Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 29, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Insect noise avoidance in the dawn chorus of Neotropical birds

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A.
  • 2. Animal Physiology, Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany

Description

Stanley, Calandra Q., Walter, Michael H., Venkatraman, Madhvi X., Wilkinson, Gerald S. (2016): Insect noise avoidance in the dawn chorus of Neotropical birds. Animal Behaviour 112: 255-265, DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.003, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.003

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFA44610B943FFDEAB75FFB09E448829

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8413484 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8413486 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8413488 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF4BDFF6B946FFDBAB2DF8A79A858F12 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8413490 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF4BDFF6B945FFD8AB04F90B9E988EDE (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8413494 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8413496 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF4BDFF6B94BFFD6AB04FF049AFF88F1 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF4BDFF6B949FFD4A84AFDCF9AD28A92 (URL)

References

  • Allard, H. A. (1930). The first morning song of some birds of Washington, District of Columbia; its relation to light. American Naturalist, 64, 436-469.
  • Armstrong, E. A. (1963). Songs for all occasions: significance of singing as a part of bird behavior. Animal Kingdom, 66, 27-29.
  • Berg, K. S., Brumfield, R. T., & Apanius, V. (2006). Phylogenetic and ecological determinants of the Neotropical dawn chorus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 999-1005.
  • Brenowitz, E. A. (1982). The active space of red-winged blackbird song. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 147, 511-522.
  • Brown, T. J., & Handford, P. (2003). Why birds sing at dawn: the role of consistent song transmission. Ibis, 145, 120-129.
  • Brumm, H. (2004). The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 434-440.
  • Brumm, H., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2005). Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 151-209.
  • Brumm, H., & Todt, D. (2002). Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Animal Behaviour, 63, 891-897.
  • Diwakar, S., & Balakrishnan, R. (2007). The assemblage of acoustically communicating crickets of a tropical evergreen forest in southern India: call diversity and diel calling patterns. Bioacoustics, 16, 113-135.
  • Endler, J. A. (1992). Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist, 139, 125-153.
  • Endler, J. A. (1993). Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 340, 215-225.
  • Ficken, R. W., Ficken, M. S., & Hailman, J. P. (1974). Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science, 183, 762-763.
  • Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biology Letters, 3, 368-370.
  • Gil, D., Honarmand, M., Pascual, J., Perez-Mena, E., & Macias Garcia, C. (2015). Birds living near airports advance their dawn chorus and reduce overlap with aircraft noise. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 435-443.
  • Henwood, K., & Fabrick, A. (1979). A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. American Naturalist, 114, 260-274.
  • Holdridge, L. R. (1967). Life zone ecology (Rev. ed.). San Jose, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center.
  • Hutchinson, J. M. (2002). Two explanations of the dawn chorus compared: how monotonically changing light levels favour a short break from singing. Animal Behaviour, 64, 527-539.
  • Kacelnik, A. (1979). The foraging efficiency of great tits (Parus major L.) in relation to light intensity. Animal Behaviour, 27, 237-241.
  • Kirschel, A. N. G., Blumstein, D. T., Cohen, R. E., Buermann, W., Smith, T. B., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2009). Birdsong tuned to the environment: green hylia song varies with elevation, tree cover, and noise. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 1089-1095.
  • Knapton, R. W. (1987). Intraspecific avoidance and interspecific overlap of song series in the eastern meadowlark. Auk, 104, 775-779.
  • Krams, I. (2001). Communication in crested tits and the risk of predation. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1065-1068.
  • Lang, A. B., Kalko, E. K. V., R omer ¨ , H., Bockholdt, C., & Dechmann, D. K. N. (2006). Activity levels of bats and katydids in relation to the lunar cycle. Oecologia, 146, 659-666.
