CO; 2