Editorial Policy

Our editorial policy is based on the principles of quality, integrity, transparency, and open access.

1. Quality

We publish original, high-quality research that advances knowledge across disciplines. All manuscripts are evaluated based on:

• Scientific soundness
• Clarity and coherence
• Contribution to the field

2. Integrity and Ethics

We strictly adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines to maintain the highest ethical standards.

Authors must ensure:

• Original work with proper citations
• No plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification of data
• Appropriate authorship attribution
• Disclosure of any conflicts of interest

Editors and reviewers follow confidentiality and impartiality in all editorial decisions.

3. Transparency

Our submission and publication process is clear at every stage. Authors are informed promptly about decisions, revisions, and publication status.

4. Open Access and Licensing

All articles are published under open access, ensuring free availability to readers worldwide. We use the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, allowing sharing and adaptation with proper attribution.

Peer Review Process

We implement a rapid single-blind peer review process, combining speed and academic rigor to support researchers in timely dissemination of their work.

• Review Model:

Single-blind peer review – Reviewers remain anonymous, while author names are known to reviewers.

• Average Review Time:
  1–3 days

• Steps in the Peer Review Process:

1. Initial Editorial Assessment (within 1 day)
   The editorial team checks submissions for journal scope, formatting, and originality.
2. Reviewer Assignment (same day)
   Manuscripts passing the initial check are assigned to at least one expert reviewer in the relevant field.
3. Peer Review (1–3 days)
   Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
   • Scientific validity and methodology
   • Relevance and significance of findings
   • Clarity of presentation
4. Editorial Decision (same day post-review)
   Based on reviewer recommendations, the editor issues:
   • Acceptance
   • Minor or major revisions
   • Rejection
5. Revision (if applicable)
   Authors revise and resubmit within the provided timeframe. Revised submissions may be sent back to reviewers or evaluated by editors directly.
6. Final Acceptance and Publication
   Once accepted, articles are submitted to the printers and published within the established timeframe, ensuring rapid distribution..