  • Lang, A. B., Teppner, I., Hartbauer, M., & R¨ omer, H. (2005). Predation and noise in communication networks of Neotropical katydids. In P. K. McGregor (Ed.), Animal communication networks (pp. 152-169). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lengagne, T., Aubin, T., Lauga, J., & Jouventin, P. (1999). How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 1623-1628.
  • Leopold, A., & Eynon, A. E. (1961). Avian daybreak and evening song in relation to time and light intensity. Condor, 63, 269-293.
  • Luther, D. (2009). The influence of the acoustic community on songs of birds in a Neotropical rainforest. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 864-871.
  • Luther, D., & Gentry, K. (2013). Sources of background noise and their influence on vertebrate acoustic communication. Behaviour, 150, 1045-1068.
  • Marten, K., Quine, D., & Marler, P. (1977). Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization II. Tropical forest habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2, 291-302.
  • McNamara, J., Mace, R., & Houston, A. (1987). Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging in a bird singing to attract a mate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20, 399-405.
  • Morton, E. S. (1975). Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. American Naturalist, 109, 17-34.
  • Nischk, F., & Riede, K. (2001). Bioacoustics of two cloud forest ecosystems in Ecuador compared to a lowland rainforest with special emphasis on singing cricket species. In J. Nieder, & W. Barthlott (Eds.), Epiphytes and canopy fauna of the Otongan rainforest (Ecuador) (Vol. 2, pp. 217-242). Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand GmBH.
  • Nordt, A., & Klenke, R. (2013). Sleepless in town -drivers of the temporal shift in dawn song in urban European blackbirds. PLoS One, 8, e71476.
  • Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R., et al. (2013). Vegan: Community ecology package (Version 2.3-1). http://cran.r-project. org. https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan.
  • Paez, V. P., Bock, B. C., & Rand, A. S. (1993). Inhibition of evoked calling of Dendrobates pumilio due to acoustic interference from cicada calling. Biotropica, 25, 242-245.
  • Planque, R., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2008). Spectral overlap in songs and temporal avoidance in a Peruvian bird assemblage. Ethology, 114, 262-271.
  • Popp, J. W., Ficken, R. W., & Reinartz, J. A. (1985). Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds. Auk, 102, 744-748.
  • Potash, L. M. (1972). A signal detection problem and possible solution in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Animal Behaviour, 20, 192-195.
  • Rodriguez, A., Gasc, A., Pavoine, S., Grandcolas, P., Gaucher, P., & Sueur, J. (2014). Temporal and spatial variability of animal sound within a Neotropical forest. Ecological Informatics, 21, 133-143.
  • Ryan, M. J., & Brenowitz, E. A. (1985). The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. American Naturalist, 126, 87-100.
  • Schmidt, A. K. D., R¨ omer, H., & Riede, K. (2013). Spectral niche segregation and community organization in a tropical cricket assemblage. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 470-480.
  • Slabbekoorn, H. (2004). Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3727-3733.
  • Slabbekoorn, H., & den Boer-Visser, A. (2006). Cities change the songs of birds. Current Biology, 16, 2326-2331.
  • Slabbekoorn, H., & Smith, T. B. (2002). Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution, 56, 1849-1858.
  • Stiles, F. G., Skutch, A. F., & Gardner, D. (1989). A guide to the birds of Costa Rica (Rev. ed.). London, U.K.: Christopher Helm.
  • Thomas, R. J., Szekely, T., Cuthill, I. C., Harper, D. G. C., Newson, S. E., Frayling, T. D., et al. (2002). Eye size in birds and the timing of song at dawn. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 831-837.
  • Thorstrom, R. (2007). Home ranges of barred (Micrastur ru fi collis) and collared (M. semitorquatus) forest-falcons during the breeding season in Tikal National Park, Guatemala. Ornitologia Neotropical, 18, 395-405.
  • Wiley, R. H. (1994). Errors, exaggeration, and deception in animal communication. In L. Real (Ed.), Behavioral mechanisms in ecology (pp. 157-189). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wiley, R. H. (2006). Signal detection and animal communication. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 36, 217-247.
  • Willis, E. O. (1974). Populations and local extinctions of birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monographs, 44, 153-169.
  • Wood, W. E., & Yezerinac, S. M. (2006). Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk, 123, 650-659.