Published May 5, 2015
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Supplementary material 1 from: Sim IMW, Wilkinson NI, Scridel D, Anderson D, Roos S (2015) Food supplementation does not increase demographic rates in a passerine species of conservation concern. Nature Conservation 10: 25-43. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.4556
Authors/Creators
- 1. RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- 2. Imperial College London, Berkshire, United Kingdom
- 3. Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Description
Supplementary Information: Explanation note: Details of the models predicting adult ring ouzel provisioning rate to nestlings, fledging success, brood size at fledging in successful nests, nestling BCI at fledging, within-brood variation in nestling BCI at fledging, and juvenile survival probability for up to 100 days post-fledging.
Files
Files
(52.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0ef4b9fa00400a083e954bcad594e346
|
52.0 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- 10.3897/natureconservation.10.4556 (DOI)