Published August 25, 2025 | Version v3
Dataset Open

Context-dependent effects of deer on aboveground carbon stocks in the regenerative tree layer in temperate and boreal forests: a meta-analysis

  • 1. ROR icon Wageningen University & Research
  • 2. ROR icon Utrecht University
  • 3. ROR icon Nelson Mandela University
  • 4. ROR icon Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • 5. ROR icon Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • 6. Independent Researcher
  • 7. ROR icon Polish Academy of Sciences
  • 8. ROR icon Université Laval
  • 9. ROR icon Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • 10. Wageningen Environmental Research
  • 11. ROR icon Indiana University of Pennsylvania
  • 12. ROR icon Warsaw University of Life Sciences
  • 13. ROR icon Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • 14. ROR icon Swedish Society for Nature Conservation
  • 15. ROR icon Mammal Research Institute
  • 16. ROR icon Umeå University
  • 17. ROR icon Natural Resources Institute Finland
  • 18. Center for Forest Research
  • 19. ROR icon Ministère de l'Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs

Description

Herbivores, including deer (Cervidae), influence ecosystem functions and carbon cycling by affecting vegetation structure and composition. Given the increase in deer populations in Europe and North America, there is growing interest in their impact on carbon dynamics in temperate and boreal forests. We investigated the effects of deer on carbon stored in the seedling and sapling layer through two mechanisms: (1) deer affecting the overall aboveground woody biomass in these strata and (2) deer changing the composition of tree species in these strata, because species differ in wood density and carbon content. We performed a meta-analysis of 17 datasets from 12 studies, assessing the effects of deer exclusion on aboveground carbon stocks within the seedling and sapling layer (≤3m) under two scenarios of carbon calculation, where we used either: (1) species-specific carbon content and wood density values (mean scenario) and (2) generic carbon content and wood density values (neutral scenario). Our results show that including species-specific wood density values in calculations had a minimal effect on the estimated impact of deer exclusion on carbon stocks compared to generic values, but that there was insufficient data on species-specific carbon content to determine its importance in calculating aboveground carbon stocks. Our results show that preventing deer herbivory did not have a consistent positive effect on aboveground carbon stocks in the regenerating forest layer, except in sites dominated by conifer saplings and boreal sites. Instead, the among-case variability in effects suggests a complex interaction between the impact of deer browsing and forest carbon. Understanding these interactions is vital to assess wildlife-carbon relations and to develop appropriate forest conservation approaches in response to growing deer populations.

Files

SuppInfoC.zip

Files (652.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9be0510fb4eb686cb4e64562e174a5c9
652.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Software

Programming language
R