Published September 27, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Dataset related to article "Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rate after Single-Stage Hardware Removal and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study"

  • 1. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20072 Rozzano (Mi) – Italy AND Fondazione Livio Sciutto Ricerca Biomedica in Ortopedia-ONLUS, Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy
  • 2. Section of Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, "Federico II" University of Naples, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
  • 3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy
  • 4. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20072 Rozzano (Mi) – Italy AND Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy AND Fondazione Livio Sciutto Ricerca Biomedica in Ortopedia-ONLUS, Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy

Description

This record contains raw data related to article "Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rate after Single-Stage Hardware Removal and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study"

Abstract: Background: Single-stage hardware removal and total hip arthroplasty is a complex surgical procedure, comparable to revision surgery. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate singlestage hardware removal and THA outcomes, compare this technique with a matched control group that has undergone primary THA and assess the risk of periprosthetic joint infection with a 24-month minimum follow-up. Methods: This study included all those cases treated with THA and concomitant hardware removal from 2008 to 2018. The control group was selected on a 1:1 ratio among patients who underwent THA for primary OA. The Harris Hip (HHS) and University of California at Los Angeles Activity (UCLA) scores, infection rate and early and delayed surgical complications were recorded. Results: One hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients (127 hips) were included, and the same number of patients was assigned to the control group. The final functional scores were comparable between the two groups; a longer operative time and transfusion rate were recorded in the study group. Finally, an increased incidence of overall complications was reported (13.8% versus 2.4%), but no cases of early or delayed infection were found. Conclusions: Single-stage hardware removal and THA is a safe and effective but technically demanding technique, with a higher incidence of overall complications, making it more similar to revision THA than to primary THA. Keywords: conversion THA; hardware removal; periprosthetic joint disease; one-stage.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. <a href="https://zenodo.org/account/settings/login?next=https://zenodo.org/records/8383133">Log in</a> to check if you have access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

This set of raw data is accessible under request because include sensitive information. Please write your request at biblioteca@humanitas.it

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
10.3390/jcm12041666 (DOI)
36836201 (PMID)