Published May 22, 2017 | Version v1

Figure 2 from: Rees J, Cranston K (2017) Automated assembly of a reference taxonomy for phylogenetic data synthesis. Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e12581. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e12581

  • 1. Duke University, Durham, United States of America

Description

Figure 2 - Examples of grafting and insertion when combining taxonomies. In both cases, the NCBI taxonomy has higher priority than GBIF. In A (grafting), we assemble the genus Bufo across NCBI and GBIF. There is no B. spinosis in GBIF and no B. luchunnicus in NCBI. Therefore, the Bufo in the combined taxonomy has as its children copies of species records from both sources. In B (insertion), WoRMS provides greater resolution of Fissurellidae than NCBI taxonomy: it divides the family into subfamilies Hemotominae and Emarginulinae, nodes that do not exist in NCBI. The subfamilies are 'inserted' in a way that adds information without disrupting existing relationships from NCBI.

Files

Files (79.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3d1a6ad4da2d559bd70534b13e8e6dac
79.0 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
10.3897/BDJ.5.e12581 (DOI)